Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader won what, 2% of the vote? Sheehan would get about the same hypothetically.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:53 PM
Original message
Nader won what, 2% of the vote? Sheehan would get about the same hypothetically.
Carry on Clinton bashers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nader polled 2.74%
And that was enough to cost Al Gore the election that he rightfully won. Nader's hopeless campaign made it close enough for Bush to steal.

I can't see Cindy Sheehan having that same effect in Nancy Pelosi's district, and the Republican would not win more than 20% of the vote either. Nancy wins with at least 60%.

Please tell me Cindy is not going to run for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ralph Nader was on the supreme court?
I didn't realize Ralph Nader ruled in favor of Bush in Bush Vs. Gore.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. There are many reasons why Gore "lost" in 2000
The SC is, of course, the main one. But Nader certainly didn't help. Had Gore won NH four electoral votes he would have won and it can be said that Nader cost Gore NH. Of course who can say if the Nader voters would have voted for Gore had Nader not run? But there is a good chance enough of them may have. Florida is another case in point for the same reason.

But Gore, himself, made some miscalculations. He wrote off Ohio too early and lost the state by a small margin. He lost his own home state. If Gore had carried his own TN he would have been president.

So there we go. It can't only be blamed on Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It can't "only" be blamed on Nader-- but so what?
Most of the other factors couldn't be controlled by progessives. Nader was a progressive whose position on the ballot took 97,000 Florida votes. Surely at least 1% of them would have voted for Gore if Nader hadn't been on the ballot -- more if Nader had actually endorsed him. And 1% of Nader's votes would have been more than enough to put Gore over the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Perhaps Gore should have ran with someone like Nader, and not Joe Lieberman...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Oh, I see. Gore should have run with Nader to keep Nader from opposing
him? Sounds like extortion to me.

Nader took 97,000 votes in Florida away from another progressive candidate. He deliberately campaigned hard in the swing states, even though many of his supporters begged him not to. He's the narcissistic jerk that single-handedly did the most to put the country on the road to 8 years of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Whatever makes it easy to sleep at night. Keep telling yourself that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It wouldn't have ever gotten to the Supreme Court if Nader hadn't been
in the race. The race was decided by fewer than 600 Florida votes -- a state where Nader received more than 97,000 votes. If only 1% of Nader's voters had voted for Gore instead, the decision wouldn't have gone to the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I remember reading that Pat Buchanan had thousands more votes...
than anyone expected and that it was due to the ballot design that many people chose Buchanan by mistake. They thought they were voting for Gore.

Buchanan got more votes against all odds.

In the end, it was scotus that let loose the plaugue that has festered for 7 long years. May they pay dearly/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. But progressives couldn't control the ballot design. They could control
who they voted for -- and 97,000 chose to vote for a progressive candidate who couldn't win and who pretended that there was no difference between Gore and Bush.

It doesn't matter how many other factors affected the election. It wouldn't have ended up in the Supreme Court if less than 1% of Nader's progressive voters had decided to vote for Gore instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Good point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. More if Erik Prince and the fundies make big contributions!
Go Greens, F**k America again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. Let's split the left because that's worked so well historically.
Edited on Sat Oct-13-07 12:51 AM by sfexpat2000
We need more posts that stir this cr@P up. We haven't yet begun to sabotage 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. cindy's running for PRESIDENT? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Clintons are Republicans, miscast
that's all. Great Presidential material- both, but in the wrong party. They're to the right of Goldwater in ways. The Center has been moved way way way right in two decades by the corporate media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yes, and the comparison of Nader to Sheehan is not apt either.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. I Always Hear That Argument
Perhaps on economic issues but in 1964 abortion was illegal, condoms were illegal in many states, and a man could be put in the hoosegow for fucking another man...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. Will this be the birth of a new Dem Clenis?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
17. But 85% of Nader voters learned their lesson by 2004 and didn't vote for him again
It will be interesting to see if Nader and his supporters try to do a repeat of 2000 in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. Um, Sheehan would get 0% of the Presidential vote
I think you are getting a little carried away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. Cindy's running for president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC