Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Most of these bastards molest girls under age 12": Anti-Immigrations Dark Underbelly of Racism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 05:32 PM
Original message
"Most of these bastards molest girls under age 12": Anti-Immigrations Dark Underbelly of Racism
Edited on Sat Nov-24-07 05:42 PM by McCamy Taylor
Paul Krugman recently wrote a column in which he gently brought up the idea that the anti-immigration debate is being framed as a racial issue by the Republican Party.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/19/opinion/19krugman.html?_r=2&n=Top/Opinion/Editorials%20and%20Op-Ed/Op-Ed/Columnists/Paul%20Krugman&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

"Can anti-immigrant rhetoric replace old-fashioned racial politics? No, because it mobilizes the same shrinking pool of whites — and alienates the growing number of Latino voters," he writes.


This, in the context of an article in which he describes how most of the country has become decidedly adverse to racism, at least of an overt nature. Racism of the kind that Reagan and Bush Sr. used so successfully in their campaigns.


Unfortunately, the Republican Party is like staphylococcus. It can mutate in order to stay lethal and infective. Unlike Karl Rove, it can learn new tricks. And it is not above being two faced if that will help it stay in power.

An article in the Sacremento Bee describes how the owner of a preschool, where kids can learn yoga and a second language, such as French or Spanish, received irate phone calls from people who accused her of encouraging illegal immigration. The French was fine. The Spanish was not.

http://www.star-telegram.com/national_news/story/319710.html

Just plain silly, right? I mention this to show that the Republicans have managed to package their anti-immigration racism in a sleek, non offensive wrapper designed to appeal to voters in non Southern states.

(A) neighbor struck up a conversation with her to blame Mexicans, Dupre said, for everything wrong -- including grocery prices.


Wait until she sees the grocery prices when the food is rotting in the fields and on the trees, because there is no one to harvest it!

For many outside the White South, where (for many) racism is still socially acceptable, anti-immigration is perceived as an economic and security issue. There is a reason for this. A study from the Anti-Defamation League entitled Immigrants Targeted: Extremist Rhetoric Moves Into the Mainstream shows how the anti-immigration political movement, spearheaded by Republicans like Bill Frist, speaks with two heads. At home, in places like Georgia, it pairs up with NeoNazis, White Supremists, members of the KKK and eugenics advocates to deliver the kind of racist rhetoric that is so useful in getting Southern Whites to vote against their own economic self interest and for the economic interests of the rich and powerful---in this case represented by the Republican Party.

http://www.adl.org/civil_rights/anti_immigrant/da_king.asp

This is a great document. Very in depth. I recommend that everyone read it.

Some examples (people who are convinced that the anti-immigration movement is not being framed as an anti-Latino or hate movement, please pay close attention):

Speaking at a Newton County (Georgia) Republican Party meeting in April 2007, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, King reportedly told attendees that undocumented immigrants are "not here to mow your lawn – they’re here to blow up your buildings and kill your children, and you, and me."


Dallacroce echoes the anti-immigrant themes of a "mass invasion" of unintelligent, disrespectful, conspiratorial criminals while targeting her message to women and families. She focuses on immigration as a threat to American children and denigrates the values of immigrant families, branding immigrant children as "dumb" and violent.

snip

"Our beautiful Nation has been turned into a jungle by the mass invasion of illegal aliens"

snip

"My children, as well as my grandchildren and everyone’s legal citizen children in our schools, are being affected, dumbed down."


Grass Fire’s 57-page pamphlet, "The Truth About the Illegal Invasion" tries to instill fear in readers with its claims that "illegal immigration is creating a crisis of lawlessness and has led to a massive underground criminal element that feeds off human trafficking and drug running. Illegal immigration is inundating our borders with mountains of garbage. And illegal immigration is undermining American culture and threatening our future."


There is of discussion of the inflated claims about the disease the immigrants are bringing into the country, including Lou Dobbs' insanity about leprosy (which happens to be endemic to Texas, silly rabbit! so no one has to import it).

The worst of the medical claims (and the one from which I take the title of this journal entry) can be found on the last page of the ADL document in the YouTube video clip in which a so called expert describes (in chillingly B Grade movie Nazi villain-esque tones) how Latino immigrants are destined to be pedophiles and child rapists because they were brought up in poverty (ouch!).

"Most of these bastards molest girls under age 12".."or some specialize in boys. Or nuns."


Hmmm. Wonder if her audience realizes that lots of people in Appalachia were brought up in poverty and also share a mixture of White and Native American ancestry, just like Mexicans.

For those from the South, this is all too familiar. The standard Fear the Black Man mantra begins and ends with "He is an oversexed animal who is after our White Women." For those of you who do not understand how the wealthy classes in the South keep working class Whites afraid of Blacks and other minorities by claiming that they pose a threat to the honor of White women, read W. J. Cash's The Mind of the South.

This is chilling stuff, but most Americans outside the South have never read or heard any of this, for a very good reason. The corporate media does not show you the Southern Fried face of the anti-immigration movement. Just as George Allen's "macaca" comment was supposed to be for local consumption only, the "stupid", "sex crazed", "criminal" adjectives are intended for a White racist Southern voting audience which, as Krugman writes, is dwindling in size, but which is still very powerful in a number of states like Georgia and Tennessee ("Harold, Call Me") Alabama and the like.

The rest of the country would react negatively to this kind of racially biased political talk, just as the rest of the country was terribly unamused by "macaca". So, the corporate media sanitizes the anti-immigration debate. From the ADL document:

Despite King’s numerous other inflammatory statements, the national media and elected officials have provided King with a mainstream platform. He has toned down his rhetoric in mainstream television and print media and his statements and articles now reach millions of Americans. In May 2007, Anderson Cooper interviewed King on CNN Today, introducing him as a "columnist" and "activist." Twelve mainstream newspapers have printed King’s articles, most notably The Washington Times, which neutrally describes the Dustin Inman Society as "a Georgia-based coalition of citizens with the goal of educating the public on the consequences of illegal immigration." King’s pieces, mostly discussing immigration, are also featured regularly in Georgia in The Marietta Daily Journal.


The Republican Party stands to gain from the anti-immigration movement. As I posted yesterday, the Department of Homeland Security has announced that the 1.4 million applications for citizenship which it received between Sept. 2006 and 2007 will not be processed in the usual 7-8 months. Instead, they will be processed in 15-18 months, preventing a million or more new Latino (Democratic) voters from participating in the elections next fall in Florida, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, where they might possibly turn the tide of close races. If Latinos were not being vilified in the press, they would never get away with it this. However, there is a good chance that Democrats in Congress will be afraid to stand up for these almost citizens' rights, for fear of angering voters who have gotten a whiff of the anti-immigrant Kool Aid and are scared but do not know that what has frightened them is old fashioned racist propaganda. Here is more on the voter suppression scandal

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/11/22/182533/10

Setting up any group as a criminal element to be feared helps a law and order candidate like Rudy, since he will vow to crack down on crime. Blaming Hispanics for the high price of food (???) takes the heat off the Bush administration and the Republicans for things like the high cost of oil, trade policies, the high deficit, the mortgage crisis and other factors that have contributed to the sour economy. And, in the South, having a racial group to fear and hate, brings Whites together under the banner of the party that says "We are for Whites only". If you are an undereducated, underpaid nonunion worker who is dissatisfied with his life, the temptation to vote for a party that says "It isn't your fault. It is the ____s fault. Stick with us, and we will make something again" sure can be tough to resist, especially when your parents and grandparents and great grandparents all fell for the same slick line.

In the long run, keeping the low skilled working class oppressed is good for business owners, because they are assured cheap labor. For years, they kept African-Americans out of schools so that they could pay them dirt wages for manual labor. The Civil Rights movement changed some of that. Now Black women make about the same wages that White women do. Blacks receive educations and most important of all, they can get government jobs with job security and union safeguards. This has left a void in the workplace which Hispanic immigrants are filling. However, Mexicans more than people born in the U.S.---Whites and Blacks---tend to join unions, protest unfair treatment, vote for their economic benefit, stay abreast of politics. That means that they will quickly stop being a source of cheap low skilled labor---unless something is done to keep them oppressed, marginalized, living in fear, just as Blacks have lived in fear for so many years. Worse yet, as they become a larger part of the population, they may encourage other ethnic members of the working class to stand up for their own rights. Imagine the U.S. with the kind of vocal, fearless working class they have in Mexico, combined with the wealth we have now. We could become like one of the civilized countries of western Europe, where people have health care, fair elections, maternity leave and the rich pay taxes.

Immigrants have always added to the richness of this country. We learn something from every wave. In part, that is because it is often the most enterprising and industrious who come here to better themselves. I strongly suspect that the nation's employers do not want the working class to improve itself with what Latino immigrants can teach us.

At this moment, immigration is the only issue the GOP has going into the 2008 election, and they are playing it for all it is worth. The Republicans do not care if their racist talk results in violence towards Hispanics ( some of whom are citizens) and for this they deserve to be sentenced to repeat High School so that they can learn what it means to be a good citizen in a democracy (Hint: it does not mean treating other human beings as expendable). The recent report on Hate Crimes in the U.S., which admits to under counting hates crimes, mentions that 63% of crimes involving ethnicity are committed against Latinos. In a climate in which there is no mandatory reporting of hate crimes, and southern states do not report hate crimes and alien victims may fear retaliation, it is likely that the FBI statistics are not accurate. A better picture of the virulence of hatred towards Latinos can probably be gained from this report from the Southern Poverty Law Center which describes actual acts of violence and calls for violence.

http://www.splcenter.org/news/item.jsp?aid=186

The list includes

Lawless' suggestions included: "Steal the money from any illegal walking into a bank or check cashing place," "Make every illegal alien feel the heat of being a person without status...I hear the rednecks in the South are beating up illegals as the textile mills have closed. Use your imagination," and "Discourage Spanish-speaking children from going to school. Be creative."


On March 27, New Jersey-based neo-Nazi radio host Hal Turner called for the mass murder of Hispanics and the assassination of U.S. senators who support guest worker programs. "All of you who think there's a peaceful solution to these invaders are wrong. We're going to have to start killing these people," Turner said.


So, tell me. Who exactly are the terrorists here?

In this kind of climate, Latinos are much more likely to be the victims than the instigators. However, we see the press doing what it has done to Blacks for years. Every time there is a crime with an Hispanic suspect and victims of another race, it becomes a media circus. Immigration status is the first thing reported. Something like a car accident not involving alcohol becomes a rallying cry for a Berlin Wall on the border.

This is not inevitable. For over a century, the nation's politicians, business leaders, press, scientists treated African-Americans this way, some out of prejudice, some out of habit, some because it was good politics or good business. It changed. Writers and civil rights leaders and right thinking citizens and brave politicians and the courts made it change.

The fact that the Civil Rights movement happened within our lifetime and the fact that most of America remembers "I have a dream" means that if we point our finger directly at the fundamental racism that lies at the dark heart of the anti-immigration movement in this country, the majority of Americans will turn their faces away, just as Paul Krugman says. Take away the sleek packaging that says "economic issue" and the pretty ribbon that says "security for my kids", and the nation's soccer moms and dads will find themselves repulsed by the cross burning and violence inciting talk that is going on in some parts of the country.

A good way to start would be with a PBS documentary. Please, Bill Moyer. Or maybe a book. Over 50 years ago, John Steinbeck opened the nation's eyes to the plight of another group of migrants, who were also "illegals" in that they were branded vagrants and undesirables by the state of California. I am talking about the book The Grapes of Wrath and the plight of the refugees from the Dust Bowl.

Okie use' ta mean you was from Oklahoma. Now it means you're a dirty son-of-a-bitch. Okie means you're scum. Don't mean nothing itself, it's the way they say it.


http://www.allgreatquotes.com/grapes_of_wrath_quotes.shtml

Immigrant used to mean you were from another country. Now it means you are a pedophile rapist, terrorist and carrier of disease. It doesn't mean anything in itself, it's the way they say it.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT does not equate to Immigrant...both sides of this...
..a flaming fucking assholes with absolutely no grasp of the issue and are ABSOLUTELY doing no good fro either the legal immigrant or the illegal immigrant. In fact the as far as the election goes every screaming bawling, tantrum throwing name-calling 'defender' of the poor saintly illegal immigrant is doing nothing more than causing a backlash vote, which will translate into draconian laws and rules which will bring down even more misery upon the heads of the illegal migrant. But the touvhy-feely actually WANTS this result, because then it will trigger even greater quantities of endorphins and they will get even greater highs screaming, stamping, bawling and snitting on the illegal immigrants behalf.

...that's the truth that people do not want to face up to. The truth that the loudest bewailers really deep down do not want a solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Um...we want immigration reform. Here is a good Kos Diary
Edited on Sat Nov-24-07 06:04 PM by McCamy Taylor
on the topic, which is a whole different topic.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/11/23/172826/75

For those who do not want to read the whole thread at Kos which was called 147 and written by someone else, the punchline was that in one year there were only 147 work permits for people who were unskilled workers not actually living in the country already, related to someone living in the country already and not skilled workers (you know, doctors, scientists ect.)

This, despite the fact that industry and agriculture continues to grow and to create unskilled low wage jobs that no one in the U.S of any race wants, because we are all overqualified and would not be caught dead picking lettuce.

This means that the workers, who need the jobs and the employers, who need the workers, just take care of things informally.

This all needs to be fixed, so that the workers have protection and so that the employers can not exploit them with low wages and benefits, driving down overall salaries in the U.S. It would be a thousand times easier to correct the computer and other problems in DC to get a working system in place to get a guest worker program going, than it is going to be to build a Berlin Wall between us and Mexico,

However, making a guest worker program is bad for business.

1. Because no company gets to make billions making the stupid wall

2. Employers dont get to continue to exploit immigrant laborers, particularly rounding them up when they try to unionize

3. The Republicans can not use immigration as their new divide and conquer political issue against the Democrats and to mobilize their own base.

But anyway, it is illegal because the government and the big business that owns our government wants it to be, not because the immigrants want to be here illegally. Keep that in mind. It is illegal for the same reason that Bush's domestic wiretapping is illegal.

We should be on the same side as the immigrants. If the RNC separates us, then Divide and Conquer will have worked again and we are nothing but political fools, worthy of the scorn that most of the world has for us as politically naive people who are lead around by the nose by our corporate masters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. yes, it is. and it differs little from what I am saying, different tack is all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. One illegality precedes the migration illegality. Businesses wanted
these workers - they hired illegally creating illegality and those in government who are supposed to make things flow legally. or not allow it, have allowed this monster because there was enough to go around - at one time.

Can it be that the combination of allowing illegality - for profit - begets close minded bigotry - while those who profit keep their mouths shut. Don't ask, don't tell.

It seems to be all about profit, but in the case of work - it's farmers and small businesses in addition to corporations.

No bigots talk about the primary illegality. Their brains can't understand the business part of it or to understand that that their political party let it fester. Or that their political party is now using it to create hate for votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. We already have draconian immigration laws
They need to be changed. Currently they discriminate against Hispanics. Hence, there are very few LEGAL immigrants coming across our southern border.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. you have no idea how much MORE draconian they can become n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. ...
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. The legal/illegal issue is meaningless
People who use it are only doing so strategically. Question them further, and you find they are against legal immigrants too.

We have many illegal immigrants because we have laws that prevent people who want to come and work from coming but allow in long lost relatives of people who have been here for many years. They are dysfunctional and need to be amended. The brother of a naturalized citizen can arrive legally at the age of 55 (what he'll probably be after the running of the quots) to live in any state, to be "reunited" with his US citizen brother, one can live in Montana and the other in Georgia. We take 65,000 such persons each year, legally.

But people who come to work in low paying jobs can't possibly come legally, yet they are young and willing to work in harder, lower paying jobs to work their way up.

We let the quotas applicable to employment based immigrants (proven to be needed by a long and complex Department of Labor procedure) fill up - we actually have limits on people proven to be needed in the economy - we'd rather damage economic growth than admit one foreigner over the quota level.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. yet you IMMEDIATELY use the term...go away and learn to reason like a human!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Huh?
I don't understand your response.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Do you have any clue whatsoever what you're talking about?
If your post reflects your knowledge of the subject you have no idea what you're talking about. Your bio says you live in Texas. Sounds like typical East Texas talking to me. Where? Orange? Jasper? Nacogdoches? Maybe even Corsicana? Absolutely typical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kicked and recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why do we keep seeing this
Edited on Sat Nov-24-07 06:30 PM by vpilot
kind of straw man bullshit repeated despite the fact its NOT TRUE.:
Wait until she sees the grocery prices when the food is rotting in the fields and on the trees, because there is no one to harvest it!
We have an H2-A visa program under which farmers can legally hire ALL the agricultural workers needed. If crops are rotting in the field its because the farmer either didn't hire enough workers or he doesn't want to pay the required prevailing wage. There is also this study by Philip Martin a professor of agricultural and resource economics at the University of California, Davis that suggests otherwise: http://www.cis.org/articles/2007/back907.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You answered your own question: "doesn't want to pay the required prevailing wage"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. There's a quota limit on those
Whether they are needed or not, the first one over the quota can't come legally.

It's as if there were a quota on the number of waitresses you could hire - say under such a law, your restaurant needs more, but when over the quota, you can't hire them - therefore, you can't take in new customers or expand the restaurant. Period. The quota trumps the market need.

And any jobs that would have been created from that expansion are out the window too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R #4 for, EXCELLENT o.p.!1
From the very beginning of the flare up of the immigration issue, "national security" has been used as a cover. After 9-11, "immigration" took over as a means of keeping the blood boiling. And the standard response has always been, "Why is it that as soon as the discussion is over the border(s?) somebody yells 'RACISM'?" Uh, because the hysteria is focused at the SOUTHERN border, past which ZERO (0) of the 9-11 terrorists crossed?! Could that be one reason?

Yes, the Neo-Nazis, Skinheads, and Silent types are right there in the Minutemen midst. Shooting ourselves in the foot: Putting up physical and psychological barriers to the health of our own economy.

Poster #1, who claims to make the distinction between "illegal" and "legal" immigrants, also objected to my thread regarding how, while there was a spate of threads saying holiday spending was flat, business was booming at the Southern border stores, fueled by VISITORS from Mexico (not "immigrants").

In New Orleans, undocumented immigrants were exploited outrageously, then turned away. First, they were worked and over-worked, but when payday came around they were turned in to INS.


I never have anything good to say about Shrub, but the closest is this: Like NIXON going to China, only a Rethug with a border background could have tamped down ---SOMEWHAT--- the anti-immigrant HYSTERIA. Partying at the border, probably having Mexican servants and employees in his failed businesses, having a Mexican sister-in-law, flying drug missions to Latin America--- facsimiles of these experiences gave him CONTACT and some sympathy for Hispanics. Just about any other Rethug as pResident during this time would have been stampeded by his TANCREDO and SENSENBRENNER and Minutemen followers.

It is too bad we couldn't ram through immigration reform with Shrub. The next Democratic president will be massacred for anything attempted, or, more likely, will be stampeded into something draconian in order to be perceived as "strong."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. "... a sleek, non offensive wrapper ...
designed to appeal to voters in non Southern states."



You imply that southern voters are racist and don't need the sleek wrapper!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Sad but true. I was born and raised here. The rest of the nation would
be horrified if they knew the kind of thing that Southern Whites say in private to each other, when they think that only the Sweetened Tea KoolAid sippers are listening.

Since Southerners move around, you can find them in other parts of the country, too, and some have lost their accents. But the mind set is harder to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. If the economy goes bad, I'll guarantee you we are headed for a pogrom.
First they came for the Latinos......

Scary shit.


My Favorite Master Artist: Karen Parker GhostWoman Studios
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. glad to recommend -- this was a great post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. racism is mainstream
when it comes to illegal immigrants. It amazed me that during a discussion of illegal immigration callers to CSPAN spewed out ugly, racist hate speech and were treated politely by the host. Similar speech about other minority groups would not have been tolerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. You can find European overstays, too
Yet their illegal status does not seem to be an enormous problem to these xenophobes.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Just a quick comment about history
I've read that anti-"Mexican" hysteria was used by Hearst back in the late 20s or early 30s to whip up racist sentiments. So your idea about this being a new phenomenon may be looking at one wave within another wave, if it's accurate.

Most of those things you've bolded are just psychological projections. They're used against anyone when it's convenient to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. All of us European-Americans ultimately are the real
Edited on Sat Nov-24-07 09:13 PM by Blue_In_AK
illegal immigrants. Seems to me this kind of "us and them" kind of thinking needs to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
22. The Rs decided in 68 to reach out to southern KKKers, who were traditionally anti-immigrant
in addition to being racist.

Forty years of R outreach to the lunatic fringe has had two effects: first, the R "mainstream" increasingly includes fringe program elements; and second, the fringe is emboldened by the R hate-mongering to step up recruitment efforts.

So not only are we seeing the KKK's traditional anti-immigrant platform echoed by R politicians, we are also seeing a renewed KKK membership drive around the same issue.



Description: The menace of modern immigration: an address outlining fully the policies of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan by H. W. Evans, 1924.
Credit: Michigan State University Library, Special Collections Division.
http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/thumbnail328.html

viaThe Subway Canaries http://subwaycanaries.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2006/10/14/2416836.html


Nixon's "Southern Strategy" and Forces Against Brown
Journal of Negro Education
Summer 2004
by Frank Brown

... This article describes the political activities in school desegregation after Brown by the two major political parties, republicans and democrats. In summary, the Republican Party placed its major activities toward winning southerners ' votes in order to change the majority in the U.S. Congress, slowing down the desegregation process, creating alternatives to public school desegregation (such as school-choice option), and making conservative appointments to the federal judiciary. The Democratic Party sought to retain its southern political base by promising an orderly process for implementing the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Brown, providing legal remedies through the courts with assistance by the Office of the U.S. Attorney General, and providing financial support to local school districts seeking to desegregate their schools. Nevertheless, the conservatives, over a 50-year period, lost a few struggles but won the political war against court-ordered school desegregation. The national political struggle over school desegregation is discussed in this article, and that struggle continues ...

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3626/is_200407/ai_n9468071/pg_1

Innocent mistakes
November 10, 2007
Paul Krugman

... So there’s a campaign on to exonerate Ronald Reagan from the charge that he deliberately made use of Nixon’s Southern strategy. When he went to Philadelphia, Mississippi, in 1980, the town where the civil rights workers had been murdered, and declared that “I believe in states’ rights,” he didn’t mean to signal support for white racists. It was all just an innocent mistake ...

Similarly, when Reagan declared in 1980 that the Voting Rights Act had been “humiliating to the South,” he didn’t mean to signal sympathy with segregationists. It was all an innocent mistake.

In 1982, when Reagan intervened on the side of Bob Jones University, which was on the verge of losing its tax-exempt status because of its ban on interracial dating, he had no idea that the issue was so racially charged. It was all an innocent mistake.

And the next year, when Reagan fired three members of the Civil Rights Commission, it wasn’t intended as a gesture of support to Southern whites. It was all an innocent mistake ...

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/10/innocent-mistakes/


Ku Klux Klan Rebounds With New Focus On Immigration, ADL Reports

.... The League, which monitors the activities of racist hate groups and reports its findings to law enforcement and policymakers, has documented a noticeable spike in activity by Klan chapters across the country. The KKK believes that the U.S. is "drowning" in a tide of non-white immigration, controlled and orchestrated by Jews, and is vigorously trying to bring this message to Americans concerned or fearful about immigration.

"If any one single issue or trend can be credited with re-energizing the Klan, it is the debate over immigration in America," said Deborah M. Lauter, ADL Civil Rights Director. "Klan groups have witnessed a surprising and troubling resurgence by exploiting fears of an immigration explosion, and the debate over immigration has, in turn, helped to fuel an increase in Klan activity, with new groups sprouting in parts of the country that have not seen much activity." ...

http://www.adl.org/PresRele/Extremism_72/4973_72.htm

KKK anti-immigration rally draws over 300 in Alabama

... At the rally, marchers yelled anti-immigration slogans such as "Send them back." One robed woman held a sign saying "Remember the Alamo, Stop Invasion Now, Save America." ...

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/KKK_antiimmigration_rally_draws_over_300_0506.html

The KKK joins anti-immigrant hate groups in Virginia

The Ku Klux Klan has joined the anti-immigrant efforts of the Minutemen vigilantes and the "HelpSaveVirginia" hate groups in Manassas, Virginia and surrounding communities.

Early Sunday morning the residents of Manassas, located a few miles southwest of Washington D.C., woke up to find their mailboxes stuffed and their driveways littered with thousands of KKK anti-immigrant leaflets. One piece of literature read "End all non-White Immigration" ...

http://www.aztlan.net/kkk_joins_minutemen.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Great post! Alamo fought because of "illegal" Whites in Texas trying to
Edited on Sun Nov-25-07 01:29 AM by McCamy Taylor
steal the territory from Mexico, its rightful sovereign country. So, using "Remember the Alamo" as rallying cry for "Immigrants out" is so inappropriate. However, I will bet that none of these KKKers know any Texas-Mexican history at all. I'll bet that they also do not know that there is an entire museum in Mexico City called "The Museum of the Intervention" which exists to document U.S wars, land grabs and oppression of Mexico.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE7DD103AF934A35752C0A96E948260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all

Much of the museum focuses on the events leading up to and accompanying ''the Mutilation,'' as the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo is often called here. In that treaty, which followed the victory of the United States in the war of 1846-48, Mexico lost more than half its claimed territory, which became the American Southwest.

snip

''These exhibitions have two main threads,'' Ms. Cuevas said. ''One is to show that the general tenor of United States foreign policy is interventionist and the other is to show that there is a capacity for popular resistance on the other side.''


One the main reasons for intervention this century has been to secure control of Mexico's oil at little profit for Mexico. In the 1910's and 20's the U.S. was aggressive about meddling in Mexico's internal affairs, going so far as to finance revolts. It wasn't until the brink of WWII, when FDR was in office and the U.S was too busy contemplating war elsewhere that Mexico was able to nationalize its oil. And as of 2005, the U.S. government was still complaining that Mexico needed to de-nationalize its oil if it wanted any help in upgrading its refining capabilities, even though they are our second largest supplier after Canada.

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0522pemex.html

We recently witnessed the U.S tampering with a Mexican election to prevent the victory of a leftist candidate who vowed to keep Mexico's oil nationalized.

So, how about a big round of criticism for the illegal interventions by U.S. government (and the people it represents which would be us ) that has been going on for almost two centuries against our neighbors to the south and which includes land grabbing, murder, election fraud, attempt to steal oil revenue. None of our actions has helped the people of Mexico one iota in their quest for economic security. The United States--and that means us , the citizens of this country, not someone else--are a bunch of imperialists just like the British we are descended from, who know how to bitch and moan about immigrants at our door but who have conveniently forgetful memories and short sighted eyes when it comes to what we do to our neighbors next door, probably because a whole lot of us do not really believe that any of them matter.

If the people of Mexico are not allowed autonomy by the United States government-- our government --then we can not, in good conscience, say that their problems are not our problems, since our meddling complicates and exacerbates their problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. I suppose "Remember Misión San Antonio de Valero" or "Remember El Alamo" didn't quite have
the desired propaganda value
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
29. Show them this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Yahoo story about "illegal" good samaritan already taken down
Might just be a coincidence. Might not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC