Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Daily Show does it again! Tonight's guest, Vicente Fox, former President of Mexico!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:02 PM
Original message
The Daily Show does it again! Tonight's guest, Vicente Fox, former President of Mexico!
Edited on Mon Oct-08-07 10:09 PM by Up2Late
On Now! (or soon, show's on now).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fed_Up_Grammy Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. No thanks !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Don't like the Daily Show
...or aren't interested in what the former Pres. of Mexico has to say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. What do you have against Coca-Cola?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Do you think Jon is going to ask Fox about Shrub being afraid of horsies???
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I don't know, but Jon Stewart v. any Conservative Politician who first language in not English...
... Piece of Cake! This could get very interesting.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
31. I found the whole interview disappointing. Fox is a corporatist
and started to discuss a North American union. He also bad mouthed a few of the socialist presidents from South America. Jon more or less just sat there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for the heads' up. My mom just called me about this one.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. No problem. He was on NPR's "Talk of the Nation" today too...
Edited on Mon Oct-08-07 10:19 PM by Up2Late
...Good interview, at least until he started talking smack about Hugo Chávez near the end.:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Watching now.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks! I turned it on and
caught John Oliver giving Jon his "you're helping the terrorist" spiel and Samantha Bee riffing on larry craig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nafta has been good to me.
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. He was pushing, quietly, the North American Union, which would be the end of
the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Yup, it's been great for Mexico, Canada and The Forbes 500 Corps.
For us non-Super Rich, it sucks.:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. It was so good for Mexico, they had to get BushCo's help
to steal the election.

Fox is a charming @sshole, just like so many of these criminals are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. So why was Bill Clinton so in love with it?
He had a major NAFTA woody during his whole presidency. He must have known what it would do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. NAFTA was a Reagan/BUSH scam and was signed in 1992 by George H.W. BUSH!!!
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 12:11 AM by Up2Late
Clinton didn't like it, but Bush had already signed it, so he tried to amend it in 1993, but pretty much had to sign it (see link and info below).

It was proposed under Reagan, Bush pushed it though the closely divided House, with help from House Minority Whip DICK CHENEY and then Newt Gingrich and BUSH signed it!

Everyone always seems to forget that, thanks to the "fair and balanced" MSM in this country.


<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement>

History of the implementation

NAFTA was initially pursued by conservative governments in the United States and Canada supportive of free trade, led by Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, U.S. President George H. W. Bush, and the Mexican President Carlos Salinas de Gortari. The three countries signed NAFTA in December 1992, subject to ratification by the legislatures of the three countries. There was considerable opposition in all three countries, but in the United States it was able to secure passage after Bill Clinton made its passage a major legislative initiative in 1993. During his presidential campaign he had promised to review the agreement, which he considered inadequate. :hi:Since the agreement had been signed by Bush under his fast-track prerogative :hi:, Clinton did not alter the original agreement, but complemented it with the aforementioned NAAEC and NAALC. After intense political debate and the negotiation of these side agreements, the U.S. House passed NAFTA by 234-200 (132 Republicans and 102 Democrats voting in favor, 156 Democrats, 43 Republicans, and 1 independent against).<4> and the U.S. Senate passed it by 61-38<5>


I was shocked too when he signed it, but I don't think he had much choice, due to the way Bush and the ReThugs engineered the whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. "made its passage a major legislative initiative in 1993. "
Didn't sound like he protested too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Oh I see how it works, only read the part of the sentence that supports your point!
How Republic Party of you!

Well, if you actually read the whole sentence you pulled that from, and then go that one step further and try to figure out what that sentence means in the context of the paragraph...

Oh, but that would take some effort on your part, sorry, I guess that would be asking too much to actually read the whole paragraph, let alone the whole History section at the link I provided.

So, do you understand the way that International Treaties work? They Supersede the U.S. Constitution, did you know that? That means, they take precedence, so once Bush signed it, if President Clinton were to back out of NAFTA after Bush "Fast Tracked" it, it would be close to an act of War.

So Yes, He Did Protest it (as shown in the history) and he did try to fix it as much as he could without causing an international incident.

NAFTA was NOT President Clinton baby, it was ALL Reagan/Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Noam Chomsky disagrees with you, as would anyone
that has some measure of objectivity. Clinton had a NAFTA hard-on his whole presidency:

http://www.chomsky.info/articles/199401--.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. as I recall, Bill pretty much used up his political capital
forcing us all to swallow Nafta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. As long as Vincente Fox comes
out okay..that was interesting about his ancestor riding the horse from Cincinatti, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Yeah. Right. For him but not the "bottom 95%",
When 1/6th of the citizens of Mexico leave to find jobs and better conditions in other countries, it'd be a good idea to get a fucking clue!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Cause he's indigenous". Oh, really?
"Evo, Hugo, terrible."

(Vicente, I hope your assets are over seas, because the people are going to win this one. lol)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Vincente talked a good
game before he started with that fish story and calling down my faves..Hugo and Evo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Yup, he told the same "fish story" today on "Talk of the Nation" on NPR.
But he did give away a few Coca-Cola in Mexico secrets at the end:

<http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15097316>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thanks for the link..
I couldn't wade through all that crap to read "the coca cola secrets".

It was funny at the end of the interview when Fox asked Jon if he were "Basque" with a name like Jon..and Jon said.."No, Jew..Big Jew". Jon Stewart..I hope he does ask Evo Morales back!

And gets Chavez on his show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Was it the Basque who persecuted the Jews and the Muslims in Spain...???
...or was that just the Roman Catholic Church? Or is that the same difference? I don't know much about Spanish persecution, not something that they covered much in the Indiana Public Schools:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Me, neither..it was just weird that Vincente
Edited on Mon Oct-08-07 11:14 PM by zidzi
comes outta right field with "Basque". Jon probably thought that everyone knows he's Jewish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. yeah, i understand his point, BUT
there's a LOT of poor people doing a LOT of fishing, but the rich have better hooks and bait. corn niblets only get you so far when you fish against minnows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Vincente Fox is just spouting
elitism talking points..Chavez and Morales are doing the heavy lifting for their people and their countries.

It's real nice that Vincente didn't have to be run out of Mexico on a rail but I'm still not impressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. I smelled a whiff of (at least) elitism, there.
It's be nice if Fox and others had to flee. I'd like that. Yep.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Fox represents the ruling class. They're not as crass as Junior
(who is?) but that's exactly what they all look like.

Charming, well spoken, and so massively self serving they don't even know it themselves. Accident of birth put me in their vicinity. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Yup, a lot of U. S. Americans don't really understand the Class system in Mexico...
...and that there are "white" (Spanish Conquistador) Mexicans and the mostly oppressed "brown" (Indigenous) Mexicans, who are most of who we get here because the White Mexican business/land owners won't create jobs in Mexico for them.

Oh, and then there are the mixed race (white/brown) Mexicans, who make up most of the growing middle class.

Btw, look quick, your post total is 55555! (or at least it was when I looked).:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
33. good show
interesting interview. Best thing of the night was on Colbert though with the little kids explaining SCHIPS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Yup, I posted about that one too...
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 12:26 PM by Up2Late
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
35. Video links from last night's show!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC