Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here we go again: Cheney admitted that he could have prevented 9/11 but didn't!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:50 PM
Original message
Here we go again: Cheney admitted that he could have prevented 9/11 but didn't!
Edited on Thu Oct-11-07 07:18 PM by BuyingThyme
Cheney Cites Justifications For Domestic Eavesdropping
Secret Monitoring May Have Averted 9/11, He Says

By Jim VandeHei and Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, January 5, 2006; Page A02

Vice President Cheney said yesterday that the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks might have been prevented if the Bush administration had had the power to secretly monitor conversations involving two of the hijackers without court orders.

As part of an effort to sell Americans on the administration's recently disclosed program to eavesdrop on telephone and e-mail communications between the United States and people overseas without a warrant, Cheney told a small group of conservatives at the Heritage Foundation that instead of being able to "pick up" on the terrorist plot "we didn't know they were here plotting until it was too late."

...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/04/AR2006010400973.html


leveymg (1000+ posts)

Court Papers: NSA Warrantless wiretapping, "The Program", started pre-9/11.

Edited on Thu Oct-11-07 05:39 PM by leveymg

The Rocky Mountain News reports today that in early 2001, Qwest, a Denver-based wireless telecom company, pulled out of a major NSA program believing the spy agency was involved in illegal domestic operations. See, http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/tech/article/0,27...

That project, Project Groundbreaker, was awarded on July 31, 2001 to Verizon and a consortium of telcos and defense contractors. Groundbreaker effectively privatized NSA surveillance. Ever since, most of the NSA's domestic wiretapping and intelligence analysis function has been performed by the same telephone and high-tech companies for which some in Congress are now seeking a grant of immunity for massive warrantless wiretapping.

...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2023410#2024255


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=125&topic_id=67153
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=226611
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/011306Z.shtml
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2023997
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. No...It's more like just becuase you ARE illegally spying doesn't mean that it would do any good to
stop an attack.

So, I say, why do it, why allow it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Then how did he know the attacks could have been thwarted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Because, he says if they had been spying, they could have been thwarted.
But, according to your second story, apparently they were.

So they were spying, but they weren't thwarted.

There's also a big "could" in there as a weasel word.

(I take your point, it's all just repuke bs anyway you cut it.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Because if we'd given Cheney all the power he wanted, he wouldn't have ordered the attack

Sounds simple to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Excellent comeback!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because a PDB entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Attack in the U.S." just didn't do it.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, it appears that they were
and they didn't. Criminals all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. go cheney yourself mr cheney
he must be astounded that the democrats still buy that 'soft of terrorism' bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. THIS IS HUGH!!11! Rate it UP!!!!1!!!11 These are HIGH CRIMES, people.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. They're not spying on terra-ists. They're spying on libruls and other enemies.
:wow:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ahpook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. The lies are getting terrible.
Edited on Thu Oct-11-07 07:13 PM by Ahpook
I hope any fucking idiot can see through this garbage

That's the part that is worrying me the most. They don't even care to lie GOOD anymore.

And if they could spy they could have stopped it? Anyone else see a problem in there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. They already had UNTRANSLATED EVIDENCE!
They could have done all the wiretapping in the world but wouldn't have had enough Arabic speakers to make sense of it all.

Raw data collection is one thing, ANALYSIS is quite another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Cheney says he may have been able to handle it.
Actually, he says he could have. I guess he didn't feel like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Guess he had a bird hunt that weekend
It's HARD WORK vice-presidentin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Too busy with the maps of Iraq's oil fields n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. Also, two of the "alleged" hijackers were on the FBI's 24 Hour Watch List . . ..
yet they supposedly bought tickets for these flights in their own names using credit cards !!!!

Are they stupid or are we --- ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. And Putin had a list of the hijackers names and the plans to hit skyscrapers . . .
he finally went to the United Nations with the info because he was so concerned that Bush was ignoring it ---

The United Nations Security Council in August 2001 sent representatives to the White House and to our intelligence agencies with the information . . . .

Just as many other nations had been doing for months and months ---!!!!

Still . . . OPERATION IGNORE --

There's only one conclusion that can be drawn from this ignorning of intelligence. . . .
including what Richard Clarke was telling Bush -- and others telling Ashcroft --
Ashcroft told them NOT to come back talking about terrorists again!!!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InternalDialogue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. He's right.
The FISA court never would have approved a warrant to tap conversations between plotting terrorists.

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. .erom ecnO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC