"Tom Lantos, the committee's chairman, had opened the debate by admitting the resolution posed a "sobering" choice.
"We have to weigh the desire to express our solidarity with the Armenian people... against the risk that it could cause young men and women in the uniform of the United States armed services to pay an even heavier price than they are currently paying," he said.
Mr Lantos, a survivor of the Jewish Holocaust, said he would introduce a resolution praising US-Turkish friendship next week, according to AFP news agency." I don't really understand why this resolution was introduced now. It troubles me that we may possibly be escalating the war in the Middle East, while, at the same time, we SHOULD put pressure on Turkey to admit that it was, in fact, genocide. I think that there are definitely other things the Congress could be doing with their time. The Bush Administration says they object to this, but, truthfully, I don't think it's for the reasons they say. I think they would be happy to keep the war going and going and going. They just don't want to have to attack Turkey, which isn't fundamentalist like Iran. But I'm pretty sure they don't care about "hurting the war on terror", except in the small fact that no one else is going to help us attack Turkey. We already let them get away with bombing the Kurds.
So, what I'm really confused about is... why now? What possible gain do we get out of this that will outweigh the possible detriments we may get from approving this?
(And no, I'm not a Bush apologist, nor am I cruel, heartless, or revising history) It was a genocide. It was the worst genocide, next to the Holocaust, in history. But why now?
Edited to add Tom Lantos' entire statement:
http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/press_display.asp?id=430