Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

St. Ronald? I don't think so...LA Times sorts out GOP misconceptions about Reagan.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:13 PM
Original message
St. Ronald? I don't think so...LA Times sorts out GOP misconceptions about Reagan.
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 05:13 PM by ourbluenation
GOP candidates genuflect to his legacy. Trouble is, he didn't do what they say.
By Michael Kinsley

February 1, 2008

In the last few weeks, the Democratic Party has turned on Bill Clinton with the ferocity of 16 years of pent-up resentments. He will not be cut any more slack, and neither will his wife. Meanwhile, the Republican primaries have turned into a Ronald Reagan adoration contest. Neither ex-president deserves what he is getting. Clinton is a victim of long memories; Reagan is a beneficiary of short ones.

snip

But the biggest fairy tale about Reagan is the most central one: about taxes and spending. It is one thing to sit in a North Vietnamese prison in the early 1970s, dreaming of a California governor who one day will balance the federal budget. It is another to imagine that it actually happened.

When Reagan took office in 1981, federal receipts (taxes) were $517 billion and outlays (spending) were $591 billion, for a deficit of $74 billion. When he left office in 1989, taxes were $999 billion and spending was $1.14 trillion, for a deficit of $141 billion. As a share of the economy, Reagan did cut taxes, from 19.6% to 18.4%, and he cut spending from 22.2% to 21.2%, increasing the deficit from 2.6% to 2.8%. The deficit went as high as an incredible 5% of GDP during his term. As a result, the national debt soared by almost two-thirds. You can fiddle with these numbers -- assuming it takes a year or two for a president's policies to take effect, or taking defense costs out -- and the basic result is the same or worse. Whatever, these numbers hardly constitute a "revolution."

snip

If the GOP is looking around for an icon to worship, it might consider Bill Clinton. He cut spending from 21.4% of GDP to 18.5% -- three times as much as Reagan. True, he raised taxes from 17.6% to 19.8%, but that's still a smaller chunk than when Reagan left office. And he left us with an annual surplus that threatened to eliminate the national debt. What's more, I think he's available.



http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-oe-kinsley1feb01,0,2123974.story?track=mostemailedlink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. 6 recs and no replys. weird. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Okay, here's the 7th Rec and a Kick
It's amazing how many people I've spoken to have no idea what Reagan did as governor, and how deified he became after his presidency.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XboxWarrior Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. the reagan myth has always.......
mystified me.

He was an idiot, just like Bush. (but he was a 2-bit actor)

But that phrase, "Tear down these walls", has become his "legacy"

He did no more to stop the U.S.S.R., than I did.

That empire simply failed.......(maybe the Afghan war aided it)

Somehow the Republican party has managed to make him an "Idol"

Hell, it works for that stupid show, "American Idol"

Go Figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well this certainly deserves a look...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. As many of us have said for years - Bill Clinton was the best Republican president we ever had.
And if Bill hadn't spent the 90s PROTECTING the secrecy and privilege of both Reagan and Bush1's administrations, there would be no SAINT Ronnie legacy at all. And NO Bush would have been able to get near the WH ever again, let alone live in it.


http://consortiumnews.com/2006/111106.html

The Reagan-Bush thugs should have been in jail by the end of 1994, not planning their 2000 WH run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. when I think about Bill's legacy,
I think about

NAFTA (a RayGun wetdream that Lumpballs creamed his jeans over)
GATTS - a sovereignity destroying treaty
keeping Greenscum on as Fed Chairman - a man who I can hardly wait for his death so that I can cover his grave in animal excrement)
allowing the last of the Fairness Doctrine to be destroyed
a botched welfare reform that hurt many more than it was good

just my 2 cents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I think the biggest Reagan wetdream moment was "The era of big government is over"
That was the biggest Dem rollover and show pink belly to the entire governing philosophy of Ronald Reagan.....ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. oh, that was good, blm!
I hope my memory is not dimming - I do occasionally try to not remember all of the RayGun/Bush/Bush/Bush/Bush stuff - my head begins to hurt too much

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. At least til 1964 Reagan was a card carrying democrat.
he didn't go over to the republicans til he wanted to run for an office and the democrats wouldn't pick him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bill Clinton was basically a moderate repuke
slightly to the right of Nixon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Republicon homelanders are not into facts. They are into beliefs.
Alas. They do not want real knowledge. They want to cling to the hollow reality they have been propagandizing into believing. Alas for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why did this change into a Bill Clinton thread?
:shrug:

Anyways, I for one have had it with the St. Ronny bs and glad to see someone calling those GOP'rs out on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. The "party poopers" are crawling out of the woodwork. Take that phrase as you will. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Reagan's Liberal Legacy
This article by Joshua Green from 2003 is the best I've seen at debunking the myth of Reagan. It points out how Reagan raised taxes 4 times including an increase in corporate tax rates. He passed the progressive earned income tax credit. He actually wanted total nuclear disarmament. He raised the size of government by 66,000 people while Clinton cut it by 373,000 people. He expanded government by creating the cabinet level Department of Veteran's Affairs. He started the defense cuts that continued under Bush I and Clinton.

While there's quite a bit to dislike about Reagan, he really wasn't the ideologue that * has turned out to be. I love pointing out Green's article to conservatives and watching their heads explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC