Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Helen Thomas: Veto power makes lame duck relevant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:21 AM
Original message
Helen Thomas: Veto power makes lame duck relevant
Veto power makes lame duck relevant

By HELEN THOMAS
HEARST NEWSPAPERS

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The dying months of the disastrous Bush presidency are beginning to resemble the twilight of the Clinton administration.

Both presidents have had to plaintively proclaim they were still "relevant" even as their epitaphs were being written.

Both presidents belatedly looked for a solution to the perennial Israeli-Palestinian problem to put a feather in their foreign-policy caps.

On that score, President Clinton struck out big time and petulantly put all the blame on the late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. Clinton supported a plan by former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak for Palestinian enclaves to be surrounded by Israeli checkpoints, making a mockery of Palestinian sovereignty. It would have been perilous for any Palestinian leader to accept that plan.

The failure of the peace talks was a blow for Clinton, who gambled on a last bid to add a Middle East triumph to his fading presidency.

President Bush is in the same boat.

Bush repeatedly brags that he is the first president to endorse a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian stalemate.

But he has done nothing except give it lip service and has been so pro-Israeli that the U.S. cannot act as an "honest broker" between the two. Meanwhile, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is frantically trying to pull together a Middle East peace conference in November.

more...

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/337037_thomas28.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Same old shit, another self-serving politician
<snip>

Clinton -- who had to deal with a Republican Congress -- told reporters "the Constitution gives me relevance." He also played up his veto power to bolster his importance.

When a reporter suggested recently that Bush has become "increasingly irrelevant," Bush replied:

"On the contrary, I've never felt more engaged and more capable of helping people to recognize ... that there's a lot of unfinished business. And I'm really looking forward to the next 15 months. I'm looking forward to getting some things done for the American people."

He also noted that he still has veto power to block any legislation he doesn't like.

"This is one way to ensure that I am relevant," he said. "That's one way to ensure I'm in the process. And I intend to use the veto."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. bush "still has veto power to block any legislation he doesn't like" - So do dems, in fact
The bush killing & torture spree could be stopped today if the democrats truly wanted to do so. Bush's "veto power" is just another side to the "we need 60 votes" lie.

Any senator can put a "hold" on a bill and stop it.

Forty democratic senators can filibuster a bill and stop it.

The house's majority democrats can simply refuse to bring a bill forward for a vote and stop it.

Yet here we are, in the same place we would have been even if the republicans had widened their majority in congress in the 2006 election. They're the minority now, yet bush gets everything he wants and more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC