Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mark Penn's firm behind PR blitz urging pregnant women to eat more fish, mercury be damned!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:00 AM
Original message
Mark Penn's firm behind PR blitz urging pregnant women to eat more fish, mercury be damned!
Oct. 4, 2007 (Bloomberg) -- A nonprofit group backed by the seafood industry urged pregnant women and nursing mothers to eat more fish than recommended by U.S. officials concerned that mercury contamination can hurt babies.

The group, the National Healthy Mothers, Healthy Babies Coalition, said women who avoid seafood to limit exposure to mercury deprive their babies and themselves of essential nutrients. Women should eat at least the 12 ounces a week suggested as a maximum by the government, the coalition said today at a briefing in Washington.

Child-development and nutrition specialists produced and promoted the report, with $74,000 from the seafood industry's advocacy arm, the National Fisheries Institute. That group is a client of Burson-Marsteller, a New York-based public-relations unit of WPP Group Plc in London. A Burson-Marsteller employee serves as vice-chairman of the coalition behind the study. The coalition said it was acting in the public's interest.

"It's our job to translate the science for people who need it most," said Judy Meehan, executive director of the Alexandria, Virginia-based coalition, in a telephone interview today. ``This is of critical importance. What happens during those nine months affects that individual's lifetime.''

Institute vice president Maryanne Hansan declined to disclose fees paid to Burson-Marsteller. At that firm, representative Patricia Pincus declined to comment on the company's relationships with its clients.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601101&sid=axA77zz5n5sA&refer=japan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. ohmygod. Does he eat puppies too? He is EVIL EVIL
and why...that makes...(gasp) Hillary Clinton evil too!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. ROFL! You know, some people here on DU will believe that! Sad, isn't it? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. And some people will say Mrs. Clinton is dealing with the devil.
Edited on Sun Oct-07-07 10:05 AM by Bluebear
Sad, isn't it? "ROFL!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Yes, it is sad, when the people on DU start sounding like those on Free Republic. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Take your pejoratives elsewhere, journalist3072.
Edited on Sun Oct-07-07 10:23 AM by Bluebear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I guess the truth hurts, doesn't it? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Away with you, and take your Hillary button with you.
Edited on Sun Oct-07-07 10:36 AM by Bluebear
Some of us are populists and progressives here. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. And some of you like to engage in group think, because you haven't been taught how to have your own
opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftist_not_liberal Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. I gots my own :)
Edited on Sun Oct-07-07 12:33 PM by leftist_not_liberal
Hey journo.

I'm a noob. I work for progress some when I can. I was a state delegate my state's Democratic convention in 2004. But I am also a Marxist, plain and (some would say especially :) ) simple.

My opinion is that the company MB is so wildly large that it can and does do a number of contradictory things, some of them utterly amoral. Now even a Rovian workaholic like Penn can't manage all of that. But if it doesn't show the enormous gulf between the corporate class and the rest of us proles, what does?

As far as these mere poison the people campaigns go (don't miss the Bovine Growth Hormone one too), they are important but the polling stuff is positively scary, and Penn is much more directly entangled with that. Of course I am a 'tin foil hatter' who thinks we have has some election stealing going on as historical and social context for all of this so-far otherwise spotty history. I posted in another thread that a lot of the coup-stuff has little solid reporting behind it that I've been able to find. But the ability? Oh yeah. Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates have it in droves.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=1990587&mesg_id=1992350

Seems to me what we see here is yet more evidence for the highest level of power, those where coronations seem to be in the wind, that there are a number of shared objectives that some are calling disaster capitalism
(http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2007/09/reviewing-naomi-kleins-shock-doctrine.html)

The hawkishness. The militarism. It's all surprisingly, increasingly bipartisan. I have been reading DU with interest for some time, especially as the chasm between the base and the leadership has yawned to vigorous life on the Greatest Page. My my my. Wow.

Power relations. Folks, it's time to study up. I wish Mark Penn would have some of Dr. Gene Sharp's pamphlets air dropped on us like he did the Ukrainians. Only 88 pages to start a revolution. In a few places.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2005/05/29/war_by_other_means?pg=full

Power relations. Obviously, there is some thirst for the facts as evidenced by the top of the greatest page right now. Like my granddaddy, no Red, always said, "It is ALL about the money."

What are we missing here? We need to spread some more democracy.

Domestically.

What are we missing here?

Cheers,

LNL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #31
52. Your grandfather was right.
Welcome to DU. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. I realize this is your theme of the week, you keep repeating it, but it's just not so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #14
65. It does indeed. And you're the one that's hurting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. You can say that again! It's sad what DU is becoming. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. What's so sad? What are we becoming? Free thinkers who don't give people like Penn a pass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. There are too many Hillary & Penn apologists for my taste.
That's what I'm saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #38
48. I think there are too many slam Hillary threads
There were two nearly identical threads about Penn on the front page at one time today. I counted 10 others in the greatest column. A group of people recommends every thread that slams Hillary. They have a disproportionate share of the attention.

Of course, I like arguing with them so its really OK with me if there are some slam Hillary threads. Just not everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #48
70. Jeez! You should care more for The Truth instead of your sad misguided loyalty to a candidate!
Edited on Mon Oct-08-07 04:19 PM by TheGoldenRule
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. I see lots of stuff about Hillary that isn't true
Last night they said she called an audience member a plant. She didn't. I'm trying to find a tape of event.

My loyalty is to the party. I'm very worried about America progressing toward fascism. The GOP and especially the right wing must be stopped. If Hillary is who we've got, I hope everybody goes with Hillary. Smearing her now with falsehoods could hurt later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. Falsehoods?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. Yeah. Often there are falsehoods about Hillary
There are groundless character smears too. I just found a recording of what Hillary said in Iowa and its nothing like how the smear threads last night said it was.

I wonder sometimes if some of the anti-Hillary stuff here drifted over from the GOP.

I feel like I'm the one defending the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. Again WTF?! You are not making sense. Why not address what's in the OP?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Because I was responding to post #38
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. Not dealing with him.
Just hiring him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. hiLLary shouLd repLace him with romney's former chief of staff
what a nice guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hillary's handlers are brushing up on ways to say she didn't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. didn't know what? That he works for a PR firm that represents lots of people
from different persuasions? AAGGGGHHH.

I can't take the lemming-like responses here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. "A PR firm that represents lots of people" - I'll say.
* Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, a firm owned by the Abu Dhabi government; PR Week reported in August 2007 that "the contract runs through January 31, 2008, and is worth an estimated $802,250, including fees and expenses" <20>
* Action Performance Cos.
* Allergan: Botox
* American Public Health Assn.
* CDW Government Inc.
* Cephalon Inc.
* Chicago Office of the Mayor
* Citizens Flag Alliance
* Colombia <21>
* Coach Inc.
* Dubai 2003
* Entergy Corp.: Indian Point nuclear power plant
* Foundation for Clean Air Progress
* Housing & Construction CA
* HP
* IGN Entertainment Inc.
* Indonesian Government
* Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity <22>
* Iraqi National Congress
* JAMDAT Mobile Inc.
* Miller Brewing Co.
* Lincoln Park <23>
* Novell <24>
* Optimus Inc.
* Orbitz
* Philippines, The
* Presidential Climate Action Project <25>
* Public Utility Commission of Texas
* Qualcomm
* R.R. Donnelley Financial
* SAP AG
* Sony Electronics
* SRI <26>
* State Farm
* Stellar Internet Monitoring
* T.D. Jakes, Bishop
* Texas Assn. of Business
* think3 <27>
* UNITA (anticommunist group led by Savimbi)(Source: Julie Gozan, MultinatinalMonitor, April 1993.
* U.S. Treasury Dept.
* Union Banka (UB)
* Wine.com <28>
* YukosSibneft Oil Company

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Burson-Marsteller
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. ...the problem with this is that the brains behind Clinton's campaign are people who use their
talents to make as much money as possible for themselves, and that helping people is not their primary concern.

It's about power for them and not principles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
25. You hit it on the nail.
Why is she surrounding herself with people who are more interested in making a better life exclusively for themselves? Rather than in making a better America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
49. In fairness on that point
Mark Penn started with the Clintons in 1996. That was years before he took over as CEO of Burson-Martsteller.

Hillary probably kept him on because he does a good job for her. She could fire him for becoming an inhuman sellout to some of the worst groups on the planet, but most of the talented folks in Washington end up doing the same thing. Its either all rookies and unproven staff or accepting the sleaze.

I wish she'd get rid of the guy. From what I read he is giving her some terrible DLC type of advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terri S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
43. exactly right.
I'm not sure why so many think Hillary doesn't know who Mark Penn is and what his PR company has done. She strikes me as someone who could care less as long as she wins. Hell, her campaign said long ago that they admired Karl Rove and proudly proclaimed that they would attempt to use his tactics. Winning is everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
66. That, and the guy is either incompetent or twists his results to fit his bizarre ideology
Ezra Klein reviews Mark Penn's book here:

http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3320/trending_towards_inanity/

People assume that any Democratic administration will mean a return to competence in the Executive, but if that is the case, why is Mark Penn the brains behind Hillary Clinton's campaign? (Read the review: the guy's polling is very bizarre.) Then there's her speech praising Michael Chertoff's competency:

http://www.vote-smart.org/speech_detail.php?sc_id=145183&keyword=chertof&phrase=&contain=

I question her judgment on a lot of things, including her ability to pick executive branch officials who are up to the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Yep. if she knew then what she knows now! lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Well, if I were Hillary I'd get rid of this guy very quickly and have some good answers of how she
didn't know these things and as soon as it was brought to her attention that she got rid of him....Whether that's true that she didn't know or not will become irrelevant. But if she wants to win, she better act fast and send Mark Penn walking because the internet is on fire this morning. Everywhere I have gone on various democratic blogs, its one of the biggest discussion topics with lists of his involvements and Burston-Marsteller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. I am convinced they want a vast population to just die and get off the land
they covet for their playgrounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
62. Limited resources and climate crisis. I agree this great transfer of wealth from public coffers
to those who play along is a calculated action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
11. They started promoting this again on the Today Show this past week. I believe
Edited on Sun Oct-07-07 10:47 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
their Dr. on board, Nancy Snyderman is in cohoots with propagandizing this bullshit for corporations. This isn't the only thing she's promoted that didn't feel right on a gut level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well, they have to "interpret the science" for us, after all.
The first thing that comes to my mind is "catapult the propaganda".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. I wish I have the transcript...if I recollect, part of her spiel was that if you don't
eat fish during pregnancy, your child might not be as bright as they can be because of the lack of omega 3 oils.

(I very rarely eat fish (canned tuna, smoked salmon) and both of my sons are very very bright, thank you very much.)

And "catapult the propaganda" sounds about right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. I would love to see the studies that balance the intelligence enhancing benefits of
omega-3 oils against the retardation enhancing effects of mercury poisoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. FYI, the article about the spot was pulled from MSNBC. I wonder why??? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
50. It's a good thing I did not know that when I was pregnant
It would probably have freaked me out since the only food I couldn't smell, much less eat was fish.

Ate it before and after my pregnancy, but no way during.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. Want to chuckle? I did a search for that segment of the show and the
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. OMG! How low can he go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. $ $ $ $ $ $ is all the man needs. Principles? None.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Really! Hillary must have really lousy judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
24. Thanks for all the history you've been digging up on this utter creep, Bluebear! recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftist_not_liberal Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
28. Oh Sweet Jeebus! I'm gonna get in trouble
having such a new handle.

How many recommends can I do without flooding the system again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
29. Sleazy.
If Hillary has any political acumen she'll fire Penn yesterday.

Still like the idea of sending her flea collars, since she's lying with dogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
30. If it's the Omega-3
then pregnant women might get it from sources like flax seed instead of fish. No, I'm not a doctor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. I took Nordic Naturals fish oil
in lieu of eating as much seafood as I would have liked...expensive but it was worth it to me.

http://www.nordicnaturals.com/environment.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. I was thinking that when I read those "reports" a few days ago
There are more sources of those nutrients than mercury-laden fish.

Why don't they just help clean up the rivers and streams so we can eat fish without fear? Amazing concept for them, I'm sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Well no, because that would be harmful to business.
Big business gets #1 priority, don't forget. Public health and clean environment are way down toward the bottom of the list of priorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Yep, them Commie Red Socialist ideals will get us nowhere!
What was I thinking? :shrug:

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
33. This is criminal! This country already has a crop of kids poisoned by Mercury & who now have Autism.
These fucking greedy unethical bastards make me sick! Do NOT be fooled again people! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. There is NO proven link between mercury and autism
None.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #46
54. And it has NOT been proven that Mercury did not cause Autism.
Just because the pharma giants don't want it to be so-

and are doing everything in their power-funded by their billions of dollars-for it not to be so-

doesn't mean it ain't so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. since there is no mercury in any vaccine
except for a couple of flu vaccines (which you can get thimerosol free) why the fuck should the pharmas care?
Nobody ever proved the moon is NOT made of green cheese either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #58
69. Mercury is in the preservative Thimerosol which was in vaccines given to infants & toddlers
FYI-the pharma giants care because they will be sued for millions/billions of dollars by the families of the children they poisoned! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #46
60. Not True...
http://www.safeminds.org/

The studies are done, Big Pharma vigorously suppresses/contradicts the studies, the Bush Administration and the Corporate Media side with Big Pharma and, hey presto, no proven link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #60
67. Indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
40. i was wondering about this
they even placed an article on the front page of msnbc.com the other day

how could anyone with a conscience advise a pregnant woman to eat that much fish?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
44. Omg. Scum.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
45. There is plenty of fish that does not contain mercury
You only have to worry about tuna, swordfish, and other top predators. Catfish, tilapia, salmon should all be fair game. No mercury at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. But this ad blitz recommended eating more than even the US government recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #51
76. still not a problem if you're eating the fish that contain no mercury.
I don't think anyone ever suffered ill effects from eating 12 oz of mercury-free fish a week, pregnant or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #45
63. Depends on where it comes from.
I wouldn't eat the fish from anywhere near the waters next to the chemical plants here in south texas, and I won't touch catfish. I've met too many people who have gotten ill right after eating the same meal my husband had. Some people are more susceptible to reacting to the crap the catfish eat on the bottom of their living environments.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
47. So that's what Hillary means by takinjg the politics of science
Associating with folks like that is a LONG TIME Clinton deal- reflected in their policies.

Quite frankly it still surprises me how some DUers don't seem to care. Wow....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
53. CNN's corporate science whore covered this propaganda the other day.
I was surprised by the almost complete 180 that CNN was reporting and figured that corporate sociopathy was behind it. I'm all for injecting mercury directly into the family members of the EVIL propagandists more concerned about self-interest and money than our children.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lethe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
55. There are some fish with very low levels of mercury and it is very beneficial to eat them
if this guy was advocating eating swordfish every day (which is extremely high in mercury), it would be outragously unhealthy for a mother.

But advocating something like canned salmon would be fine. It has an extremely low amount of mercury, and is very safe to eat and very beneficial for health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 04:30 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. "Women who avoid seafood to limit exposure to mercury deprive their babies and themselves.....
of essential nutrients."

That is the quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lethe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. check out www.gotmercury.org to check for mercury levels in different fish
It says canned salmon has "undetectable" levels of mercury in it, which would be safe to eat often and very healthy because of Omega 3's and everything else in it. (also fresh salmon has low mercury levels)

Compare that to swordfish:

2 oz of swordfish for a 120 lbs woman would be 140% of EPA recommended limit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #57
59. Question, doesn't Mercury accumulate in your body over your lifetime, or is it flushed...
out over time? I thought it was like every other heavy metal poisoning, like lead, and accumulates. In a case like that, even low amounts can be dangerous, if you eat it all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lethe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. yes it does accumulate
Elemental mercury can readily be eliminated as waste by the body. The majority of mercury we consume however is methylmecury, which has been altered to an organic form in algae and plants, which the fish eat, and then we eat. The methylmercury mimics an amino acid or protein and is harder for the body to get rid of.

As mentioned in the article, selenium, which is also found in fish, helps to counteract mercury absorption.
Also, we need to remember that almost everything in our food supply has mercury in it, not just fish. I wonder how the average cut of beef at the supermarket compares to a salmon steak in mercury content?

I still think eating fish can be really beneficial to health, as long as you eat a type that has low mercury content. Also, you want to choose a type of fish that has a low chance of PCBs. According to most studies, farmed fish have much higher PCB concentration than wild caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #56
68. Fucking A. There's nothing in fish you can't get in more healthful sources.
Babies born to vegetarian mothers have higher IQs on average, and of course they get no fish-sourced omega 3's in utero. Which is no problem for anybody, there are loads of omega 3s in flax, walnuts and other plant sources without all the mercury, cholesterol, flame retardants and god knows what else eating dead fish exposes a body to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #68
77. yes, I was thinking walnuts, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #55
64. I wouldn't want to take that chance if I was pregnant, though. I'd rather
pay for refined fish oil supplements or add flaxseed oil to my diet. I am a mother of an autistic child. I don't think any "minute" amount of mercury is okay for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC