rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:05 PM
Original message |
Poll question: ROUND 5--Who do you NOT want to see get the Democratic nomination? |
|
I cannot edit a poll to let you know that another round is coming. I still see that Round 2 is getting hits because of the recs to the greatest page. If you don't mind, let's get the rest to the greatest page for the most exposure. And, please keep kicked. Having said that:
UPDATE: Round 1--Hillary was eliminated by a strong majority of 61%---Round 2--Dennis was eliminated with a plurality of 33%----Round 3--Mike was eliminated with a majority of 54%
ROUND 4 Results-- Barack Obama is eliminated with a plurality of 44%
FOUR CANDIDATES REMAIN: Again, the reminder: I'm going to post a poll asking you to vote for the person you LEAST desire to get the Democratic nomination for POTUS. The winner (who will actually be the loser) will be dropped from the list, and I'll post another poll with that candidate's name removed. I will repeat the process, until, by elimination, one candidate is "chosen" by those participating.
Remember vote for the one you DON'T want to get the nomination. I'd appreciate if you will keep this kicked. I'm doing an experiment. The candidates are presented in alphabetical order.
Of those remaining who do you want to eliminate from getting the nomination? Again, in alphabetical order:
|
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message |
1. keep it kicked and recommended. Thanks. |
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:10 PM
Original message |
shamelessly kicking again. Thanks. nt |
TransitJohn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message |
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
Flabbergasted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message |
againes654
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message |
againes654
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Dodd received several votes in the early rounds, but is not getting many votes now. That is interesting.
|
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. So far, my hypothesis is holding up. |
|
After these polls, I'm posting one more to see if people agree with my interpretation.
|
againes654
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. Ok, but I am waiting to go to lunch |
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
17. LOL. One vote could make the difference! :D |
Demeter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
bonito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
TwilightZone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
10. rateyes - just wanted to say that this is a rather thought-provoking exercise |
|
I think it will alter the assumptions that a lot of people make about DU, including my own.
|
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. I'm finding the answers interesting... |
damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message |
11. At this point, who cares? |
|
Given who has been eliminated, I don't.
|
againes654
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. Then feel free to leave |
|
Why do those that don't agree with this poll just not look at it. Why do they feel the need to belittle? Does it make you feel better to put others down?
|
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
15. Thanks for your opinion...that actually helps me in |
|
putting together my hypothesis.
|
Justyce
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message |
12. It looks like John Edwards will make the top 3 "least offensive". |
skipos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I am surprised Obama was voted off the island so quickly. nt |
robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
23. the island!!!!!!!!! good one. |
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
25. Yeah, we should call this the SURVIVOR polls. nt |
cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
19. How soon is Biden done yet? |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 01:31 PM by calipendence
|
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
22. I'm going to give it a few more minutes... |
|
I want to leave each round up for at least half an hour...unless the vote is close, in which case I'll leave it up longer.
|
robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Now it's getting harder. I would take any of these guys as pres. |
robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
21. rattie, I think i know what your hypothesis is..... |
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
24. Well, I'll reveal it at the end... |
|
and, I bet you do, too. :hi:
|
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
26. ROUND 6 HAS STARTED....link here: |
skyblue
(724 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-10-07 07:20 AM
Response to Original message |
27. NYC lawyer (Ghoul) vs Southern Lawyer. My guess is NYC lawyer wins. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:50 AM
Response to Original message |