Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Condominium owners tell smokers: Take it outside (but not on balcony either)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:24 PM
Original message
Condominium owners tell smokers: Take it outside (but not on balcony either)
Condominium owners tell smokers: Take it outside

Residents at La Rive in Minneapolis voted to make their building smoke-free. It brings the fight over smoking bans into the living room.

By JIM BUCHTA, Star Tribune

Last update: February 13, 2008 - 10:10 PM

Residents of a tony, high-rise condominium along the Mississippi River in Minneapolis are among the first to vote to make their building smoke-free, taking Minnesota's battle over smoking bans into private homes.

The rule, at La Rive Condominiums near St. Anthony Main, covers individual units, common areas, garages and private balconies. Current owners who want to smoke will be grandfathered in, but future buyers will have to abide by the rule.

Opponents say the ban is an intrusion into private property rights that could hurt resale prospects at a time when the market is already soft. Supporters counter that, not only do they have a right to breathe clean air, but nonsmoking potential buyers will see going smoke-free as a plus.

http://www.startribune.com/local/15617577.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Privacy is not a priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. If it's unobtrusive, no one will no you're smoking in your condo...
On the other hand, if they can smell it, they'll know you're smoking, and since they can smell it, it will harm their health, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think if the condo was marketed as non-smoking from its construction, it would be fair.
Suddenly changing the bylaws so that smokers can no longer use their units as when they bought them is unfair and unreasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No it only applies to new residents
The current residents are all grandfathered. When the unit is sold it turns into a non-smoking unit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Eh, I guess that's no biggie then...
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. To me, it would depend on the heating and air conditioning system
If it's a forced air system and all the units are on the same system, this ban makes a lot of sense, although people who use ashtrays/butt cans out on the balcony shouldn't be penalized.

I've lived in apartment units where people who smoked shared it with everybody else, whether or not we all wanted it. It was miserable. I broke leases because of it.

I've also lived in buildings with steam heat where there was only a faint smell of smoke out in the hallways. It wasn't perfume, but it didn't bother my asthma so I stayed in those buildings a lot longer.

So this might or might not be an unreasonable intrusion into private space. It all depends on whose space is being intruded upon and how.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. it's for future owners, that rule will be the bylaws, they'll be informed, whats the big deal?
people looking to buy will now have a choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. What kind of cracker boxes are they anyway, and who would want one if the walls are made out of
paper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. We formerly lived in a townhouse that featured a "modified firewall".
There was a six-inch gap in the top of the wall between units. We were not aware of this (despite a stringent inspection,) before we bought our condo in a brand-new development. The next-door-neighbors (who moved in after we did,) were chain smokers. We ended up selling. Thank God someone bought that didn't mind the smoke that drifted into our house 24 hours a day.

I think that people should be able to smoke in their own homes, especially if it's a home one's already purchased. It's not my business. Outside? Not my business. If they want to smoke in their car, I'll drive my own car.

The only way that building should have gone smoke free (and again, I don't smoke,) is if it had been agreed on from its inception. People can move out of an apartment. They will have much more trouble (and financial disadvantage,) trying to sell a condo in this market.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'd start pan-frying liver.
Just to fuck with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. What the hell?
"..not only do they have a right to breathe clean air..."

Kay, that argument only goes so far. When you start talking about not letting people smoke in their own homes, that line of reasoning gets a bit silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC