Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Read the Daily Howler today. Goes to show that even -winning a Nobel prize- can be spun as negative

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:24 PM
Original message
Read the Daily Howler today. Goes to show that even -winning a Nobel prize- can be spun as negative
Edited on Fri Oct-12-07 12:24 PM by jpgray
What do you do if you want to undermine the panache and dignity of winning such an award? Easy--attack, attack, attack. Doesn't matter how accurate the attacks are (see Love Canal, Swiftboat Vets for Truth, etc.) so long as you get your attack out there, and everybody reports the attack without examining its validity. Somerby includes a brief history of the Post's recent bizarre attacks on Gore:

http://www.dailyhowler.com/

1) On the front page of the Sunday Style section, the Post published an entire report about how fat he is.

2) In the increasingly daft Outlook section, the Post published a dotty opinion piece complaining about the book’s lack of foot-notes. Unfortunately, the book has 20 pages of end-notes. The citation the Post’s writer desperately sought was clearly marked there.

3) In his always-clownish “Washington Sketch,” Dana Milbank devoted an entire “sketch” to the complaint that Gore used too many big words when he gave a speech in Washington. One example: At one point, Gore had referred to the “marketplace of ideas.”

4) On the op-ed page, the Post published a column by Slate’s Emily Yoffe, who made clownish misstatements about warming science and complained that Al Gore was going to scare the children if he published a children’s version of the book, An Inconvenient Truth.

5) Also in Outlook, a piece was published gushing about how smartsexyhandsome Fred Thompson is. Among other insults (including the one to Post readers’ intelligence), the clownish piece found time to ridicule Gore as an example of “road kill.”

6) In Book World, Alan Ehrenhalt formally reviewed Gore’s book —and started with a comic-book complaint: “Al Gore possesses a skill that no other American politician can match —or would want to. He has a consistent ability to express fundamentally reasonable sentiments —often important ones —in ways that annoy the maximum possible number of people.” As of this morning, Gore has annoyed so many people that his film has won an Oscar —and he holds the Nobel Peace Prize too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. It would appear that the corporate media holds Gore in about as much contempt
as he holds them.

Of course, he has far more reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Milbank is almost as big of a smircky twit was Bush is
even though he thinks knows Bush is better than him.

Washington Post White House reporter Dana Milbank offers this reasoned, mature explanation: "Gore is sanctimonious, and that's sort of the worst thing you can be in the eyes of the press. And he has been disliked all along, and it was because he gives a sense that he's better than us--he's better than everybody, for that matter, but the sense that he's better than us as reporters. Whereas President Bush probably is sure that he's better than us--he's probably right, but he does not convey that sense.

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20021021/alterman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Milbank is an insufferable douchebag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sometimes you just have to say WTF; nobody cares about your
Edited on Fri Oct-12-07 12:30 PM by EV_Ares
childish articles where you pick out any unimportant negative you can think of.

Gore is so far above their pettiness. They can spin the fuck out of a Nobel Peace Award but the world knows what it is about and it is not awarded to little petty jerks like those that write that crap.

Al Gore is one in a million and while Bush lays awake at night wondering about his legacy. Al is sleeping like a baby knowing what his will be and all the good he has done for us all and still has time to do more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Denigrate/Distort /Discredit/Disdain /Distract/etc This is what the GOP do...this is ALL THEY DO
They are stuck on the Minutiae...the Moot, and the Small...

They never venture into the Big Picture because ....they cannot....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You can nitpick anything and anyone, and the nitpicking doesn't have to be accurate to get coverage
And the forum the RNC gets for nitpicking is exponentially larger than the accuracy of their attacks would appear to justify. Who makes that decision to give such disingenuous tripe such wide coverage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Control and you can Predict...to FOOL is to RULE.....we got had....by the GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC