Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thousands of Dead Fish Pulled from Lake Davis (16,000 gallons of toxin poured in by state)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 01:38 PM
Original message
Thousands of Dead Fish Pulled from Lake Davis (16,000 gallons of toxin poured in by state)
Thousands of Dead Fish Pulled from Lake Davis

PORTOLA (AP) -- California officials have completed the grim task of collecting fish killed in last month's poisoning of a Sierra Nevada lake to exterminate the northern pike.

California Department of Fish and Game crews gathered nearly 50,000 pounds of fish since September 21st, when 16,000 gallons of a toxic chemical were poured into Lake Davis near Portola.

Northern pike, which wildlife experts believe were carried to Lake Davis by anglers from outside the state in the 1980s, decimated the lake's famous trophy trout.

California first poisoned Lake Davis in 1997 but pike reappeared 18 months later.

http://www.news10.net/display_story.aspx?storyid=34420
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. WTF? Does anyone besides me think this is crazy? Too bad about the
'prize' trout, I'm sorry. But to poison the lake?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I thought I was the only one-- how on earth is poisoning the lake going to help the trout? or any
of the other aquatic denizens? do people swim in this lake?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. LOTS of folks protested this the first time we went through it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. As a fisheries biologist I have used Rotenone before
It is not a toxic chemical that can harm humans by absorption in the skin. It only affects the gill functions of fish to smother them and is used regularly by state fish & game departments to rid lakes and ponds of undesirable fish species.

The northern pike is a voracious predator that upsets the natural biodiversity of water bodies they are introduced. Once it dissipates the lake/pond can be restocked with native species.

It is too bad that it has to be done, but idiot sport fishermen not knowing what they are doing to the local ecology bring this burden to the state biologists that have to remedy the problem with rotenone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. thank you for that information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You are correct.of course. Thanks. Esp. about rotenone not being . .
Edited on Sun Oct-28-07 02:32 PM by msmcghee
. . a toxin in the usual sense. As one would expect from a fisheries professional. It has no effect on humans, or any animals that don't have gills. Also, Northern Pike are not indigenous west of the Rocky Mountains / continental divide. On this side of the divide aquatic ecosystems have evolved since the last ice age around trout / salmon / char species.

Idiots from the mid-west prairie states keep planting species like Northern Pike and Walleye Pike in our waters where they are totally unmatched to the existing food base, aquatic insects, crustaceans, etc. The only way to restore the balance is to kill all the fish in the lake and then try to restore things by planting native species. Like most man-made problems - real solutions are difficult and complicated and will not be resolved by reacting to emotional catch phrases like "poisoning the poor fish".

Brown trout that have been planted here though are also not native to this region. Cutthroat, rainbow, bull trout are. Large mouth bass is another widely planted non-native species. I heard they were brought out in buckets from the east during the railroad expansion by crews who would toss them into ponds along railroad right-of-way - so they could fish for their dinner in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Striped bass were also shipped from the east coast
and transplanted into the San Francisco Bay and Sacramento River drainages as a food fish source in the 1800's when, as you say, railroads stretched to the west coast.

You're spot on about brown trout. They are very aggressive and will out-compete rainbow trout and brook trout for food. The rainbows will become especially stunted in growth if brown trout are in the system.

I was surprised to see Northern Pike in the tundra ponds of southwest Alaska (Lake Iliamna) region a few years back. They have out-competed Dolly Varden and other salmonid species in many of Alaska's interior watersheds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Factsheet: Rotenone
Rotenone
A recent study linking rotenone – a pesticide with a ‘natural’ image, commonly used in organic farming and gardening – to Parkinson’s disease, has increased demand for a level playing field in the safety assessment of pesticides. The current regulatory system, designed for synthetic agrochemicals, impedes research into, and registration of, least toxic, relatively benign pest control substances.

<snip>

Acute toxicity
Rotenone is classified by the World Health Organisation as a moderately hazardous, Class II(18). The LD50 for rats (the amount of the chemical lethal to one-half of experimental animals) is between 132 and 1,500 mg per kilogram(19). One factor in this wide variation may be the differences in the plant extracts used(20).
The acute oral toxicity of rotenone is moderate for mammals, but there is a wide variation between species(21). It is less toxic for the mouse and hamster than for the rat; the pig seems to be especially sensitive. Recent studies have shown that in rats, rotenone is more toxic for females than males. It is highly irritating to the skin in rabbits(22), and to the eyes. In rats and dogs exposed to rotenone in dust form, the inhalation fatal dose was uniformly smaller than the oral fatal dose(23).
Rotenone is believed to be moderately toxic to humans with an oral lethal dose estimated from 300 to 500 mg/kg(24). A lowest lethal dose of 143 mg/kg has been cited in a child(25). Clinical experience seems to indicate that children, in particular, are rather sensitive to the acute effects of rotenone(26).
Human fatalities are rare, perhaps because rotenone is usually sold in low concentrations (one to five per cent formulation), and because its irritating action causes prompt vomiting. If the dust particle size is very small, and can enter deep regions of the lungs, rotenone’s toxicity when inhaled may be increased. Acute local effects include conjunctivitis, dermatitis, sore throat, congestion, and vomiting. Inhalation of high doses can cause increased respiration followed by depression and convulsions(27). On the basis of rabbit studies, absorption through the intact skin is low(28).

http://www.pan-uk.org/pestnews/Actives/rotenone.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC