Fresh_Start
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 04:29 PM
Original message |
exactly why are Congresspeople required to be physically |
|
present to vote.
Surely our government ought to be able to develop a secure method for remote voting on legislation. And since the vote will be recorded by who responded, our Congresspeople might actual assure that its an accurate system.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 04:31 PM
Original message |
Fresh_Start
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
2. why is it a joke to you |
|
if you watch CSPAN the room is practically empty most of the time so its not like they are sitting to hear each other debate most of the time
I'm not suggesting that they should never be there, but when a Congressperson is enroute or in their home office, why would it be a bad thing for them to vote remotely?
|
Atman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message |
1. We need to give them another reason NOT to show up for work? |
|
Don't they already have the cushiest "work" schedule in the world?
.
|
Fresh_Start
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. actually I'm thinking it cuts out excused for missing |
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
most of them work their asses off. It's not a cushy job - whether you're in DC or your home district, you're working all the time.
|
Atman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. BWHAHAHA! You always crack me up, MF! |
|
"Work" is a relative term. Is it exhausting to have to dress up and do all that bullshit schmoozing every night, meeting with assholes and pretending you like them and give a shit what they're selling? Sure it is. But it's not WORK, and they get paid a ridiculous salary with benefits worth more than most Americans' annual salaries. Oh, and vacation time that would make an elementary school teacher jealous.
Don't get on me about not knowing what I'm talking about...I may not be a Congress Critter, but I've played that fund raising game, and have been damned good at it. It sucks, you're away from the family too much...but all you're doing is eating nice dinners, attending lavish parties and kissing fat hairy asses hoping to suck some money out of their wallets. It's exhausting, but it's not WORK.
.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. It's not physical labor |
|
but it's work nonetheless.
|
Atman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. It would be "WORK" if they got paid $30,000 a year. |
|
...and had to pay their own way and sleep in a Motel 6.
You'll never convince me, MF, because I've been there. Like I said, sure it's tiring and the schedules can be exhausting. But it is NOT work.
.
|
tkmorris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. I'll just second what you said |
|
Saves time that way. Endless fundraising for your next election is not work. I think MF's habitual contrarianism puts him in some strange positions sometimes.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
to characterize me that way.
I honestly have respect for those who serve in politics - I think it's a hard job and they get no credit.
|
DCKit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
12. Series. They'd all be as huge as Hastert if they were allowed... |
|
to work at home, lounge around in their underwear and eat take-out all day. Then again, the boost to the economy from the sex workers and internet porn sites would be HUGE.
|
sutz12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Yeah, I'm sure Diebold can design a machine that will work. |
rox63
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message |
5. How would you confirm that it's actually them voting? |
|
There's no better way to confirm that than actually having them do it in person.
|
JuniperLea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Because we don't have embedded identification chips yet... eom |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 07:10 PM
Response to Original message |