FREEPERS GONE WILD: Al Gores Nobel Peace Prize

[niceypoo]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1910209/posts">As if we couldn't see this one coming...

To: radar101
What award has become most meaningless in you lifetime?

* 1. The Nobel Peace Prize?
* 2. Time’s “Man of The Year”?

Tough choice

2 posted on 10/12/2007 4:58:54 AM PDT by Tarpon
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

*snip*

To: Tarpon
Congratulations algore, you are now at least as fine and good and noble as Yassir Arafat.

5 posted on 10/12/2007 5:00:13 AM PDT by Petronski (Congratulations Tribe! AL Central Champs)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies >

*snip*

To: radar101
Should Rush ask for a recount?

(shades of 2000)

9 posted on 10/12/2007 5:02:29 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

*snip* Too funny, in their decayed minds Limbaugh was in the running...


--And I cannot leave out this gem...

To: Tarpon
They ought to rename the Nobel Peace prize. Something like the “Liberal Fleece Prize”.

When was the last time a conservative was awarded this item?

19 posted on 10/12/2007 5:14:10 AM PDT by Dudoight
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies >


and on...

and on...

...you get the gist

[bdamomma]

1. the righties are going wild too I bet.

toooo bad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Tesha]

2. Perhaps you can summarize it for those of us who hate to step in Freepdoo? (NT)

[Tesha]

19. Thanks! (NT)

[johnnie]

3. Fuck 'em n/t

[Ganja Ninja]

4. I thought they were all out stalking a 12 year old just out of a coma

[Tesla]

7. I can't stand going over there, freeperville is like watching Deliverence!

Creeps me out!

[hlthe2b]

12. Gee, what is it about

heavy inbreeding...... that appalls you? :rofl:

[originalpckelly]

14. It's buying them cards.

Fuck, what do you get someone when their sister is their mother and their aunt and grandmother all at once?

[hlthe2b]

16. Gee, Hallmark! Get on that, will ya?

LOL

[zabet]

17. I don't go over there because,

who likes swimming in the shallow end
of the gene pool? :puke:

[DrDan]

24. well - I think your post insults all in-breeders around the world . . .

[Tesla]

31. I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings... but.....SQUEEEEEEL!!!

[lonestarnot]

27. Yeah me too. That takes lots of time I would imagine.

[tsuki]

5. Scum. Bitter scum. n/t

[still_one]

6. What would you expect from people who belong to an anti-science, anti-education, and

anti-humanitarian party?

[monmouth]

8. I was just over there and they are imploding, bring up Yassar Arrafat (sp?)

and Jimmy Carter, blah, blah. They're more upset that the disgusting rumor from the National Enquirer re the Edwards is not true.... Thank you God that got stopped on a dime. Now questioning "how ill Elizabeth really is" and other disgusting ramblings. They really are miserable people, and when they're "losing" it brings out the worse I've seen in a long time.

[spanone]

9. they're confused by the word 'peace'

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

10. Well, of course.

Those idiots are absolutely predictable. Al Gore gets a Nobel prize; that means the prize is a meaningless accolade bestowed by a bunch of tree-hugging Scandinavian socialists who also awarded it to commie pinko hippies like Nelson Mandela, Jimmy Carter and Martin Luther King. Therefore it is worthless. Of course, if some right-wing "hero" like Bush had won, it would be a whole 'nother story. But, of course, righties never win *peace* prizes, for obvious reasons.

[onehandle]

11. How nice. They got off their sisters long enough to be idiots. nt

[originalpckelly]

13. Ozone Man's Revenge.

Eat that BUSH! HAHAHAHAHAHA!

[Joey Liberal]

21. That's a great line! n/t

[Nitrogenica]

15. I'm sure they're posting his address and his childrens addresses

the addresses of Gore's relatives and any other info they can use to terrorize his family.

They are truly sick.

[Raejeanowl]

18. It Gives Me Profound Joy

To know that Al's accomplishment is significant and far-reaching enough to IMMEDIATELY provoke the campaign for dis-accreditation.

[Joey Liberal]

20. Fuck em all! Al Gore is my President! n/t

[DrDan]

22. why do they hate America so much?

[Libby2]

23. Good, I hope their fucking heads explode.

[Ganja Ninja]

25. Bwhahahahaha!

That's Yassir Arafat 1 and Ronald Reagan 0. You lose again Freepers!

[Loge23]

26. It's okay, Freeps. You get the Nobrain prize.

What I can never understand is why the righterrists continue to wage war on virtually everything and everyone that they disagree with (that's just about the entire rest of the universe right there!).

The moron-n-thief in DC is way beyond any sensible defense at this point. The tactics of intimidation - extended even to a 12 year old - along with the fringes' apparent vehement objection to peace, diplomacy, human rights, American democratic principles, environmental responsibility, and plain ol' logic is equally beyond defense or comprehension.

While I shake my head at the carnage of the opposition, I am grateful that they destroyed themselves from within. Their rage has consumed not only themselves, but all of their "guiding principles" - some of which we were at least once able to respectfully disagree with. But now, all bets are off.

Guess it's time for love it leave it, Freeps. Enjoy your "liberal-free" world. There's a name for that sort of thing, you know. Can you spell T-O-T-A-L-I-T-A-R-I-A-N-I-S-M ???

[mwb970]

28. Wikipedia has your answer!

What I can never understand is why the righterrists continue to wage war on virtually everything and everyone that they disagree with (that's just about the entire rest of the universe right there!).

Right-wing authoritarianism

Right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) is a psychological personality variable or "ideological attitude" found to a high degree in people who are authoritarian followers (Authoritarian leaders, on the other hand, tend to score highly in social dominance orientation.)(Source: Altemeyer, 1998)

Right-wing authoritarianism is defined as the co-existence of three attitudinal clusters in a person:

1. Authoritarian submission — a high degree of submission to the authorities who are perceived to be established and legitimate in the society in which one lives.
2. Authoritarian aggression — a general aggressiveness, directed against various persons, that is perceived to be sanctioned by established authorities.
3. Conventionalism — a high degree of adherence to the social conventions that are perceived to be endorsed by society and its established authorities. (Source: Altemeyer, 1996, Chapter 1)

The "RWA" trait is measured by an attitude scale creatively named the RWA scale. The first item on the scale goes, "Our country desperately needs a mighty leader who will do what has to be done to destroy the radical new ways and sinfulness that are ruining us." Persons who strongly agree with this are showing a lot of authoritarian submission ("Our country desperately needs a mighty leader"), authoritarian aggression ("who will do what has to be done to destroy"), and conventionalism ("the radical new ways and sinfulness that are ruining us").

The "right-wing" in right-wing authoritarianism does not refer to someone's politics but to his personality. It means the person has a strong need to submit to those he considers the established authorities in society. Those authorities can have right-wing or left-wing political views. In North America, persons who score highly on the RWA scale tend to support conservative political parties when they take an interest in politics. But in the Soviet Union, high RWAs tended to support the Communist Party--which most people consider a very left-wing political movement. (Source: Altemeyer, 1996, Chapters 1 and 5) Another kind of personality, the "left-wing authoritarian," submits to authorities who want to overthrow the established authorities. But (perhaps naturally) it is harder to find such people. (Source: Altemeyer, 1996, Chapter 9).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_authoritarianism

Attitudinal cluster #2 accounts for the vitriolic personal attacks on anyone who expresses a dissenting opinion. As we have seen so often, right-wingers typically ignore the substance of the message, and instead fiercely and angrily attack the messenger.

[Loge23]

30. Very interesting! Thank you! (eom)

[sarge43]

29. Awww, poor babies11111

Their panties in one hugh bunch? That's series. :nopity:

[Shandris]

32. They need a dictionary

They ought to rename the Nobel Peace prize. Something like the “Liberal Fleece Prize”.

When was the last time a conservative was awarded this item?

When was the last time you could intelligently use the words 'conservative' and 'peace', linked together, in the same sentence? :P

[Supersedeas]

33. true American patriots -- celebrating the accomplishments of other Americans??

[AnotherGreenWorld]

34. Stupid freepers.

"When was the last time a conservative was awarded this item?"

When was the last time a conservative did something positive for humanity?

[iamthebandfanman]

35. i like the how many conservatives post

as if the NP people are bias...




nah it couldnt be that conservatives rarely stand for anything , let alone truth in science.... and gosh knows it couldnt be because they MAKE NO PROGRESS for the good mankind...
its kinda in their name.
conservative means no change after all.
you hafta be progressive to accomplish something good for a whole planet.
they think in the box, we think outside of it.
thats how it works.

[Cobalt Violet]

36. "When was the last time a conservative was awarded this item?"

I thought conservatives where against affirmative action.