Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress Members Call for Hearings on Signing Statement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:33 PM
Original message
Congress Members Call for Hearings on Signing Statement
Congressional Progressive Caucus, http://cpc.lee.house.gov

Barbara Lee Calls For Aggressive Oversight on Bush Move Towards Permanent Military Presence in Iraq

(Washington, DC) - Today Congresswoman Barbara Lee, co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, sent a letter to the Speaker requesting that appropriate Committee Chairs quickly schedule oversight hearings regarding the recent Bush Signing Statement to circumvent a key provision in the Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 4986) against a permanent military presence in Iraq.

The letter, co-authored by Congresswomen Lee, Lynn Woolsey and Maxine Waters, states, “We believe that Congress must find out and the American public made aware of the serious consequences of long-term military basing agreements or treaties that bypass congressional action as the ‘Declaration of Principles’. In addition, it is critical to shed light on the implications of the President’s signing statement and intention to ignore the law. At the same time it is also imperative to give greater scrutiny to the Bush administration’s efforts to maintain a long-term or indefinite military presence in Iraq. Holding hearings will complement the 166 hearings on Iraq that Democrats have held since you became our speaker in January 2007.”

Congresswoman Lee issued the following statement:



“Circumventing this important provision is contrary to the law and oversight hearings are clearly needed for Congress to get answers and for the American public to be assured the law is not being side stepped.

“We need to know why President Bush wants to ignore a key provision he signaled he would uphold by signing the bill into law in the first place.

“This latest action by this Republican administration seems to flagrantly disregard the law of the land. The President has signed into law, five times, legislation that included similar provisions to prohibit permanent military bases in Iraq since 2006 (PL109-289, PL 109-364, PL 110-28, PL 110-116, and PL 110-161.). Now he arbitrarily wants an exemption from the provision in the FY08 Defense Authorization bill.

“We need answers and we need them now. Congress must immediately hold the Bush administration accountable.”

# # #

Congresswoman Barbara Lee (Oakland-D) is co-chair of the Progressive Caucus and a co-founder of the Out of Iraq Caucus. She sits on the House Appropriations Committee, where she serves on the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education Subcommittee, the State Foreign Operations Subcommittee and is Vice-Chair of the Legislative Branch Subcommittee.

LETTER TEXT FOLLOWS:

February 1, 2008

Hon. Nancy Pelosi
Speaker
US House of Representatives
The Capitol
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Speaker Pelosi:

President George W. Bush issued a signing statement on Monday, January 28, 2008 where he signaled his intent to ignore a provision in the FY08 Department of Defense Authorization Bill (PL 110-181) that prohibits permanent military bases in Iraq. We urge you to request the appropriate committee chairs to quickly schedule oversight hearings on this important issue.

We believe this is a particularly contradictory and serious development given that the President has signed similar provisions into law five times before. (PL109-289, PL 109-364, PL 110-28, PL 110-116, and PL 110-161.)

When a majority of the American people are committed to ending our occupation in Iraq on a timeline within a year, in making this proclamation President Bush has only reinforced what we have always known; that he intends our occupation in Iraq to be indefinite.

Sadly, this is a pattern of behavior from a White House that seems intent on cutting Congress out of any decisions relating to the permanent stationing of the US military in Iraq. At the end of last year, without any congressional input, President Bush and Prime Minister al-Maliki signed a “Declaration of Principles for a Long-Term Relationship of Cooperation and Friendship Between the Republic of Iraq and the United States of America” that will set the stage for future agreements on the disposition of US troops in Iraq and other wide-ranging aspects of this important bilateral relationship. (We introduced H.R. 5128, legislation disapproving of any agreement that doesn’t have the approval of both houses of Congress and that of the Iraqi Parliament, too)

We believe that Congress must find out and the American public made aware of the serious consequences of long-term military basing agreements or treaties that bypass congressional action as the ‘Declaration of Principles’. In addition, it is critical to shed light on the implications of the President’s signing statement and intention to ignore the law. At the same time it is also imperative to give greater scrutiny to the Bush administration’s efforts to maintain a long-term or indefinite military presence in Iraq. Holding hearings will complement the 166 hearings on Iraq that Democrats have held since you became our speaker in January 2007.

We appreciate your strong leadership and commitment in ending the US occupation of Iraq and look forward to working with you on this matter.

Sincerely,

BARBARA LEE
Member of Congress

LYNN WOOSLEY
Member of Congress

MAXINE WATERS
Member of Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nancy's Statement on the matter
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Bush:


"I reject the notion in his signing statement that he can pick and choose which provisions of this law to execute," said Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of California. "His job, under the Constitution, is to faithfully execute the law - every part of it - and I expect him to do just that."

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2008/01/30/bush_asserts_authority_to_bypass_defense_act/


SHE EXPECTS HIM TO DO JUST THAT!!!!! LOL!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Of course she expects it from such a "wonderful man"...
:puke:

Did you actually expect anything better from Pelosi??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well, I 'expect' we will see her uphold the Constitution too
but nobody expects the spanish inquisition, let alone the 'inherit contempt' that
has been shown by those in power to the rule of law.

I expect these children to behave
I expect I will go to work tomorrow
I expect that the sun will rise tomorrow.



Man that word expect has such power and force doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JFN1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Give it up, for comedian Nancy Pelosi
and let's have a nice round of applause for her, folks! And while you're at it, don't forget to tip your waitresses and bartenders!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. she expects him to do that???
what Nancy you expect a psychotic with mental disorders to execute the law??? yea, Nancy I bet * will do just that!!:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. the law's not on the table Nancy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Good one! n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
When will Congress IMPEACH Bush and Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. *snicker*
*This* Congress?????


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


:hi: malaise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. LOL
:hi: Ghost!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Lee, Woosley and Waters? The Left, the liberal, the ignored.
Maybe they're even hysterical. :sarcasm: Figures that they stand for us, while the centrists hide if it's at all possible. Don't want to endanger those corporate checks and that sterling statesman reputation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. *'s defense (if he ever needs one)? Because they let me, your honor. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. why are they surprized about permanent bases? that was the plan all along
are all the congress critters stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Great, another possible hearing
that will end with nothing done. Oh wait, maybe Pelosi will write another strongly worded letter, that will straighten * up and get him on the straight and narrow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. She 'expects' bush to follow the constitution.
I posted her lame response
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hearings, hearings, hearings.
There's plenty of evidence. Impeach the criminals or stop wasting your time and energy!

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. yea, sure we all know what is going to happen to this request.
in the circular file, and a big FU from *. And this letter is going to Pelosi???? good luck with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Ervin jret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. we need to be made aware? you idiots need to wake up!
WE ARE VERY WELL AWARE INDEED THAT THE PRESIDENT HAS BEEN IGNORING THE LAWS OF THE LAND!

And he has been doing so for quite some time now.

Welcome to the party.:party: :party:

idiots:dunce: :dunce: :grr: :boring: :boring: :boring: stop sleeping on the job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC