Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CACHED: Mark Penn's (Clinton 'top strategist') union-busting webpage before he scrubbed it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:56 AM
Original message
CACHED: Mark Penn's (Clinton 'top strategist') union-busting webpage before he scrubbed it
"Companies cannot be caught unprepared by Organized labor's campaigns!" "Your partner to achieve your business goals" "We have strong ties to those that influence labor policy" . . . I could vomit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Can union-busting tactics be used on campaigns? n/t
Edited on Sat Oct-06-07 10:58 AM by antigop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good catch.
I bet they work closely with the Chamber of Commerce as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's going to kill me...


To have to vote for her if she wins the primary!


:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Such a sad comment in more ways that one.
It is sad that you have to compromise your principles and it is sad that this is the kind of candidate the Democrats are putting forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. "have to vote for her"
Edited on Sat Oct-06-07 12:33 PM by notsodumbhillbilly
Silly me! I thought we have the right to vote for whomever we choose. If she's the nominee, I'll write-in Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. I second that
I will NOT vote for HRC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnotforgotten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
36. I Will Never Vote For Hillary Because Of Iraq
This only makes it easier for me to hold my head high as the Republicans once again take control of this country because we Democrats allow the DLC to rule our political destiny with the likes of Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. They maintain ties with organizations that influence labor policy
I can think of one such organization...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You said it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. NAFTA, anyone?
In Michigan, about half of all jobs were in the manufacturing sector. Good paying jobs that made it possible to build a middle class. Today, there are about 14-percent manufacturing jobs.

I wonder where the money is these days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. And Lou Dobbs said in the mid 80's meat packers made about $18/hr, they
now make around $9/hr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. No surprise here. The Clintons hate labor unions!
After all, they done so much to destroy them with their globalization projects. Long live neo-liberalism! sarcasm!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. Burson-Marstellar is a slimy organization in general
Read SourceWatch's entry on them:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Burson-Marsteller

They're as bad a Hill & Knowlton, the PR group famous for the fake Kuwaiti "baby incubator" story:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. Destroying unions to increase corporate profits...
Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. I believe that web page went up before Penn was hired as CEO - and has come down under Penn n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. In Senator Clinton's defense

Her Senate voting record on Labor is near perfect. It has been posted and discussed in the GDP and Labor Forums in the past. She did not do labor or working families any favors while on the Wal-Mart board that I can tell. She did try to advance women in the lower jobs there though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftist_not_liberal Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes, it is all very complicated and nuanced
when one attempts to serve two masters.

Why she and Bill both didn't run as Republicans is a mystery to me.

Or maybe a conspiracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Thanks for posting this. Although I really question her affiliation with this
guy, it's not fair to assume she's anti-labor. Her record says otherwise.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. her record as in her time on the board of Wal-Mart?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
31. "She did not do labor or working families any favors while on the Wal-Mart board"
any details? links? please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. Link
"Mrs. Clinton’s six-year tenure as a director of Wal-Mart, the nation’s largest company, remains a little known chapter in her closely scrutinized career. And it is little known for a reason. Mrs. Clinton rarely, if ever, discusses it, leaving her board membership out of her speeches and off her campaign Web site.

Fellow board members and company executives, who have not spoken publicly about her role at Wal-Mart, say Mrs. Clinton used her position to champion personal causes, like the need for more women in management and a comprehensive environmental program, despite being Wal-Mart’s only female director, the youngest and arguably the least experienced in business. On other topics, like Wal-Mart’s vehement anti-unionism, for example, she was largely silent, they said."

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/20/us/politics/20walmart.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Thank you for this information.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. He's a charmer, alright.
Nice catch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. You are known
by the company you keep. Well, THAT'S what I was taught...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Noy just known, but influenced
by the company that you keep. We can see that all over the Clintons' last tenure in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. Sickening!
R&K!

:thumbsup::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #17
34. so, Brian, how's that novel coming along, hmm? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. since returning unions to promenance is important to restoring the
middle class this is a big problem. this guy is bad news. I was sitting on the fence hoping my fav Al Gore would jump in. i am still sitting on the fence and where hil is concerned i will sit on that fence longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Check out Post #13 from Omaha Steve. He's just the PR guy, he's not going
to change her mind on policy. She'll be telling HIM what to do. Gotta be fair, here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Gore fired him because he was arrogant & pushy and would NOT limit himself
to what he was hired to do, present poll data objectively. Penn is a snake and I do not trust that his agenda is not interfering on Clinton's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Or did Bill recommend him to Gore, Gore found out Penn was not the kind
of person he wanted on his team because of all this stuff that's coming out now, and used the arrogant, pushy line to remove him while not rocking the boat with Bill during an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #22
35. You don't hire people just because they are talented.
You hire them because they are talented in fields you need support in, and hold positions you agree with.

She's LOOKING for anti-labor help, she hires Penn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. :nodding:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
23. I sure am glad this asshole is her top advisor
a fucking union buster. Unbelievable... well until you remember who's responsible for NAFTA, opening up trade with China, etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
24. The Clintons sure are making it appear they hate Unions.
First Bill, with one of the two issues I was upset with him for, resigning NAFTA(the welfare agreement). This needs to be made into a commercial by moveon or one of the other candidates. The seeping out of bad things about Clinton is rather disturbing. She's a moderate to begin with, but she said troops to be in Iraq for 5 more years, she voted for the Kyl/Lieberman gift to Bushler, she has Indian connections where a lot of our jobs went, and now this.


My mostly positive thoughts on Bill withstanding, I don't want Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton/Bush etc... enough. They should make it you cannot be president if your mother father sister or brother were also president - it sets things up to be too much of a dynasty that can do whatever they want.

I'm surely hoping that Obama, Biden or John Edwards will surge in the next couple weeks. If not, maybe Al will step in the race to stop her.

Someone, please tell me why I shouldn't be so against her, because she's making me hope she has a tourette's moment in the next debate to end her chances. I'm starting to feel she's not even trustworthy. Maybe it's just late...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. If it lasts more than a couple of weeks a doctor will often deem it chronic
Often getting rid of the disease requires something stronger than the disease is able to withstand. What the cure is i have no clue but the disease is quite obvious :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
27. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
32. Unions are our weapon...
...in the ever-present class war. Unions are patriotic, as they help people, not corporations get what they deserve, and keep it.

This company is treasonous, and Clinton should get rid of them asap!

I want to destroy ANY organization that wants to bust unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
33. He worked to prep Prince of Blackwater for his hearings & worked
at "union busting" too? Nice guy.



You can tell a lot about people by who they have around them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
38. clinton/corporocracy related not surprising -she would sell out to the devil-oh she has
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
39. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
42. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a kennedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
43. Thanks for this.....
and I never did vote for the first clinton, and will search my heart long and hard before I ever vote for another one, unless she IS the nominee. D*mn this is hard to swallow. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC