Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF: MSNBC Online Poll: Gore 54% - Hillary 9.6% (166, 699) votes....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:18 PM
Original message
WTF: MSNBC Online Poll: Gore 54% - Hillary 9.6% (166, 699) votes....
Edited on Tue Oct-16-07 04:21 PM by Junkdrawer
On Edit: Link to MSNBC Poll:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21264312

And yet every "credible" "scientific" poll has it Hillary 40%, Gore 15% or something like that.

Now, there was a sister question to the MSNBC poll:

Should Al Gore run? 59% Yes, 37% No.

That's close to the "scientific" polls:
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hDeUWlQBWVo-FfWVbMcLi-fldCxQD8SADGI82

Why the big differences in the selection polls? And if the answer is that online polls select for those who read political articles, doesn't that say that there's a lot of confusion/name recognition in the "scientific" polls?

Again,

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. For once, my "WTF" has a smiley face on it ...
GREAT news for President Gore!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because it is not random sample selection.
The poll isn't selecting the sample, the sampelis selecting itself. Add to it that this poll may have been reported with voting encouraged by certain websites and you have a fairly useless poll.

It also doesn't account for race/age/income/etc as most polls do to properly weight them, extrapolating results from a sample of say a 1000 to reflect public opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Right. If online polls meant half a rat's shit,
Ron Paul would be the next President of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. True n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Yeah, but if Hillary voters actually outnumber Gore voters 3 to 1...
Edited on Tue Oct-16-07 04:38 PM by Junkdrawer
Wouldn't you expect different results than 54 to 9.6, even on an online poll - especially with 160,000+ votes. I mean if it was a dead heat online, then yeah...but this is better that 5 to 1 against Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Which should tell be a huge signal that the poll is worthless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's a huge disparity between "Should he run?" and "Will he win?"
Probably because way more people are voting in the latter polls, and the former is weighed down by the people who (like us) will drop everything in to give Al his props.

I think lots of people think he should run, but very few think he actually will.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think if he runs, he wins.
The question is, will he run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow. So I guess it's not just DU that "isn't indicative" of "real Democrats"
Edited on Tue Oct-16-07 04:25 PM by impeachdubya
it's this poll, too. :eyes:

I keep saying- IF Gore Gets in he will instantly be a serious fucking contender. But he's running out of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Online polls are self-selected, for people who
have an interest in reading MSNBC's political articles on the Internet, and who like to vote in online polls.

Actual polls are statistically valid. Online polls are, as the psychic-phone-lines say, "for amusement purposes only."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerLaw2010 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Because you can bot spam Internet polls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well, that's why the DU/Freep This Poll!!! exhortation is kinda meaningless.
I do think that a lot of people like the idea of Gore running, hell, I'm one of them.

But the online polls include children who cannot yet vote, young adults who have opinions but don't get their asses to the polls, people from the opposing team who vote for snark, and even foreigners who can't vote at all. And it excludes the reliable voters, like the elderly and those who are wage slaves, who don't spend all day online.

The scientific polls get names from voting lists, figure out who is a likely voter, and take it from there. They dump a shit load of the fluff ...

Of course, ya never know. Some polls are 'pushed' as well, particularly when a candidate is paying for them. The pollster, in that case, is Rosy Scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. MSNBC like CNN sold the American people on non-exixting WMD's to invade Iraq
M$M has liitle credibility these days when one simply recalls the roll they play when it's time to get to war mode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. Why Hillary supporters don't show up online
They don't "need" to. Simple as that. You'd likely find exactly the same results with any of the declared candidates. Why in the world would Hillary or Obama, Edwards, etc. supporters spend their time taking polls exhorting those candidates to enter a race they are already in?
Another thing that makes self-selected polls so useless is fervor. Sure, it's very handy during a campaign and can help swing some undecideds, but really, if you can get 51% to "accept voting for you" and the other person can only get 49%, but each one of them is a true believer, the accepted candidate wins.
Face it, Hillary has very broad support, but I don't see tons of rabid Hillary supporters. Maybe that indicates shallow support, maybe it just means she appeals especially well to those who don't get as riled up about politics (at least this early) as we at DU do. Either way, rarely will a front runner do well in a self-selected internet poll--their supporters don't need/want to change things as much as the supporters for the fringe or unannounced candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. So if you frame your "qualifying questions" so that only little old ladies from Peoria...
are "likely voters" then it's Hillary in a landslide...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. That's a fairly good representation of the most common primary voter.
Shallow, uninterested, scarcely pays attention, often votes on personalities and other nonissues, and shows up more out of a sense of duty than because they want to push for Real Societal Change. These people like Hillary Clinton. These people are likely voters.

Hillary is winning in a landslide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. My experience with one of the polling organizatins a couple months ago
might be part of the answer

List of candidates read, who will you for?

Edwards

Clinton you mean Clinton

No EDWARDS....

Might have been an aberration... but that to me spoke volumes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Remember who? Gallop? CNN? Zogby?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. It was one of the local ones
but I turned to my husband and went WTF? After the call was over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Probably an incompetent worker letting his mind go a bit.
Edited on Tue Oct-16-07 05:44 PM by Rhythm and Blue
Used to hearing "Clinton" there (maybe got four HRC hits in a row), by habit put a tally in the "Clinton" field, then caught himself and tried to stammer out: "You said Clinton there, right?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solar_Power Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. Gore has my vote
Run Al!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC