How the spooks took over the news

[FourScore]

In his controversial new book, Nick Davies argues that shadowy intelligence agencies are pumping out black propaganda to manipulate public opinion – and that the media simply swallow it wholesale.

On the morning of 9 February 2004, The New York Times carried an exclusive and alarming story. The paper's Baghdad correspondent, Dexter Filkins, reported that US officials had obtained a 17-page letter, believed to have been written by the notorious terrorist Abu Musab al Zarqawi to the "inner circle" of al-Qa'ida's leadership, urging them to accept that the best way to beat US forces in Iraq was effectively to start a civil war.

The letter argued that al-Qa'ida, which is a Sunni network, should attack the Shia population of Iraq: "It is the only way to prolong the duration of the fight between the infidels and us. If we succeed in dragging them into a sectarian war, this will awaken the sleepy Sunnis."

Later that day, at a regular US press briefing in Baghdad, US General Mark Kimmitt dealt with a string of questions about The New York Times report: "We believe the report and the document is credible, and we take the report seriously... It is clearly a plan on the part of outsiders to come in to this country and spark civil war, create sectarian violence, try to expose fissures in this society." The story went on to news agency wires and, within 24 hours, it was running around the world.

There is very good reason to believe that that letter was a fake – and a significant one because there is equally good reason to believe that it was one product among many from a new machinery of propaganda which has been created by the United States and its allies since the terrorist attacks of September 2001.

For the first time in human history, there is a concerted strategy to manipulate global perception. And the mass media are operating as its compliant assistants, failing both to resist it and to expose it...

MORE AT:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/how-the-spooks-took-over-the-news-780672.html

[davidwparker]

1. Mike Malloy talks about CIA being at CNN when he was there.

[Donnachaidh]

2. It makes it easier for a spineless *journalist* when the copy is written for them

Even Bob Woodward, as much of a hack he's become - had to actually DO some REPORTING and INVESTIGATIVE research to become a "legend". Now we have *journalists* who are embedded with the troops, who do nothing but report what they are told to report. :puke:

[TacticalPeek]

3. Journalism and the CIA: The Mighty Wurlitzer

"For the first time in human history, there is a concerted strategy to manipulate global perception."

Hardly:

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/CIAPRESS.HTM