IT's not "Hillary hating" it's "Attempted Hillary SAVING!"...and It's All Good!

[Ken Burch]

Look, I want whoever we nominate to win.

I also want whoever we nominate to have a program that matters.

And I want whoever we nominate to work for the good of ALL the party, with all the party having a say in what she does. Apart from the fact that that is how a party that calls itself DEMOCRATIC is supposed to operate, I also pursue this latter goal because it will make us a more durable and MORE electable party by keeping all of the party engaged and energized.

HRC could engage her opponents and embrace what we ask of her and NOT LOSE ANYTHING.

It's about strength, hope, dreams, AND VICTORY!

Is that really so terrible a combination?

What's not to like about any of the above objectives?

[rusty quoin]

1. I don't think that's terrible.

I think it is about steps to correcting the wrongs of the past, and whoever we get, we push public opinion on them, to get what we want. But I do want someone who represents us. I am very concerned.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

2. A Positive Post

Cheers...

[Jed Dilligan]

3. She needs to be anti-war. Period.

She is walking into a trap wherein she will be tarred with the war and her opponent won't.

Maybe she dreads the "flip flopper" accusation, but she's no John Kerry. She CAN fight. She just needs to fight for what's RIGHT!

[daninthemoon]

4. Hear, hear. Some duers seem to want to lock step like the rethugs.

Any valid criticism is met with harsh accusations of all sorts, instead of thoughtful inquiry. If we don't voice our disagreemnts and concerns, who will? Corporate sponsors? Lobbyists? Neo-cons? We have to be heard.

[mikelewis]

5. Confucious Say...

In the Primary... we fall in love.

In the election... we fall in line.

Also...

He also say, He who go sleep with itchy ass; wake with smelly fingazz.

Don't worry... enjoy the process.

[Ken Burch]

6. The process of waking with "smelly fingazz"?

Ewwwwwwwwwww......