Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-04-07 05:07 PM
Original message |
rwingnuts pushing edited video of Gore from 1992 to "prove" hypocrisy |
|
A buddy of mine sent this link to Little Green Footballs: http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=27367&only&rss It's for this YouTube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDitSbkQKIsBut the REAL transcript is here: http://www.reasons-for-war-with-iraq.info/al-gore_9-29-1992.pdfNotice how horribly edited that video is and it cuts out key parts, esp. Gore discussing Poppy's involvement in the Iran/Contra criminal activity.
|
Buzz Clik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-04-07 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I watched about a minute and gave up. Who the hell cares? |
|
The early '90s situation was totally different than the situation we had in 2002/2003. If your little buddy wants to play games with a Gore speech from nearly 20 years ago, tell him we want even more. Give this jerkoff something to do.
|
poverlay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-04-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I agree. Tell your friend that the Bush family is clearly not interested in the |
|
public's wellbeing and Al Gore is. That'll put a twist in his knickers.
|
Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-04-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Well, I wouldn't be surprised to hear of attacks on Al next week by the hate merchants of talk radio |
|
A pre-emptive strike on an Al Gore candidacy.
|
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-04-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message |
3. fuck little green footballs |
|
i`d rather read stormfront than these pricks..actually they are wasting their time doing this cause no one reads their shitting little inbred site...the biggest collective circle jerk on the net-they won`t accept new "members",i guess they are satisfied with jerking off each other...
oh well let them have their little moment in the sun
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |