Drum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 02:05 PM
Original message |
Speech-to-text software...does anyone have any experience or insight on this? |
|
Where do things stand now in the evolution of this? I have a very large amount of handwritten text that I want to convert typed-text in my computer (for editing) and the task of transcribing it all manually seems completely overwhelming. Scanning hundreds of pages and applying a text-recognition program is also totally impractical for me.
So it got me wondering...whether reading the pages into a mic and having the computer do the work might be an option. I know that there are always issues with pronunciation and one's own voice, things must be tweaked or corrected, but perhaps a V-to-T program could do the lion's share of this transcription process....
So what say you, diverse and experienced peeps? Does anyone know about this stuff? Is there a natural choice of program for this sort of thing...any recommendations? Naturally a freeware/beta/shareware would be nice, but if there's also a really dependable solution then the project is important enough to me to justify buying the software.
Any comments or suggestions?
(Will also cross-post this query in other DU fora and groups.)
Thanks for any and all assistance
|
shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Scanning handwritten and trying to ocr |
|
the results won't work. Ocr only recognizes typed text.
|
cuke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Speech to text is probably your best bet |
|
but you need to practice and there will still be many errors, which can be corrected using your voice once you learn the voice commands.
|
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 02:12 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The software exists, but be prepared to do |
|
a tremendous amount of editing. The software isn't capable of discerning context and the results are often hilarious.
|
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Here's my story about Dragon Naturally Speaking |
|
I went through the whole training thing so it would recognize my voice and then tried to practice by writing a "memo" to my friend Trish, whom we call "Dish."
I started out "Hey, Dish!" and Dragon typed.... wait for it...
hashish.
|
alfredo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message |
4. You on a Mac or PC? Solutions for both platforms. |
|
On the Mac there is iListen. http://www.macspeech.com/On the PC I think it is Dragon Naturally Speaking http://www.digitalriver.com/v2.0-img/operations/scansoft/site/367062/367062_dns-talk.htmlIt takes training the application and then if you get 95% accuracy, you are doing good.
|
Drum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Thanks alfredo!
I had heard of Dragon some years ago, and it didn't work on the lame computer I had at the time. They are on my radar as one to investigate, but I'd be a fool if I didn't tap the vast experience of DUers to see how things had progressed in the last 5-10 years.
Thanks for the tip! :hi:
|
alfredo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
15. No problem. If my arms get worse and typing becomes difficult, I |
|
might have to go that way.
|
Fredda Weinberg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. It's training yourself to speak clearly. The software can be 100% accurate |
|
if you know what you're doing.
|
alfredo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
16. I get a sore throat after a couple minutes. |
Fredda Weinberg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
8. You have the perfect voice for recognition |
Drum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
jmatthan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Stay away from ViaVoice |
|
This product was launched by IBM and their support was absolutely LOUSY.
I do not whether it is still an IBM Product but when it was they did not care a damn about problems faced by the User.
|
Drum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. will do...thanks for the caution! nt |
rzemanfl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I tried voice-to-text in the mid '90s at work. I remember it |
|
Edited on Sat Oct-27-07 03:22 PM by rzemanfl
required 32 megs of RAM, which at the time was 750 bucks. To use it I had to switch to 16 colors on the monitor. Then I got pissed off about the job, quit and moved to Florida. I can't remember the name of the software, but I think it had "dragon" in the name.
On edit, I should have read post 3. I believe my version was called "Dragon Dictate." It was actually kind of cool, but I think most people just learned to use the keyboard, I know I did.
|
The Straight Story
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Just hire an illegal to type it all in |
Hekate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |
14. I took a course on Dragon Naturally Speaking and got pretty good at it |
|
Mr. H gets worried about my CTS, so he sent me. However, we ended up not buying the program for ourselves.
Here's what I found out: You do have to "train" the program to recognize your vocal peculiarities, and give it a little refresher every time. Maybe the refresher was because we were in a lab with multiple users, though. It ended up performing reasonably well for me. However --
However, I revise and edit continually while I am composing the text, and again when I'm done. And then again before I print or send. Working like this slows me down quite a bit.
Oh, I almost forgot. There's the privacy issue. For me, writing is a private act. I don't share until and unless I want to. Speaking aloud like that....
If my CTS ever progresses to the point where I can't use a keyboard, I will certainly revisit this software.
Hekate
|
Drum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-27-07 10:10 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:21 AM
Response to Original message |