Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Clintons have a symbiotic relationship

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:14 AM
Original message
The Clintons have a symbiotic relationship
Edited on Tue Oct-16-07 11:24 AM by cali
in the political realm. There's nothing surprising about this. And it isn't an indication that she's where she is due ONLY to her husband.

She's long been an accomplished and capable woman in her own right. Love her, hate her, or something between.

And one indication of her capabilities lies in her campaign. She's running an impressive one. She's not George bush who truly is in the White House simply because his family and powerful friends installed him there.

Does being married to Bill help her? Sure. Did it in her run for the Senate? Yep. But she got out there herself and ran hard for that Senate seat, and she's doing the same for the Democratic nomination.

Suggesting that her marriage with Bill is the PRIMARY reason for her political career, is incorrect, and way too simplistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well said, cali! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks, Nance.
Coming from someone who says so much well, that's a nice compliment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. All good relationships are symbiotic
Edited on Tue Oct-16-07 11:35 AM by northzax
Both parties get what they want from the other. This is just the first real rockstar political marriage in modern times, at least publically. They challenge and push eachother, she is one of the reasons he was so successful, and he is one of the reasons she is so successful. Without the other, neither would be where they are today, successful, certainly, but not this successful. Combine the two and you have a vertiable supernoca of talent, skill and ambition. they really are the smnartest people in the room, any room.

sorry for spelling...blackberry issues.

i think one reason both inspire hate is because Bill could, quite literally,, have any woman he wanted, and he chose to while straying, stay with Someone who challenges him. I really think that many women are jealous of Hillaryshe loves her husband, he loves her and they work through problems, even public humiliation. And men are threatened by both, they are thinking 'my wife would castrate me if got got a bj from a chubby intern, why doesn't she?' and wondering what it is about her that has stopped Bill from getting a Fredesque trophy wife. he is a rich, powerful, brilliant, charismatic, flawed man, what does he see in her? Awhy does he encourage and support her, that's the woman's job!

we don't have role models of rich, poerful, ambitious and successful men who encourage their wives to do the same. Power couples are almost always unequal in some way, they aren't anymore, and it scares the daylights out of people who don't think they could do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. Insightful,thought provoking post.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. Outstanding post. Thanks for your insight. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. The marriage probably stalled her political career.
She couldn't run for anything while she was a governor's, then a president's wife. Yet she never lost her cool in public, never took it out on her beautifully-raised daughter, and never engaged in self-destructive behavior.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. She overcame a lot in NY
called a carpetbegger. She had high negatives there--but now that people know her she is very well liked and her negatives in NY are not what they once were. She did all of that on her own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah, the same way Junior and Poppy are symbiotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. No. Not that you made a case
as to why they're the same.

Let's look at some differences:

Hillary Clinton- Distinguished herself aa an undergrad an in law school.

shrub: mediocre student.

Clinton politically active as a young woman.

shrub: no.

Clinton: worked with Marion Wright Edelman on issues vital to child health and welfare.

bush: drank

Clinton: lawyer with Congressional Committee during Watergate.

bush: drank. Arbusto.

Clinton: successful attny.

bush: one failure after another. bailouts from friends and family

Etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. And?
Is that supposed to mean it's not just as nepotistic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I wonder if Junior considers it "cheating"...
That Poppy spends so much time with Bill...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. If Jr had been by Poppy's side from the start, as his chief peer and advisor, you might have had a
point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. That's intergenerational within a family
An ancient paradigm, ambitious fathers enabling their sons is as old as Herod. But ambitious men enabling their ambitious wives? Very rare.

how many examples can you think of of wildly successful, powerful men who literally could have anything they wanted stepping back to help their wives achieve the same? To not only equal them, but perhaps supercede them? sure, people do that for their sons, but how many do it for their wives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. yes, because clearly husband wife relationship have the same paradigm as parent child
relationship
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Clearly there's no meaningful difference...
when it comes to nepotism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Well, in your mind that's clearly so.
Not that you've presented a case for your "clear" assertion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Nor have you presented a case why it's not old fashioned nepotism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Actually, I did.
It's in the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I meant a good one.
Your argument is that she's running a successful campaing, and therefore it's not nepotism.

Seems to me Bush won the Republican nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. You don't know what the word means
and that was not my only point.

I gather you think New Yorkers are stupid gits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Sure I do.
It's derived from an eastern european word meaning "nephew."

Comes from the practice of medieval Popes giving relatives positions of power in the catholic church, often the nephews or whoever would wind up Popes themselves.

More recently, it's part of systemic institutionalized racism and classism. It ensures people with good jobs and good education will keep it in the family, keeping the have-nots down.

In some cases it's illegal, and IMO, always immoral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Were those nephews ELECTED pope?
Hillary was elected. Twice

You may want to look up nepotism in the dictionary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. the original question asked was what would hrc be w.out bill
its assumes that bill lead always and hillary followed.

hillary had several independent career successes before bill was successful in his political career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. You mean would she be the front runner
In the democratic nomination race for president if she hadn't married Bill? Probably not. But the he probably wouldn't have been President if he had married someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. thats sybiosis, no? but the truth is we dont know.
we dont know how she would have done without bill or he without her. they are both very successful together and may have been successful apart.

she certainly had the ability, motivation and the beginning of a great career w.out him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Without a doubt
Both would be successful to some extent. But not THIS successful. Bill would have topped out as governor of arkansas, without Hillary, his inability to keep his dick in his pants sinks him. And without him, she's not a front runner for president in 2008 sexist America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. You just can't know how things will break
There are probably 10,000 people born the same year as Hillary in the US with the same talent, drive and determination, who knows what choices elevate the few to that level of opportunity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. It's not nepotism
And neither was Junior. Nepotism is getting something from someone in power based on your relationship with them. Nepotism is appointing your daughter to your vacant senate seat *cough cough* frank murkowski...*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. bush jr's presidency is not nepotism. agreed completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. Well, That i Buy!
Indeed. As with most succesful relationships, there is a mutual need and mutual satisfaction of those needs.

Good call.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. Great point Cali.
There are more than a few who believe Bill is/was actually a drag on Hillary's potential! She grew up with her own powerful connections in Chicago, Illinois - not a city/state for political novices.

And she is so smart. It's strange to me how people don't recognize how powerful she is all on her own. Frankly, it's interesting to ponder who she would have become without Bill - yes, a moot question but interesting to ponder nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC