Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Qwest was targeted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 09:30 AM
Original message
Qwest was targeted
Edited on Fri Oct-12-07 09:43 AM by SHRED
---

A very important issue flying underneath the radar of the mainstream.
In fact the mainstream Telcomm industry is now lobbying Congress hard to be forgiven for it's FISA violations when they cooperated illegally with Bush and opened their records to the government.

Qwest stands up for our 4th Amendment and they are being targeted by Bush's justice Department.
The lawbreakers will buy their way out and Qwest will suffer.

Remember:
This was early 2001 BEFORE 9-11 attacks.
The Bushies wanted spy powers before 9-11 ever happened.
This is alarming.

Real conservatives join with liberals on this privacy issue while the neocon fascist apologists run around brainwashed by the corporate media.



---

Documents: Qwest was targeted
'Classified info' was not allowed at ex-CEO's trial

By Sara Burnett And Jeff Smith, Rocky Mountain News
October 11, 2007

The National Security Agency and other government agencies retaliated against Qwest because the Denver telco refused to go along with a phone spying program, documents released Wednesday suggest.

The documents indicate that likely would have been at the heart of former CEO Joe Nacchio's so-called "classified information" defense at his insider trading trial, had he been allowed to present it.

The secret contracts - worth hundreds of millions of dollars - made Nacchio optimistic about Qwest's future, even as his staff was warning him the company might not make its numbers, Nacchio's defense attorneys have maintained. But Nacchio didn't present that argument at trial.

The documents suggest U.S. District Judge Edward Nottingham refused to allow Nacchio to present the argument about retaliation. Nottingham also said Nacchio would have to take the stand to raise the classified defense.


http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/tech/article/0,2777,DRMN_23910_5719566,00.html


---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. This needs to be kicked to the top
We need to re-post this if it gets lost in the shuffle.

Very important reading here Shred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC