Have you seen the consolidation in Naples? It's astounding. Overall, we have a MUCH smaller footprint in Italy now. Not larger. And our footprint across the EU is astoundingly smaller.
"Standing on the ramparts" is a turn of phrase. Sorry if it excited or confused you somehow. What I was referring to, in plain language, is that if anyone attacks Italy, we spring to their defense as though it were our own homeland that was attacked. I mean, really--if you didn't get that this is what I meant, I'd be surprised. But the snark was unnecessary. It doesn't add to the discussion.
The capability or desire of militaries to deploy forward isn't going to go away. There won't be a 'Swords Into Plowshares' or Kumbaya Moment around the world anytime soon. If it weren't a US base, it would be a Russian or Chinese one. You might not like that reality, but that's the truth. And wishing otherwise won't make it happen.
I also think you don't realize that the land where these facilities will be placed is already military land. The section of Dal Molino to be converted is, and has been, military--it's just underutilized. We only build bases on land that the ITALIAN government owns, and their military controls. If more land is acquired, it's the ITALIANS who buy it, not us. When we cede facilities back, we cede them back to the Italian government, specifically, to military management.
If Italians don't realize where their taxes go, that's on them. I think they do know. Frankly, I don't really think they're as stupid as you make them out to be--my friends were very interested in politics, and were voracious consumers of Italian, US and international news. And the Communists over there never shut the fuck up, so I'm sure they've been flogging the fact a-plenty. Most Italians I know are better informed than most Americans, and certainly have a great gift for nuance as well as the ability to comprehend multiple points of view.
Some history:
http://stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=41844&archive=trueAt stake is the U.S. use of a part of the airfield, still under control of the Italian military though mostly used by small civilian aircraft. It is a few miles northwest of the center of the city and the main U.S. installation, Caserma Ederle. Ederle, named after an Italian World War I hero, is home to SETAF and the 173rd Airborne Brigade.
But the brigade, which stood up in Vicenza on June 12, 2000, has grown from a single battalion to six battalions under Army transformation. Two battalions are based in Vicenza, with three more in Bamberg, Germany, and another in Schweinfurt, Germany.
The U.S. military has said it wants to consolidate the brigade in one location, implying that a “no” decision on Dal Molin for offices and barracks would mean the brigade would relocate — possibly to another country. That led local Italian workers on base, who number more than 700, to stage their own demonstration last week in support of the expansion.
Contrary to many Italian media reports, the expansion would not create the largest U.S. military base outside the States. In fact, as put forth in plans by U.S. officials, the U.S. presence in Vicenza is among the smallest in Italy in terms of land use, trailing Aviano Air Base, Navy facilities in and around Naples and Sigonella and Camp Darby. And it would be smaller than Aviano in terms of active-duty populations.
SETAF says the proposal would bring about 1,600 troops from Germany to Vicenza, bringing the Army population to about 4,200. Since the buildings still need to be built at the airfield, the move isn’t expected to take place until 2011.