Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ronald Reagan on George W. Bush: Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 02:19 PM
Original message
Ronald Reagan on George W. Bush: Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
Edited on Thu Oct-11-07 02:20 PM by malaise
Quote of the Day:

"A moment I've been dreading. George brought his ne're-do-well son around
this morning and asked me to find the kid a job. Not the political one who lives in Florida . The one who hangs around here all the time looking shiftless. This so-called kid is already almost 40 and has never had a real job. Maybe I'll call Kinsley over at The New Republic and see if they'll hire him as a contributing editor or something. That looks like easy work."

-- From the REAGAN DIARIES. The entry is dated May 17, 1986.
----------
KO needs this :rofl:

May be a hoax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 02:20 PM
Original message
Umm check this out.It is a spoof. Not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just discovered that
Damn what a pity. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. OMG - Priceless!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. unfotunately , it IS a hoax. pretty believable though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. A hoax, already debunked. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Who debunked it?
I'm not happy with Snopes right now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Ditto
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Check out my convo w/Barbara at Snopes below... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Why are you not happy with snopes?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Check this out...
Edited on Thu Oct-11-07 02:57 PM by Juniperx
On another DU thread, there is a recruit Gore question on the CBS.com website... so I go vote. I see the comments section, in which a RWNutJob posts this link to Snopes. It's an article on Gore's house using twice the energy of the "average" American home. The story cites dollar figures spent on energy, nothing more. Snopes says it's a "true" story. So I comment...

Comment: http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/house.asp

All of your sources are from books written about Bush's house. Have you
even asked anyone who works for Gore about this issue?

There are several things I can point out right off the bat: Gore's house
is used as an office; there are many people working and living there. The
energy used there is "green" energy, which costs a LOT more than regular
varieties. Your article uses the cost factors ONLY in your calculations.

I humbly protest your use of "true" in this article. There is no evidence
that you used sources other than Bush sources. This just isn't right.
_______________________________________________________________________________

So, I IMMEDIATELY get this response:


It's covered in our FAQ at http://www.snopes.com/info/faq.asp

Many of the texts we discuss contain a mixture of truth, falsity,
and exaggeration which cannot be accurately described by a single
"True" or "False" rating. Therefore, an item's status is generally
based upon the single most important aspect of the text under
discussion, which is summarized in the statement made after the
"Claim:" heading at the top of the page. It is important to make
note of the wording of that claim, since that is the statement to
which the status applies.

Additional information about Mr. Gore's house is available in our other
article, clearly linked on the page to which you refer.

- Barbara

Urban Legends Reference Pages
http://www.snopes.com

_________________________________________________________________________


To which I reply... Those additional links are saying the same thing. Still noting the dollar amount spent with no regard to the type of energy. And as I said before, there are no comments or explanations from the Gore camp, or anyone else who can validate the extremely expensive use of "green" energy... only the dollar amounts, nothing more.

Who keeps Snopes honest? The answer is: Nobody.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Great response Juniperx
Keep them honest. :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I've heard nothing from her since...
just crickets:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'm betting you didn't expect a response
Edited on Thu Oct-11-07 04:50 PM by malaise
:D
Sp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Nope... I secretly hoped there wouldn't be one...
'Cuz that means I won! heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's a hoax and also too clever for Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PollThis Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. If it is a hoax It's the one time Reagan didn't say what was on his mind. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Too perceptive for St. Ronnie
My guess is if the two of them ever hanged out, it would be like Beavis and Butthead. Any coincidence the two of them took more vacation time during their respective presidencies than any other office holder? I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. Ronnie was too busy drooling in his soup to notice Boobya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC