Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reid: Bush Attempting to "Manufacture A Crisis"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:31 AM
Original message
Reid: Bush Attempting to "Manufacture A Crisis"
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/reid_bush_attempting_to_manufa.php

Reid: Bush Attempting to "Manufacture A Crisis"
By Paul Kiel - February 14, 2008


This morning, Bush stuck to the plan and tried to bring the squeeze on the House:

This Saturday at midnight, legislation authorizing intelligence professionals to quickly and effectively monitor terrorist communications will expire. If Congress does not act by that time, our ability to find out who the terrorists are talking to, what they are saying, and what they are planning will be compromised.

So dire was the threat that Bush said that he was prepared to delay his scheduled trip to Africa.

Reid responded today by letter, saying that the fault for letting the Protect America Act lapse lay with Bush and the Republicans, and that he regretted Bush's "reckless attempt to manufacture a crisis." The full letter is below.

And so it goes.

February 14, 2008

President George W. Bush
The White House
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:

I regret your reckless attempt to manufacture a crisis over the reauthorization of foreign surveillance laws. Instead of needlessly frightening the country, you should work with Congress in a calm, constructive way to provide our intelligence professionals with all needed tools while respecting the privacy of law-abiding Americans.

Both the House and the Senate have passed bills to reauthorize and improve the Protect America Act. Democrats stand ready to negotiate with Republicans to resolve the differences between the House and Senate bills. That is how the legislative process works. Your unrealistic demand that the House simply acquiesce in the Senate version is preventing that negotiation from moving forward.

Our bicameral system of government was designed to ensure broad bipartisan consensus for important laws. A FISA bill negotiated between the House and the Senate would have firmer support in Congress and among the American people, which would serve the intelligence community's interest in creating stronger legal certainty for surveillance activities.

That negotiation should take place immediately. In the meantime, we should extend the current Protect America Act. Earlier this week you threatened to veto an extension, and at your behest Senate Republicans have blocked such a bill. Yesterday every House Republican voted against an extension.

Your opposition to an extension is inexplicable. Just last week, Director of National Intelligence McConnell and Attorney General Mukasey wrote to Congress that "it is critical that the authorities contained in the Protect America Act not be allowed to expire." Similarly, House Minority Leader Boehner has said "allowing the Protect America Act to expire would undermine our national security and endanger American lives, and that is unacceptable." And you yourself said at the White House today: "There is really no excuse for letting this critical legislation expire." I agree.

Nonetheless, you have chosen to let the Protect America Act expire. You bear responsibility for any intelligence collection gap that may result.

Fortunately, your decision to allow the Protect America Act to expire does not, in reality, threaten the safety of Americans. As you are well aware, existing surveillance orders under that law remain in effect for an additional year, and the 1978 FISA law itself remains available for new surveillance orders. Your suggestion that the law's expiration would prevent intelligence agents from listening to the conversations of terrorists is utterly false.

In sum, there is no crisis that should lead you to cancel your trip to Africa. But whether or not you cancel your trip, Democrats stand ready to negotiate a final bill, and we remain willing to extend existing law for as short a time or as long a time as is needed to complete work on such a bill.

Sincerely,

Harry Reid


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mth44sc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dear Harry
I regret your assistance in helping him to do so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is that you, Harry Reid?
Why'd you let the Immunity pass the Senate, then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You ask a good question tekisui...
Why do you think so? Was it a political maneuver? Was it something that was agreed to by Pelosi and Reid? Since laws have to be agreed to by both Houses of Congress, why bog it down in the Senate when the House can bog it down? After all, there is less possible political damage to be done in the House than in the Senate. This is politics. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I think you got it.
The Dems have the votes to make things happen in the House, and don't face filibuster-obstruction. Just walk outs.:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. well hell...that's telling him Harry....
when do you suppose the chimp will get back to you on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. This letter has been made public so it isn't just "telling him" as you suggest but
It is telling America that the Leader of the US Senate is saying the President is LYING to America. He is flat out calling the President a LIAR in no uncertain terms. That is the purpose of such letters, otherwise it would just hit the old circular filing cabinet and no one would know anything about it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Isn't it great that the Majority Leader has to give civics lessons to the idiot-in-chief?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why
Why would bush care if it expired now, he has never cared what the laws said before this ,why would he start now, bush, the senate and the house don't care one iota bout this country or the people in it. They care only for their little boys ego games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The irony is that he was going to veto it earlier. Why indeed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. manufacturing a crisis is a Bush trademark...and it has worked well for him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. Gee, ya think? He's pretty good at it to. That's how we got to Iraq. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The House Dems called the Silver Spoon Sociopath on his
bluff & they won, for a change. Busholini, the Fascist, still has delusions of Grandeur.

Immunity for the ATT&T & Verizon are more about protecting Busholini & his Fascist Regime than
the Telecoms. Civil action against them would lead right to Illegalities by the Busholini Regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC