Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is a "Liberal Republican"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 09:55 PM
Original message
What is a "Liberal Republican"
The pundit on MSNBC was talking about Republicans in three categories: Very Conservative, Moderate and Liberal. I can't imagine what a "liberal" Republican would believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Richard Nixon, imo...

...pushed some fairly liberal agendas. As much as he is hated, he did more for liberal causes than most of the Dem. presidents that came after him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. if nixon was`t a paranoid and a drunk
he`d been a decent president..."kinda" like bill clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. maybe better...
...than Clinton! Nixon started the EPA, affirmative action, and more stuff I'm to lazy to think of now...lol. I like CLinton, but he was pretty moderate, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. noooooooo!
Sheesh I hate that theory. Nixon was a right wing batshit fucknut. He was president at the tail end of the liberal new deal era, and since then this country has swung way far to the batshit fucknut right. Consequently some of the programs Nixon supported appear relative moderate or liberal now, but I can assure you that this was just political expedience on his part at the time. Nixon was the worst president ever, until recent events removed him from that spot in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. still that stuff happened...

...under his watch. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheUniverse Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
43. Regardless of any "liberal" things Nixon accomplished, I will always remember him as...
the butcher of Cambodia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Same as "Miltary Intelligence?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. moderate republicans exist
liberal republicans do not, conservative democrats however are loud and proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. That was my thought. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
56. Very well said. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReformedChris Donating Member (252 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
67. Barry Goldwater, might have had many faults but he had MANY liberal/libertarian views...
He supported his daughters choice to have an abortion and was generally disgusted at the religious zealots taking over the republican party. He was a person that truly felt that government was the enemy. The fact that he never wavered in the face of all he was faced with in the 80's made me respect the man, even if I mostly disagreed with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. Oh Barry
What a breath of fresh air he'd be in the republican party right now. I wonder if he'd even be electable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. An Oxymoron



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. I Think We Have a Winner. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. a repuke who doesn't support torture
:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Someone who died long before now.
They don't exist anymore.

Gerald Ford, Howard Baker, and a few others were the last that could even be called "moderate."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. "I don't know, but if you hum a few lines..."
:rofl:

I crack myself up.

I really do.


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Lincoln Chaffee
Look him up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. yeah, i was about to mention his name...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. I was one, then I realized I wasn't a Republican and became a Democrat.
Edited on Tue Feb-05-08 11:28 PM by SharonAnn
That's the first step.

These are the three phases:
1. Liberal Republican
2. Moderate Independent
3. Liberal/Moderate Democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #34
42. Thanks for that Response
I guess that was my question. Why not be a Dem if you're going to consider yourself a liberal Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
48. And former Congressman Leach of Iowa probably too
Unfortunately, they both had to go because they were enablers to the bushites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #48
79. Chafee definitely had to go for control of the Seante, Leach I might've actually not minded keeping
There are more seats in the House than the Senate so every individual seat matters a bit less in terms of getting a majority. Leach was a big supporter of banning PAC contributions and that's a huge issue for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oxymorons used to try to depict republicans as being something thay are not - diverse
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. One who respects the dead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. A Fascist in tragic poses. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. Liberal Republicans want sex , drugs and R&R,
like Arnold, they just don't want to pay for it and they don't want to admit that they might have to share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. wow you nailed it!
ya i`ve known a few of them since the 60`s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. And They Want to do "it" in the closet. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
47. Hugh Hefner is a Republican????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
64. No, Hugh Hefner does pay for it and he champions liberal
causes from what I can tell. I haven't read a Playboy in decades but I don't think he's a Republican. His sexism really isn't much different from the sexism we run into here in DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. centrist democrats...
liberal republicans in my day would be centrist democrats of today..of course define centrist democrats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. There are plenty of them
Socially liberal and financialy conservative. It's not so hard to wrap your mind around. Just like there are conservative democrats.

Not everyone is liberal or conservative on every single issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. I Would Call Them Moderate as opposed to liberal. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. Bill Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. An extinct species hounded to death by Neocons and theocrats. It was sad to see them go. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
71. Yep, there was a genocide against them and they are extinct now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
22. Massachusetts Republicans are quite liberal.
Especially compared to the rest of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Not the one currently running for President...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
39. Because he is actually a republican from Utah.
He is campaigning not as Massachusetts republican. Look at our former governors who were (r)...Weld, Cellucci and Swift. At a minimum on the litmus scale..all pro-gay and pro-choice. There you have it.
Romney, when he ran for Senate attempted to run to the left of Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedStateShame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #22
44. Wasn't William Weld what one may consider a liberal Republican?
I seem to remember he ruffled a few GOP feathers during his time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #44
77. Yes, he is.
He was actually at the wedding of two friends of mine. A GAY wedding. There were actually a number of well know republicans in house. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. in Spain is a RW facist (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. John McCain
Of course, the people who think that also think Benito Mussolini was too liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
31. A "pro-choice" Republican
One not hung up on the social/religious issues - just the economic ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
32. They don't wear their jackboots on Casual Fridays
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
33. A DLC member?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loser_user Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
35. A republican in denial?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
36. you mean i'm not "The Last Unicorn"?
:+ :bounce:

yay, there's other "liberal republicans" out there! "we" even got "our" own category on the news! i wonder if i can already start pushing the idea that "liberal republicans" do not think socialism is all that bad... and then i'll work up to "taxes feel good!"
:evilgrin:

insurrection begins within -- like cancer! :7 yay, i'm not alone! MSNBC gives me legitimacy! i am no longer the cheese that stands alone! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
37. A mugger who leaves the singles in your wallet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
38. Well, historically, Nixon and Rockefeller. Conceivably Bloomberg.
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 02:46 AM by dmesg
Though Nixon came to that wing of the party only after he lost to JFK in 1960. After he and Rockefeller left the scene the wing pretty much dried up, though some put Chafee, Specter, Snowe, the Guvernator, the old Romney, and a few others in a "new liberal republican" class. The only person who conceivably has continuity with the Nixon/Rockefeller line today is Bloomberg, and he has repudiated the GOP in name at least.

As Dennis Miller rightly said before he went batshit insane, "Once upon a time in this country we had two parties and separate from that two political ideologies."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
40. An oxy-moran?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
41. Akin to a "liberal" who backs rightward corporatists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
45. A "liberal" Repub is somebody like former Senator Lincoln Chafee.
His kind is a dying breed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #45
49. What Does Senator Chafee Believe In?
Why does he "hold" on to the title Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #49
57. I remember he said before he left that perhaps it was best that Dems won in 2006.
This, after he was ousted from his seat. He saw what the Repub leadership had done under Bush, and for him, he wasn't that blind to reality. He's likely one of those old-school Paleocons or Goldwater Republican holdovers as far as I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
46. Teddy Roosevelt he was the last liberal Republican to occupy the White House
Since then it's been one lunatic,crazy after another (Ike being somewhat of an exception).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
50. It would be instructive
to read the platform of a current Democratic candidate for POTUS. One of them fits the bill, despite the D next to his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #50
54. What is That Platform?
That is what I'm trying to get at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donk Yore Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
51. Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. from 1948
excerpts:

Left and Right, indeed, have become the characteristic political terms of our time. Without specific color or content, they define the polar ends of the political spectrum - a spectrum in which the word Center, fashionable a generation or two ago, is harder and harder to find. Yet the terms themselves have bred a new confusion. They were adequate to the political simplicities of the nineteenth century, when the Right meant those who wished to preserve the existing order and the Left meant those who wished to change it. But the twentieth century, here as elsewhere, introduced new ambiguities.

The Fascists, for example, were not conservative in any very meaningful sense. They did not wish to preserve the existing order, or even to turn back the clock to some more stable century. They purposefully planned to transform the existing order into a new and all-absorbing authoritarianism, based upon the energies and frustrations of modern industrialism. The Fascists, in a meaningful sense, were revolutionaries. Yet their totalitarian ideal hardly fitted into the pattern of the Left, which had been the traditional home of greater freedoms and more generous aspirations. So, after boggling and uncertainty, they were assigned positions on the far Right.

Such developments make it urgent that, in the interests of clear thinking, we abandon the word Left. A united Left is an illusion: the question of freedom vs. totalitarianism cannot be compromised. When we talk about the Left, we mean either the pro-Communist Left or the non-Communist Left; and, when this vital distinction becomes part of our thinking, we will enormously sharpen our understanding of foreign affairs. If we will understand further that the non-Communist Left and the non-Fascist Right share a common faith in free political society - a faith that the differences between them over economic issues can be best works out by discussion and debate under law - we might even stop talking of Left and Right as if nothing lay in between.

Yeats long ago had an apocalyptic vision:

Things fall apart; the
center cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed
upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is
Loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence
is drowned;
The best lack all conviction,
while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.


http://www.writing.upenn.edu/~afilreis/50s/schlesinger-notrightleft.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
52. A socially enlightened rich greedy bastard
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 10:23 AM by Strawman
That's probably not completely fair. There are also some older good government Ike Republican types who have been left behind by the drift of their party, whom I respect, like our ex-Governor Bill Milliken. He's a rare bird these days and usually endorses Democratic candidates in gubenatorial and presidential elections.

A liberal Republican these days is basically a libertarian who cares more about tax cuts than social issues or civil liberties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #52
61. like an M & M: liberal candy coating over chocolaty center of greed
as opposed to their current Jesus coating
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
53. A right leaning moderate. Nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
55. I know plenty of social liberals who inexplicably vote Republican
My step-FIL is one of these: pro-gay rights, pro-choice, anti-war, yet votes Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #55
72. Ummmm why would they vote Repub?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
58. they are defined as libertarians. pot smoking repukes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
59. Or the converse, a Conservative Liberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
60. Mark Hatfield in Oregon about 20 years ago...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
62. Socially Liberal, Greedy, Wants Tax Cuts
that's what I've found. None of the republican's I know are in the least bit conservative, but they want those tax cust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
63. Once upon a time . . .
The Rockefeller wing of the GOP was often called "liberal Republicans." In addition to New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller, it included Senator Jacob Javitz (R-NY) who authored the Javitz amendment cutting off funds for the Vietnam war, Senator Lowell Weicker of Connecticut and Michigan Governor George Romney (that's right, Mitt's old man). While emphasizing a business-friendly Republican policies, they still found money for social programs supported by many Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
65. a nazi professional torturer
who leaves a generous tip at a restaurant once in awhile if he gets drunk enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
66. I have found that people who call themselves "liberal"
republicans are basically progressive democrats who love money too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oak2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
69. Depends on whether you're talking about genuine liberal republicans (extinct) or
what the current batch of ultra-right fascists call "liberal".

Liberal Republicans were, once upon a time ago (maybe 30-40 years ago) genuine liberals. They opposed the war, opposed the draft, supported social spending, etc.

I know, I was one. I became a Republican because many liberals in Cook County chose to become Republicans in protest against the Daley machine. If anything I've become more conservative over the years, yet I find myself these days to the left of the Democratic Party.

Starting with the Reagan years it became increasingly difficult to remain a liberal Republican. Liberal Republicans who held office found themselves facing well-funded primary challengers (and in the case of Lowell Weiker vs. Joe Lieberman, a successful conservative "Democratic" challenger) and increasingly liberals were driven out of party positions. By the 90's even the moderates were being forced out of office. Eventually, I realized, not only had I not been able to in good conscience vote for any Republicans on the ballot, there was no reasonable prospect that I ever again would see a liberal or moderate Republican on my ballot. I took that as a hint to get out ;)

The current batch of Republicans are, in reality, a mix of fascists and quasi-fascists and more traditional (but still way to the right) conservatives, with a smattering of moderates like Lincoln Chafee. It's those moderates and conservatives that get painted as "liberal" in the party. They are no such thing, not by any reasonable measure. Such claims are a part of the propaganda effort to drive this country way over the brink, by willfully distorting the political spectrum. The extremists know they can't possibly sell their agenda if it is correctly labeled, so they've put a great deal of energy into distorting our political language. And as we know, most pundits function as broken sewer pipes, spewing the propaganda they ingest at one end back out at the masses.


BTW, Nixon was never considered a liberal Republican among Republicans. He was considered a moderate to conservative Republican, and liberal Republicans despised him. If he had been a liberal, I wouldn't have worked for McGovern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
70. A republican that weighs over 300 lbs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
73. They used to exist, and still do in corners in the northeast
Socially liberal, fiscally conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
74. Well, the Bush administration has been pretty Liberal
about helping themselves to the National Treasury...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
75. An urban legend. A myth. A falsehood. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
76. A conservative Democrat in the other party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
78. Okay, I give up. Wait! An oxymoran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC