hiaasenrocks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:01 PM
Original message |
Breaking: Henry Waxman announces hearing to examine baseball's "infield fly rule." |
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If they did that we definitely wouldn't have time to Impeach.
|
mcctatas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Is that before or after the hearings on the pork lobby's undue |
|
influence over competetive eating?
|
DefenseLawyer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Competitive eating has flown under the radar for too long! |
|
Every year untold hundreds of kids try to mimic their favorite competitive eating stars by eating a whole box of delicious Hostess Twinkies or those little chocolate donuts, result in stomach aches for all. What about the children?????
|
Dr.Phool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message |
3. But, what about instant replay? |
provis99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Thank god the Congress has taken up this truly important problem |
|
I hope they spend weeks and weeks on the designated hitter rule, too.
|
kerstin
(519 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Now THAT'S something to get steamed about! |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 04:56 PM by kerstin
In political terms, that would be like having one set of rules for the Republicans and one for the Democrats!
Hey wait a minute...:freak:
P.S. The DH::puke:
|
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message |
6. ...to be followed by a hearing on the NFL's time out rule. |
ProgressiveFool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Is that a separate discussion over the one investigating the material components |
|
used in the making of challenge flags? A person could get hurt, you know.
|
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Oh yeah! They're determined to spend lots of time on each of these important issues. |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 04:33 PM by notsodumbhillbilly
|
Ilsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
14. I've always had issues with that 2-minute warning thingy. nt |
Bluzmann57
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
There are some umpires who should be investigated. Go get'em Waxman! :sarcasm:
|
icnorth
(954 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Good Lord, the "infield fly rule"? |
|
He must know the designated batter thing is causing nightmares in the N.L., and then there's that strike zone synchronization debacle. What a wuss!!
|
Gothmog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message |
12. There is a classic Law Review Article (satire) on the Infield Fly Rule |
|
One of the funniest things that I have read was a law review article on the infield fly rule. It was a parody of a real law review article but had well researched footnotes and was in classic law review article format.
|
Kadie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message |
13. and next on the agenda, the designated hitter. n/t |
RL3AO
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Damn infield fly rule. |
aint_no_life_nowhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I hope they move on to Lacrosse and bowling next |
|
We have to root out corruption everywhere it can possibly exist.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 01:52 AM
Response to Original message |