Iraq's 'Three-Block War'

[jpak]

http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/w-me/2007/feb/22/022205793.html

BUHRIZ, Iraq (AP) - In a muddy, half-collapsed police station northeast of Baghdad, in the heart of insurgent territory, 30 American and 60 Iraqi troopers hunker down amid constant mortar fire and study how to undermine an enemy who is literally next door. Such ramshackle compounds are likely signs of the future in Iraq.

Militants, once dismissed as "dead-enders" on their "last legs," continue to confound American tacticians, and U.S. war planners are shifting strategy. Instead of storming an area to drive away militants and then withdrawing to the relative safety of big bases, select forces are being stationed among the insurgents themselves in the heart of communities around Iraq, where soldiers are warned to be "ready each day to be greeted with a handshake or a hand grenade."

The idea is to fight the "three-block war" - in the words of the Pentagon's first new counterinsurgency manual in 20 years, a 242-page document written in part by the new commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus.

The hope is that increased contact with ordinary Iraqis will pay off with goodwill and sharper tips on militant activity and let Iraqi soldiers learn how to rule the streets on their own. But there are obvious risks.

<more>

[Selatius]

1. Holding ground is pointless if you have insufficient numbers of troops to do this.

We would need 500,000+ to pull off this strategy of stationing troops all over the city and the countryside instead of taking ground, holding it for a while, and then withdrawing into fortified bases. The sentiment in Iraq is so anti-American I don't think it's possible to reverse course.