BushOut06
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 02:06 PM
Original message |
Limbaugh refers to Gen. Wesley Clark as "Mad Bomber of Bosnia" |
|
I heard this earlier, probably around 12:30 this afternoon. Limbaugh was talking about Gen. Clark's efforts to get him off the Armed Forces Radio Network, when he referred to him as the "Mad Bomber of Bosnia."
It was bad enough when Limbaugh started referring to dissident soldiers as "phony soldiers", and then lying to cover it up. But here we have him calling a highly decorated war veteran by some derisive name. IMHO, this should be getting just as much attention as his previous anti-troop slur, if not even moreso. How in the hell do these people justify slamming MoveOn.org's "Gen. Betrayus" ad, and then turn around and denigrate Gen. Clark?
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Limbaugh what a sick SOB. |
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Take this straight to the Senate floor. Let's continue the mockery in a bipartisan fashion! nt |
RobertSeattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Air Force boming while a (D) is President is bad, while a (R) is President is good |
truebrit71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message |
4. How is that ANY different than the fake outrage over Gen Betray-Us? |
|
What a putrid sack of shit he is...
I'd like to see his fat-ass say that to the General face-to-face...
|
bullwinkle428
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
15. Considering that Limbaugh was the first to use the term "Betray-us" |
|
in the media, many months ago, as a reference to Chuck Hagel! :mad:
The hypocrisy is staggering...
|
thereismore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message |
karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Attacking all anti-war vets resonates more |
|
Attacking the very honorable Clark won't offend the people who have listened to the smears he has thrown at John Kerry, who was a much more junior officer. Both by the comments made by the Republicans are fair game as they opted to run for office (as Democrats). They did not add the words in parenthesis.
I don't get how criticizing a useless idiot like Limbaugh is considered a problem by the media when adttacking men like the general and the Senator aren't. This is a very warped time.
|
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Ratings must be slipping |
|
He has to be outrageous to keep the trash coming back for more. Lets see, we support the troops except the one's we don't. Aren't conservative values just so easy to shit on?
|
truebrit71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Pig-Boy is fucking with the WRONG 4-Star general here... |
youthere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
and he will very diplomatically and most certainly make it known that Limbaugh can go fuck himself.
|
Rob H.
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
10. It'd be worth getting Limbaugh and Clark in the same room |
|
just to see Limbaugh soil himself out of fear.
|
monmouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message |
11. This needs to be sent to the major newswires. I'll take some...eom |
noonwitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Maybe Rush should just go pop some oxycontin and stfu! |
|
It's not as if anyone is going to cancel his program-his ratings are too high.
|
Cass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Unfortunately I am not at all surprised they've turned the attack onto General Clark. |
|
Why would we expect them to show respect for General Clark when they didn't show the smallest measure of respect to soldiers in the field when they were sent to war without the proper armor? God help those soldiers if they decide to run for office with a D after their name - they will be savaged by a bunch of hypocritical lying assholes who had other things to do when it was their turn to serve their country.
|
bullwinkle428
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Just keep digging that hole deeper, you pathetic pus-bag!!! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |