Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Real Reason the Senate Passed the FISA Immunity Bill (it isn't blackmail)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:49 PM
Original message
The Real Reason the Senate Passed the FISA Immunity Bill (it isn't blackmail)
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 02:12 PM by leveymg
For Congressional leadership, the threat of prosecution for agreeing to the The Program is enough. For the membership, the threat of retaliation by the leadership if they don't go along with immunity usually suffices. Blackmail of individual Senators by Bush-Cheney wasn't even necessary.

In intelligence lingo, to be "read-in" means that that a classified program is revealed to you, and you agree to keep it secret under the terms of a standard government security agreement.

By law, all officially acknowledged covert programs are revealed to Congressional leaders designated an intelligence oversight role. This group is known as "The Gang of Eight".



However, being read-in sometimes holds some risk. If the classified program isn't entirely legal, that potentially makes you a co-conspirator in a crime along with Administration officials. Unless, you can make the crime go away.

So it is for all involved in approving NSA Warrantless Wiretapping and CIA Torture.

It came out about six weeks ago that key Democratic leaders -- the senior Dems on the House and Senate Intel Commitees (Harmon and Rockefeller)and the Minority Leaders in the House and Senate (Pelosi and Reid) -- were read into the detainee torture program back in 2003. Along with four of their Republican colleagues. Harmon claims, when she was told about it, she opposed destruction of the torture tapes. Similarly, Rockefeller recently produced a dated letter from a locked safe about the warrantless wiretapping Program after he was informed about that in 2002 (the letter basically says he didn't really understand what he was being told and agreed to).

The fact is, the FISA revision law that contains wiretapping immunity is CYA by the leadership. It effectively grants immunity to the Gang of Eight, too. The rest of the members know what the leadership will do to them if they don't go along with passage of the immunity legislation. The House leadership has considerably less discipline over the membership than the Senate, so there may be some chance that immunity doesn't make it through the conference Bill.

We'll see. The more you know about what's really going on, the less likely they'll get away with it.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can you be made an accessory to a crime involuntarily?
Sounds like a classic Catch 22.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, not crimes requiring Mens Rea (Guilty Mind)
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 02:08 PM by leveymg
Guilty minds were required for this. Also, there was a choice.

When told, each of the Gang of Eight could have give up their security clearance and revealed these programs to the public. But, they didn't - and, they all lied about it afterwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC