Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rewarding (Conservative) Failure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:48 PM
Original message
Rewarding (Conservative) Failure
from OurFuture.org:




Rewarding (Conservative) Failure
By Rick Perlstein

February 11th, 2008 - 3:38pm ET


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At the National Review Online they're reporting the results of their reader poll on who should be John McCain's running mate:

Governors Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota and Haley Barbour of Mississippi tie for second place, though Pawlenty is edging ahead even as I write.

Pawlenty supporters are convinced that he has a big future. One reader wrote, “He’s young, energetic, has a good grasp of policy, and won re-election in a blue state in 2006.” Another: “He appeals to the vast majority of the conservative grassroots while bringing in moderates, and he’d shore up support in important Midwest swing states like Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin.” “He won’t alienate the media. He has co-chaired McCain’s campaign since the beginning and remained loyal in the dark days of autumn.” Furthermore, unlike McCain, Pawlenty is sound on immigration; and “his wife, an articulate former judge, is a Baptist and he attends her church.” (A professionally accomplished wife is a big plus in my book.) And “Pawlenty has held the line on fiscal conservatism and kept his ‘no new taxes’ pledge, vetoing more than 50 bills sent to him by a tax-and-spend Democratic legislature.”

As it happens, the current conventional wisdom among strategists is that Pawlenty is the man. To win this year, the GOP will need to hold all the states that Bush won — unlikely — or to bring over some that he narrowly lost. Minnesota tops that list. His downside is that he has no national presence....


That's funny. Around here we consider his downside the fact that he put on a dumb show for Grover Norquist style conservatives by holding up a giant prop "VETO" stamped as he canceled an extra $300 million a year for the Minnesota Department of Transportation because it involved a small tax increase. Then said to the public-spirited Minnesota legislators who dared suggested that Minnesota's roads and bridges needed work: "How dumb can they be?"

Two years later, thirteen Minnesotans died in a bridge collapse...

To conservatives, he "has a big future."

http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/rewarding-conservative-failure

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC