Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Attempt to shoot down spy satellite to cost up to $60 million

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:48 PM
Original message
Attempt to shoot down spy satellite to cost up to $60 million
Source: CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The attempt by the U.S. Navy to use an anti-missile missile to shoot down a potentially hazardous satellite will cost between $40 million and $60 million, Pentagon officials told CNN on Friday.

A missile is launched from the Navy guided missile cruiser USS Shiloh during a 2006 test.

The missile alone costs almost $10 million, Lt. Gen. Carter Ham said at a Pentagon briefing. He declined to give an overall cost estimate.

"I think we're working with all the parties to how much did it cost to modify the missiles, the fire control, that kind of business," he said.

Pentagon officials argue the effort is worth the expense because of the slim -- but real -- chance that the satellite's unused fuel, 1,000 pounds of toxic hydrazine, could land in a populated area.

Because the super-secret spy satellite malfunctioned immediately after launch in December 2006, its fuel tank is full, and it would probably survive re-entry and disperse harmful, even potentially deadly fumes over an area the size of two football fields.

The missile will carry no warhead; the objective is to break the satellite apart through the force of impact alone, defense officials said. Learn more about the mission »

One Pentagon official -- who spoke on condition of anonymity because the planning for the operation remains classified -- told CNN that since early January, a Navy team, including 200 industry experts and scientists, has been working furiously to modify its sea-based Aegis missile defense system so it can shoot down a satellite in low orbit.

Among the challenges is modifying sensors designed to detect the heat from an incoming warhead so they can spot the much-cooler satellite, which has no heat source and is warmed only by the sun's rays.

In addition, the official says, a floating X-band radar has to be modified to track the satellite's trajectory, and the "fire-control" systems on the Navy ships also needed modification.

No attempt will be made to shoot down the satellite until after the U.S. space shuttle lands next Wednesday.

"The window will open when the shuttle is on the ground," Ham said.

Pentagon officials say three missiles have been modified for the mission, so in theory, the Navy may get three shots at the satellite, although only one at a time.

"They want the period of a day or two to assess the effect of the first missile ... to probably get an orbit or two, to get an understanding of what effect the first intercept had on the satellite before launching another interceptor," Ham said.

more at link: http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/02/15/spy.satellite/?iref=mpstoryview
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is an underestimate, no doubt. Dubya's Star Wars demos were $100 million each.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. OK, so if they're breaking it into pieces...
why is that any better for the fuel? Will it ignite on re-entry or something? I'm a member of a space enthusiast board, I'm going to check the poop on this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It seems they're worried about it creating a debris cloud...
some of it may not re-enter and could cause more space junk I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. what happens if they miss?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Then comes the surcharge
for follow-op. Another 40M or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. No problem! The secondary target is Iran!
Win-win! :)

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Chump change for the chimp
They wast that much money before breakfast everyday

Does anyone know how the size of this thing compares to Skylab?
When it came into the atmosphere, it burned up without any problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. What the hell is 60 million when your billions in debt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Of course. 60 million - one million to shoot it down and 59 million
to pay Blackwater, friends, pay off Al Queda look-alikes, acting lessons, lawyers for friends. But none for the damage done to the earth or earth people or the atmosphere for the destruction caused by the chemical that might descend or might float?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Could this all be Kabuki to impress the Chinese...
...suppose there was a self-destruct charge on board....point a missile as close as you can and when the missile is in near proximity, press the switch and BINGO......The Chinese see just what we want them to see-a clean ASAT kill and a cloud of debris."Gee, we were REAL worried when we lost control but thankfully we can kill any satellite we need to now.....simple sleight of hand??? Maybe we even powered the bird down just for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ever feel like there is more to the story?
Like why wouldn't they hit it with a missile with a warhead on it? Maybe there is a nuclear warhead in the spy satellite they wouldn't want to ignite? Is this why they want the shuttle on the ground first in case the impact ignites it anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. They have not sucked the people dry yet.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why not just take Cheney up and tell him a friend's on board?
:shrug: Hell, Dumbya could pilot. :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC