Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State Department Hired Corrupt Contractor To Build U.S. Embassy In Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:29 PM
Original message
State Department Hired Corrupt Contractor To Build U.S. Embassy In Iraq
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 12:30 PM by kpete
State Department Hired Corrupt Contractor To Build U.S. Embassy In Iraq

The State Department has come under intense criticism recently for its lavish $592-million embassy in Iraq. The embassy complex will have a staff of 1,000 people and operating costs will total $1.2 billion a year.

At a July hearing, the State Department official overseeing the construction assured Congress that the project was “on schedule and on budget” and bragged about the “extremely high quality of construction.” Yet the cost of the embassy is now expected to be $144 million more than projected and the opening of the embassy, set for September, has been delayed because of severe construction problems.

Today, House Oversight Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) wrote to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and raised concerns about the “substandard work” done by the prime contractor, First Kuwaiti General Trading & Contracting Company. Waxman’s investigation has uncovered not only poor workmanship — widespread defects in fire detection systems and electrical wiring — but also a past record of corruption that the State Deparment may have purposefully overlooked:

The Kickback Scheme: Wadih El Absi, the managing Partner of First Kuwaiti, “personally engaged” in a $13-million kickback scheme with a major U.S. contractor in Iraq in 2003 “in order to obtain subcontracts.”

Overcharges: Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) documents show that in 2005, First Kuwaiti may have overcharged the government on a subcontract to “provide living containers to the U.S. military.” DCAA found that First Kuwaiti was charging over 260 percent “the median cost charged by its supplier.”


Waxman’s investigation underscores that the State Department’s inability to regulate Blackwater was not an isolated incident. As Waxman notes in his letter, “Based on the information the Committee has received, I do not understand why the State Department would rely upon First Kuwaiti to build the largest embassy in the world. … Increasingly, it appears that the State Department’s efforts in Iraq are in disarray.”

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/09/embassy-waxman/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rec'd! I understand outrage overload, but this should not be acceptable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. An undersurprised kick. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Halliburton Watch's web site has loads of info about this issue
Every bit of it a nightmare for Iraqis and US taxpayers and another underreported uber scandal from our corrupt administration. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hmmm. Could it be our own State Dept. is involved in a kickback scheme?
A kickback scheme involving taxpayer funds? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. blackwater has a lifetime job protecting the 1,000 employees
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well of course they're corrupt
Can you think of one honest person who is associated with Bushco?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. BushCo=corruption. Next question? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Damn it we've been telling them for years......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. what would really be news is if they hired
an honest one after a fair bidding process
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC