Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tony Blair's new job: Beating the drumbeat for war with Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 09:52 PM
Original message
Tony Blair's new job: Beating the drumbeat for war with Iran
Once a poodle, always a poodle.


from the Guardian UK:


Jaw-jawing to war-war
Tony Blair's incontinent rhetoric in New York, comparing militant Islamism with 1920s fascism, only takes us closer to the abyss of war with Iran.
David Cox


Tony Blair has seen fit to tell an American audience including Rupert Murdoch and New York mayor Michael Bloomberg that the "deadly ideology" behind extremist Islam poses a threat to the world comparable to that posed by fascism in the 1930s. Perhaps he found the three standing ovations he received a gratifying reminder of the days when America lauded him for lending global cover to George W Bush's once popular military adventurism. The rest of us, however, should shudder.

Blair went on to assure his listeners that the ideology he finds so awesome is "a perversion of the proper faith of Islam". He added that it "now has a state, Iran, that is prepared to back and finance terror in the pursuit of destabilising countries whose people wish to live in peace". His remarks came shortly after George Bush had suggested that failure to prevent Iran from acquiring the know-how to make nuclear weapons could precipitate a third world war. They were delivered as not just Bush, but some of his potential successors as well, are eagerly preparing the ground for military action against Tehran.

Rather than lending his weight to this war fervour, what might a supposed Middle East peace envoy more usefully have said?

Blair could have pointed out that a complex country like Iran with not much to gain from war has little in common with a heavily militarised fascist state intent on annexing the territory of its neighbours. He might have suggested that one of the few things capable of uniting Iran's disparate peoples behind militarism would be an attack by western forces.

It might have been helpful to put the threat posed by Islamist terrorism in a rational context. On 9/11, 2,752 people died. On 7/7, 52 people were killed. On Britain's roads, more people die in an average year than in both of these incidents put together. Tragic though the effects of terrorism are for its victims, the truth is that they amount to no more than a pinprick on the life of the western world. Their significance lies entirely in the publicity that their perpetrators seek, at which we connive by providing, and in their ability to prompt reckless over-reaction by our politicians.

Islamist terrorism seems set to continue, whatever we do. Western politicians who claim to understand Islamic theology better than the faith's own scholars seem likely only to encourage jihadist recruitment. Iran may well acquire nuclear weapons, as Pakistan, arguably a rather more dangerous place, has already done. The task of our politicians now is to work out how to live with these realities, not to whip up futile bellicosity. Tony Blair's contribution has taken us one step further towards what might really prove to be a third world war. .....(more)

The complete piece is at: http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/david_cox/2007/10/jawjawing_to_warwar.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yet another Nazi comparison that is over-generalized, disingenuous, and useless
Edited on Fri Oct-19-07 09:54 PM by jpgray
Maybe this time more DUers will agree with me. :P I fucking -hate- it when people try to beat their audience over the head with lazy, inattentive historical analogies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. he's seen how much $$$ the other assholes are raking in on speaking tours
so he's hopped on board the douchebag express.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. What The Hell? We're not
through with toady blur's bleating for war? WTF! Is he on carlyle's payroll now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gawd, I can't stand the sight of cyclops again.
Can't he just go away and STFU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. DUers Prescient again!
We predicted that Blair would do this!

Holy frappuccino! He wasted so little time to go all Margette Thatcher on Iran's hiney. The PM in Canada, the ex-prime in B.I. and the soon-to-be-ex in the WH are all super-psycho Hawks for a reason that can only be seen as defending failed policies of world-wide domination, adventurism and Corporatization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hey, if you want to "earn" your seat among the bigs in the Carlyle
Group, ya gotta do what ya gotta do which is exactly what Blair is doing, selling his soul (such as it might be) to the "company store".

He is a POS, always was, sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC