Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scarborough repeated Limbaugh's defense of "phony soldiers" comment without noting its holes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:48 PM
Original message
Scarborough repeated Limbaugh's defense of "phony soldiers" comment without noting its holes
http://mediamatters.org/items/200710020009?f=h_topic

Summary: On MSNBC's Morning Joe, contributor Willie Geist stated that he had gone "back and looked at the full transcript" of Rush Limbaugh's recent description of soldiers who support withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq as "phony soldiers" and asserted that Limbaugh had been "talking about a specific soldier, this guy Jesse MacBeth," who falsely claimed to be an injured Iraq war veteran. Joe Scarborough agreed that Limbaugh's remark has "been blown out of context." However, the transcript and audio included in the original Media Matters item documenting Limbaugh's comments makes clear that he referred to "phony soldiers," plural.

On the October 2 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe, host Joe Scarborough and contributor Willie Geist discussed Rush Limbaugh's recent description of soldiers who support withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq as "phony soldiers," as Media Matters for America documented. After stating that he had gone "back and looked at the full transcript," Geist asserted that Limbaugh had been "talking about a specific soldier, this guy Jesse MacBeth," an anti-war activist who pleaded guilty to one count of making false statements to the Department of Veterans Affairs for falsely claiming to be an injured Iraq war veteran. Geist added that Limbaugh "was actually talking about a person who actually was a phony soldier." Scarborough responded, "Yeah, so it's been blown out of context."

But while Geist claimed that Limbaugh had been referring to a "specific soldier," the transcript and audio included in the original Media Matters item documenting Limbaugh's comments make clear that he referred to "phony soldiers," plural. Responding to a caller's statement that supporters of withdrawal "like to pull these soldiers that come up out of the blue and talk to the media," Limbaugh said, "The phony soldiers" . Moreover, Limbaugh made no reference to MacBeth until 1 minute and 50 seconds after his "phony soldiers" comment. As Media Matters documented, Limbaugh subsequently cropped the audio clip of his show to falsely suggest that his reference to MacBeth almost immediately followed his "phony soldiers" comment.

Geist's assertions that Limbaugh had been referring to a specific soldier echo Limbaugh's own misrepresentations of his original remark. On his September 28 program, Limbaugh claimed that he was "talking about one soldier with that 'phony soldier' comment, Jesse MacBeth" -- until a caller pointed out that he had used the plural.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Scarborough is friends with Limbaugh so his defense of him is no surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rewriting history. Funny that the people defending Rush
fail to mention that Rush felt the need to doctor the tapes. If he didn't say anything wrong, if he truly was talking about MacBeth then why the need to doctor the tapes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here's how I read this whole incident: There's more discontent in the ranks...
of the military than we know - and it's scaring the shit out of the NeoCons.

Their solution: try desperately to make the disgruntled military feel they're in the minority. Limbaugh, as the MAIN talk host on AFR, is leading this charge and is being protected as much as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is typical RWing Spin.
In defense, they keep lying. They think that repeated lies will eventually become the truth. Sometimes it works for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. RWing Spin (aka Propaganda) ALWAYS has as it's primary thrust...
the notion that dissent is confined to a small minority of the mentally unhinged. Always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. It works because of scarborough and the like of him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Good point, people talk about voting the R's out or impeaching Bush or throwing him out of office by
a pitchfork/torch wielding mob as being the only way to break his power, but there is one other, scary, possibility: If these bozos leaned on the active duty troops too hard and you started to see wholesale breaks in discipline and insubordination. This would remove any remaining authority or credibility of the Bush government overnight, and I suspect the thought has them more than a little nervous, especially given how hard they HAVE been leaning on the U.S. military to prop them up, both militarily and politically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Here's what Chomsky said a while back (about Vietnam):
...

What happened was, the army started falling apart. One of the reasons that the army was withdrawn was because the top military wanted it out of there. They were afraid they were not going to have an army anymore. Soldiers were fragging officers. The whole thing was falling apart. They were on drugs.

...

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/15/1448219&mode=thread&tid=25
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Of course he did. He's yet another dishonest Republican.
At the risk of being redundant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Jeez Scarborough... Give KO a call wouldja?
Geist, if he looked at a transcript at all, did NOT look at what was actually broadcast. (I understand that the edited version may have been the one that they played on army radio)

Frick lies and frack swears to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. They are all afraid of offending this guy. Cowards all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. the GOP shills are all on the same page -- Willie Geist is now exposed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vireo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well, at least Joe cut John Kerry some slack over his "botched joke"
Oh, no, I guess he didn't.

SCARBOROUGH: You know, I think his theme song should be "Sorry seems to be the Hardest Word," because back in 1971 he made some statements before the Senate, and most people were suggesting early on he should've just said he was sorry, that he maybe overstepped the bounds. And the same thing happened here. Immediately, people said, you know, Kerry ought to just apologize. Why is it so hard for John Kerry to say: "Hey, I'm sorry, I screwed up?"


http://mediamatters.org/items/200611020005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC