Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RawStory: Senate preparing to fold on telecom immunity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 04:53 PM
Original message
RawStory: Senate preparing to fold on telecom immunity
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Senate_preparing_to_fold_on_telecom_1011_af.html

Senate preparing to fold on telecom immunity


This week's much touted rebuke to immunity-seeking telecommunications companies may be scrapped as Senate Democrats are appearing ever more ready to accede to President Bush's demands.

Reports are emerging that the Senate is preparing to introduce a foreign surveillance law update that would shield telecommunications companies from litigation or prosecution over their assistance in the National Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping program instituted after Sept. 11.

Based on a tip from the ACLU, Firedoglake reported a draft proposal being quietly circulated in the Senate "does contain legal immunity/amnesty for the telecom companies" that would include any of its actions over the last six years.

President Bush vowed Wednesday not to sign a bill that doesn't spare prosecution for the telecommunications industry, and House Democratic leaders have indicated they may grant immunity if Bush's administration agrees to detail the companies' involvement in the wiretapping program.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Senate_preparing_to_fold_on_telecom_1011_af.html

:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
earthboundmisfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. WHY?
WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY, GODDAMN IT??????????????????? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why? Why do they always fold when their constituency is backing them all the way
on standing firm against giving into the demands of the Boy King and the telecommunications industires?

When most of the citizens of this country are backing them all the way on standing firm against the demands of the Boy King?

What does the White House have on these guys or what do they hold over their heads which makes them capitulate almost every time?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. K & R. What a surprise. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. 70 Years of precident
A quick review of eavesdropping reveals why.

http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2007/10/domestic_taps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. sounds about right
they won't stop until the Bill of Rights is 100% null and void
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow, I'm shocked. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, they have to be "tough on terra" to protect our freedoms(?).
Or, perhaps, maybe, an outside chance, that they're playing politics. Naawwww...they wouldn't do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Of course they will. Because they know the dem sheeple will still
vote for them next time around.

Fuck the PEOPLE they don't really count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fuck. We're back to where we were two days ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Harry Reid=worst Dem Majority Leader EVER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. What a shocker! I wonder if they have...
a formula they follow to determine how long to wait before folding.

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. Next time they'll give Pukes immunity when murdering Dems.
It's all coming together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. is the "senate folding" breaking news anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Reality
this is part of the power in washington that does not go up for election..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_Law_Enforcement_Act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. The origami contingent folds again
No surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. As usual, follow the money:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. So, where is there something substantive in this tale of horror?
Watch the House Committee hearing on C-Span. This idea was proposed as an amendment by the Rs and soundly trounced!

House Judiciary Cmte. Mark Up of FISA
Chair. John Conyers (D-MI) holds a House Judiciary Cmte. mark up of pending legislation, including the draft of a bill updating the rules for electronic surveillance. This new bill would replace one passed in August that expires next year.
10/10/2007: WASHINGTON, DC: 2 hr. 43 min.

http://c-span.org/VideoArchives.asp?CatCodePairs=,&ArchiveDays=100&Page=3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
18. sickening.
why are they so afraid to confront this POS * ? Nancy Pelosi does not look so good either, something is up with her. She looks like she was spooked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. MORE: FISA “RESTORE” thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. BILL: Responsible Electronic Surveillance that is Overseen, Reviewed, and Effective
H.R. 3773, The Responsible Electronic Surveillance that is Overseen, Reviewed, and Effective Act of 2007 (RESTORE)
Bill text = http://judiciary.house.gov/Media/PDFS/HR3773FISA.pdf

RESTORE Act Summary of H.R. 3773, http://judiciary.house.gov/Media/PDFS/HR3773FISASummary.pdf

A Comparison between the RESTORE Act and the Protect America Act of 2007 (PAA)
http://judiciary.house.gov/Media/PDFS/RESTOREvPAA.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC