Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's make a list - Things that Bush Senior did, but were blamed on Bill Clinton...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:28 PM
Original message
Let's make a list - Things that Bush Senior did, but were blamed on Bill Clinton...
Okay, there's the military base closures...

NAFTA

Black Hawk Down


Any others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. ???? last time I looked Clinton signed NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. All the groundwork was laid by Bush Sr. and basically left for Clinton to sign.
I disagreed with his doing so, but if he had not signed it, it would have been an extremely bold move for a newly inaugurated president...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And Bush put a gun to his head and made him sign it then parade around...
extolling its virtues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. sorry, Bill loved NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Well far be it for a newly elected president to make an extremely bold move,
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 11:21 PM by MadHound
Wait, shall we ask FDR that question, see how that First Hundred Days plan worked out? How about LBJ? Hell, even Reagan went into extremely bold mode seven months into his administration over the air traffic controllers strike while Clinton signed NAFTA, what, ten months into his first term:eyes:

Stop rationalizing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. NAFTA had already been signed when Clinton took office.
Once it was ratified, he signed it, but at least he pushed for NAAEC and NAALC to address some environmental and labor concerns with the original NAFTA pact.

Again, I disagree with Clinton's decision, but if he hadn't signed, it would have been a political mess, pulling the US out of a trade pact it had already signed, and he had run on a platform of being a "new democrat" friendly to business interests.

I'm not trying to absolve him of all responsibility for NAFTA, but the way a lot of people talk, you'd think that Clinton had written the damn thing himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Umm, NAFTA was voted on in the House on 11/17/93, in the Senate on 11/20/93
Like I said, Clinton was ten months into his first term.

He could have easily come out against it, he had the time, but instead he supported it and signed it. And look at the much bigger mess that we have now. US manufacturing sector is gone, Mexican agricultural sector is gone(a large source of the illegal immigration problem), and a violent transition to a service sector economy.

And it isn't like these consequences weren't known going in, many of the top economists were speaking out and advising against the passage of this bill into law. Yet Clinton pushed for it and signed it anyway.

Sorry, but Clinton sacrificed the working man and woman on the alter of business interests. His hands weren't tied, he was fully aware of what he was doing and what would happen. Yet he did it anyway.

That is the historical reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. It was RATIFIED in 93. The US had already signed it in 1992.
Yes, he supported it, but the fact is that if he hadn't signed it, he would have been backing the US out of a trade pact we had already signed.


http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761579853/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement.html


In December 1992 NAFTA was signed by the leaders of the three countries—Brian Mulroney of Canada, Carlos Salinas de Gortari of Mexico, and George H. W. Bush of the United States. Despite approval from national leaders, the agreement would not be made effective until the legislatures in all three countries had also voted to accept it.

Clinton signed the ratification by Congress. It was Bush that signed the agreement itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Remember your basic civics lesson
It has to be ratified by both the House and the Senate and signed off by the President, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAFTA>

Just because this was a treaty doesn't mean that Clinton had to follow through on it, witness Kyoto.

Sorry, but your parsing bullshit trying to protect the Clintons. Stop, you're just making yourself look foolish and ignorant.

Clinton had every chance to stop this treaty, instead he supported it, and signed off on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I'm not saying that he didn't.
I'm saying that doing so would have meant reversing course on a pact that the Bush had already signed and the congress had approved.

I'm not saying that he shouldn't have refused to sign, but it wasn't his baby, he basically tied the ribbon on top.

If we are going to malign someone for NAFTA, I'd say that Clinton, Bush and the Congress are all responsible.

And again, Clinton did at least push for labor and environmental protections - something I doubt Poppy would have done.


You may be right though, that NAFTA doesn't belong on the list I described...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
water Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Funny you mention that... Hoover actually started many of the New Deal programs!
FDR expanded them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Or how about Bush's man-date?
I love it when Democrats argue that we need to toe the line while Republicans are allowed to run right over it at will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Yep. Clinton was the champion of NAFTA.
unfortunately.

Although, Bush Sr would have loved to champion it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. The problem is that you can't claim absolution by continuing
your predecessor's programs.

Black Hawk down ... in fall '93. Clinton was on board, Commander in Chief. What started as a decent mission--protecting food deliveries--morphed. He could have unmorphed or remorphed it. He didn't in the 9 months he had it.

Military base closures didn't have to continue. They could have stopped cold. They didn't. But they were part of the "peace dividend"--a cold peace, apparently.

Clinton could have lobbied hard against NAFTA and demanded renegotiating it. He didn't. Instead he pushed for it's passage in a dem-controlled Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiamondJay Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Bush Sr sent troops to Somalia in Dec 92
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 01:32 AM by DiamondJay
a month before leaving office which is a dirty trick. He did it to hurt Clinton, because he knew some of the Bush people like Colin Powell and Major General William F. Garrison may still be there to screw things. Major General William F. Garrison even sent Clinton a letter of full responsibility, as seen on a link somewhere in this thread in the PBS timeline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Definitely a last-minute mess left in Clinton's lap
Spiteful old bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiamondJay Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. and its gonna suck a lot worse for the next president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Waco and the Branch Davidians
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 10:57 PM by TahitiNut
:shrug:

All the planning and preparation for WTC-I was done during Reagan/Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. How did that have anything to do with Bush?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. How did it not? 100% of the federal officials were Reagan/Bush appointees.
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 12:36 PM by TahitiNut
The fuse was put in place and lit in 1992, during the Bush adminstration, by Bush officials. The surveillance was established and grossly mismanaged by Bushies. The assault was planned and scheduled to occur 5 weeks into the Clinton adminstration, BEFORE Clinton was able to get an Attorney General confirmed. (Remember Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood?) Janet Reno took office on March 11. The final siege occured in April. There was no way that any of it was initiated by Clinton officials and the falsehoods (e.g. fraudulent claims of drug production) were concocted by Bushites - along, no doubt, with misinformation fed to Reno.

It was a "time bomb" planted by Bushites. :shrug: I gotta hand it to Reno - she stepped up an took the blame even when she didn't deserve it. She accepted full responsibility for what occured "on her watch" even though she was grossly ill-served by the holdovers from the Bush adminstration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ruby Ridge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Somalia invasion
US President George Bush launches Somalia intervention
Deteriorating security prevents the UN mission from delivering food and supplies to the starving Somalis. Relief flights are looted upon landing, food convoys are hijacked and aid workers assaulted. The UN appeals to its members to provide military forces to assist the humanitarian operation.

With only weeks left in his term as president, George Bush responds to the UN request, proposing that US combat troops lead an international UN force to secure the environment for relief operations. On December 5, the UN accepts his offer, and Bush orders 25,000 US troops into Somalia. On December 9th, the first US Marines land on the beach.

Bush assures the American people and troops involved that this is not an open ended commitment; the objective is to quickly provide a secure environment so that food can get through to the starving Somalis, and then the operation will be turned over to the UN peacekeeping forces. He assures the public that he plans for the troops to be home by Clinton's inauguration in January.

This US-led United Task Force (UNITAF) is dubbed "Operation Restore Hope."

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/ambush/etc/cron.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Arming Saddam..
Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush sold hundreds of millions of dollars worth of weapons and provided the technology for Saddam's chemical, biological and nuclear programs.

The reasoning of the Reagan/Bush administrations for arming Iraq was that while Saddam was certainly an odious human being, he could serve as the region's policeman. He might be a bastard, but he was "our bastard". At the time, Iraq was fighting a war with Iran and the United States was worried that a victory for Saddam's nemesis could result in the spread of fundamentalist Islamic regimes which would destabilize the region and block our access to the oil in the Middle East.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/02/12/13_iraq.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. Reducing US Armed Forces and military spending.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. He left Clinton a foreign policy mess
Haiti
Bosnia
Somalia

and of course Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. And Bill Clinton was the perfect antidote!
Clinton was EXCELLENT with his international relations. Bill Clinton had foreign crowds cheering upon his arrival.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
22. The Oklahoma City Bombing - Indirectly anyway...
The War to get Iraq out of Kuwait (an invasion that Bush's ambassador April Glaspie implicitly INVITED) was largely responsible for turning McViegh into a terrorist nutball...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
25. The plotting of the 1993 WTC bombing - FBI was sitting on a stack od untranslated
documents - containing everything they needed to have prevented that one.
It happened within weeks of Clinton taking office - authors brought to justice - no war on terra needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC