Lochloosa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 07:17 AM
Original message |
Radar Magaizine...this is so wrong... |
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 07:18 AM
Response to Original message |
1. why are only the dems naked? |
Lochloosa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Actually Hillary is turning me on...
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. It's a takeoff on the Tom Ford/Vanity Fair Hollywood cover |
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
meegbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. What does a gay fashion designer with 2 nude female models ... |
|
have to do with the 2008 Presidential election?
What metaphor am I missing here? :shrug:
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. Because they tested a version with naked Guliani on a focus group... |
lapfog_1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. They also tested a version with a naked Fred Thompson... |
|
but that was deemed to be a WMD.
|
Dr. Strange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
Wang of Minuscule Dimension?
|
flashl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
Zywiec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 08:34 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Hillary is looking good!! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:35 AM
Response to Original message |