Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Dems who vote AGAINST SChip!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 05:16 AM
Original message
House Dems who vote AGAINST SChip!
We are this close to an override on this Veto. It would be a shame not to let these Dems know that some things are ok, some things are not.

Bush Dog Dems:
Jim Marshall (D-GA)–Washington, D.C. Office (202)225-6531; Macon, GA Office 1-877-464-0255; Tifton, GA Office (229)556-7418.

Baron Hill (D-IN)–Washington, D.C. Office (202)225-5315; Jeffersonville, IN Office (812)288-3999; Bloomington, IN Office (812)336-3000.

Gene Taylor (D-MS)–Washington, D.C. Office (202)225-5772; Bay St. Louis, MS Office (228)469-9235; Gulfport, MS Office (228)864-7670; Ocean Springs, MS Office (228)872-7950; Hattiesburg, MS Office (601)582-3246; Laurel, MS Office (601)425-3905.

Bob Etheridge (D-NC)–Washington, D.C. Office (202)225-4531; Raleigh, NC Office (919)829-9122 or 1-888-262-6202; Lillington, NC Office (910)814-0335 or 1-866-384-3743.

Mike McIntyre (D-NC)–Washington, D.C. Office (202)225-2731; Lumberton, NC Office (910)735-0610; Fayetteville, NC Office (910)323-0260; Wilmington, NC Office (910)815-4959; Bolivia, NC Office (910)253-0158.




Here's a useful "action page":http://openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1791
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why do Bush's Poodles hate sick kids? -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I dunno - why do Democrats just want to beat Bush even when
the bill in question is flawed?

Why do you want to use sin taxes to fund this when everyone should be funding it? Keep taxing "sins" and, eventually, you'll have no one to tax and the program goes out the window.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Flawed? LOL!
What the fuck isn't flawed? You must be a true Panglossian. Yes, it's flawed; it also provides health insurance for millions of kids. That it doesn't include legal immigrant children is sad, but politics truly is the art of the possible. It truly does take compromise on many issues to move forward and accomplish ANYTHING positive. One great example of this is Bernie Sanders.

I have no use for those who are so pure that anything short of perfect is a deal with the devil. Screw that. Truer words than these were never spoken:

The perfect IS the enemy of the good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
41. Umm.... I meant that it only taxes a dwindling group of people.
Which means, as that product gets more and more expensive, people will either quit, or, more likely, resort to purchasing said product on the black market, thus leaving the SCHIP program largely unfunded.

In other words, you don't know what the hell you were talking about.

I didn't even MENTION illegal immigrants. I mentioned the people who would be taxed. :wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I want sick kids to have access to healthcare. If we can dump billions every week into a pointless
military adventure blowing shit up around the globe, then we can afford to look after our own sick kids at home.

Frankly, I don't give a flying fuck how they fund it, they just need to get the goddamned thing passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. 40 days in Iraq would pay for the bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
42. Fine - then have EVERYONE fund it, not a dwindling
sub-group.

That's just fiscal common sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Sounds great. Let's actually get a bill passed first, then we can alternate the funding - okay?
But we won't get ANYTHING for these kids if we don't pass SOMETHING.

Remember the Fed Gov't can find the money, no matter what effect tobacco taxes have, it won't hurt SCHIP.

I mean, where exactly is all the money for Halliburton, Blackwater, etc., etc. coming from?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. From everyone.
I think it should have been reworked to come from income taxes, myself. Everyone pays them except for the truly poor who would most benefit from this program.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. Great. But do you agree we should get the bill passed first? Like we did with Medicare? -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
45. Does it matter that they're funding it on the back of people
who are dwindling by the day or who will resort in purchasing their tobacco on the black market, thus leaving the fund largly unfunded?

I'm all for the SCHIP program and, like you, I'd rather they use some of that defense budget, which we all contribute to, but I don't see the point in funding it by taxing one product, a product which is not necessary and, therefore, doesn't have to be purchased - or (more likely) will be purchased overseas online so that state and federal taxes can be avoided.

One can only tax one product so much before we reach the point of diminishing returns. Hell, that's basic economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. That argument does not hold water, sorry. SCHIP will never go unfunded because tobacco taxes dry up
That dog won't hunt.
Find some other reason to vote against giving 10 million kids access to healthcare.

If you are really concerned with this smoke & mirrors argument, read up on the actual bill, read up on the state/national collection of gas/tobacco taxes, and then, most importantly, read up on how we passed & funded historical programs like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

It will allay your fears completely.

There is absolutely NO GOOD REASON our children should be denied this coverage - NOT ONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SparkyMac Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Get it passed first ...
..and then worry about how it is funded. You make a good point that it shouldn't rely on sin taxes. Maybe after next election we can fund it out of general revenue. But we must get it passed or lose it altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks.
I "dugg" the story to try to bring more attention to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. Has Dennis Kucinich said he'll vote to override?
His reason for opposing SCHIP was very different from the 5 on your list, but I hope he's committed to vote to override a veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
33. Shhhh...we're not allowed to talk about that.
"DK's reason is pure, so leave him alone!"

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zandor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. Disgraceful
Hard to consider these folks Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. They can vote for war funds, but not sick kids? WTF?
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. I like Gene Taylor! Remember when he called the insurance companies..
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 07:12 AM by Joanne98
child molesters? I wonder why he's voting against. That's too bad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
12. The bill needs to cover legal immigrant children in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. True, but this is NOT why these people do not support the bill.
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 07:22 AM by Mass
Kucinich has apparently said that he would vote to override the veto.

The people who are against that are those from tobacco states. At this point, the discussion is not whether immigrant kids will get S-CHIP (we already lost this battle), but whether or not native kids will get it. I am all for supporting S-CHIP for all kids or even better for single-payer healthcare, but this is not what this battle is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Made no claims. I don't support it for it's discriminatory features.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. So, it would be better to let all kids without medical care? Good for you.
Happy to see Kucinich disagree and will vote to override the veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Straw dog.
I'm actually one of those for a national system. Who's going to be discriminated against in future bills? The learning disabled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. So, you will be apparently satisfied if the veto is not overriden.
This actually will mean that less kids will get healthcare, because the House will negotiate for LESS care, not MORE. For 2 reps who voted NO to get the bill better, many others voted NO to get the bill worse. But, I guess that makes you happy, because you think these people all of a sudden will want more.

I totally agree with Kucinich's vote, but, at some point, something has to be voted. If you care about people, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. I think accepting discrimination at this point is a bad idea.
People only think of themselves. When one is discriminated against so the majority of others can receive something of value, we all lose in the long run. Let's appeal to our better natures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. While just a few may die in the short run...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. The perfect is the enemy of the good. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #30
39. I'm damn glad you weren't around when Medicare got passed. Or Medicaid. Or Social Security.
Which were all programs that were greatly expanded once we got the damn things passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
34. That's good news about DK - where'd you hear it?
Do you have a link?

I don't think he should have voted against it in the first place but if he votes to override, I might be able to get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. So, they just should scrap expanding SCHIP
to millions of children because they don't have the votes to include legal immigrant children? And don't even start with the garbage that not having the votes is not a valid reason. In this case, it absolutely is. Yes, it's a shame that the votes are not there, but politics is largely about the art of the possible. Get this through and THEN add illegal immigrant children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Yes.
It needs modification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Happy to see Kucinich disagrees with you. And the guys who are listed here are against it
because of tobacco taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. I'm beginning to accrue a fair amount of contempt
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 08:18 AM by cali
for those willing to sacrifice millions of children for their own purer than thou ideology.

Thank goodness, Dennis' vote against it was merely symbolic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #27
40. Me too. They're assholes, no matter which way you cut it. Stupid too. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. Hmmm. I'm really surprised by Gene Taylor's vote.
I have a lot of respect for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Tobacco states?
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 07:20 AM by Mass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
46. huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. Taylor is voting against it because he comes from a tobacco state and opposes
the tobacco taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. I wasn't aware that Mississippi was a tobacco state.
Lived there most of my life and I know Gene Taylor personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Here - Taylor voted against it because of the tobacco tax.
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 06:40 PM by Mass
http://public.cq.com/docs/cqt/news110-000002593637.html

Persuading those eight Democrats and Watson to vote to override Bush is one thing. One of them, Gene Taylor of Mississippi, said, “I’ll listen,” if Democratic leaders come looking for his vote. Taylor said he voted against the bill because of a tobacco tax increase that he feels would fall too heavily on the poor.
...


He said it himself. Not a word about universal healthcare or immigrant children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Tobacco "use" tax not from growing tobacco.
This is a tax increase in people who use tobacco not people who grow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Whatever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
17. You forgot Kucinich, who voted against the bill as well:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. This is NOT about who voted against the bill, but who will NOT vote to override the veto,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Has he stated that he will vote for the override?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Huh?
So this is just a pissing match with the President? SCHIP is just a vehicle to win a battle?

The OP says it's about voting against SCHIP. NOT about the veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. This is about overriding the veto, so that the bill can pass.
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 07:35 AM by Mass
Not a pissing match, a death and life issue for some kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Someone upthread just wrote that Dennis will vote to override
the veto- and in my book that lets him off the hook. And the reason he voted against it (one I don't agree with) was that it didn't cover illegal immigrant children. Slightly different from those listed in the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. Good. Now he will be able to say he voted against it before he voted for it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. Without any change to the bill.
Making that a whole lot different than the context of Kerry's infamous statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Good thing the Republicans won't be able to hammer Kucinich on that in the general election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
37. Good luck getting North Carolina
representatives to vote for a bill that taxes tobacco so heavily.

Hopefully the veto will not be overridden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #37
43. So, you are against giving 10 million kids access to healthcare because you're PRO TOBACCO? -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #43
56. No, I'm not against 10 million kids getting access to
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 08:50 PM by BlackVelvet04
health care. I am against it being funded solely by tobacco taxes. I don't mind a small tax increase on tobacco as long as there is an equal tax on other things to fund the health care.

And the reality is that North Carolina depends heavily on tobacco for it's revenue so it's congressman aren't going to vote for a large tax increase on tobacco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
55. Im glad my children will be covered under this.
Fuck the children who aren't covered! Sometimes things cant be perfect so if someone has to be shit on so others can benefit at least its not my children, so who cares.:sarcasm:

What a country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC