Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who Feels We Should Start a Civil Suit AGainst Bush and Cheney

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:00 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who Feels We Should Start a Civil Suit AGainst Bush and Cheney
for damages against our country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe John Edwards...
will take the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I Could See More Than Just John Edwards Taking the Case (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dumbass poll. Don't sue them yet REWARD them? How asinine.
How about "Don't sue them because it will blowback on the Democratic nominee come November?" Hmmmmm?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What the FUCK are you suggesting? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Your Concern Has Been Noted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. see post #21
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. Gee, you could have just cut and pasted that short sentence, instead of sending me off to find it.
I almost didn't bother, but then, I figured, what the hell.

But you're wrong.

Servicemembers can't sue the government, and family members haven't had much luck either. That's not an "endorsement" mind you--so please don't shoot the messenger--but it is FACT.

See the FERES DOCTRINE for background--if you're inclined.

http://supreme.justia.com/us/340/135/case.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. it will blowback on the Democratic nominee come November?
That statement could use a bit of fleshing out.

How would it do that? Unless it were H or O actually filing suit I can't see how it would be anything but a win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The minute you put a politician on the ropes, his minions start to gather.
The more you pile on, the greater the sympathy for the politician.

This isn't rocket science.

Check Clinton's popularity levels during the impeachment imbroglio. He was never more beloved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. I dont think you can make that hold in all cases
Certainly there was no groundswell of sympathy for Nixon, and he played for it.

In KC in the forties, no groundswell for Boss Tom Pendergast, and he actually improved the economy through
his fraudulent elections.

One man's rocket science is another man's SWAG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. You can in most, though.
Nixon was seen as "tragic" and his banishment was "punishment enough." Later, he actually managed to mitigate his reputation slightly, and was consulted on matters of foreign policy.

Bush could pull off the same trick without much trouble at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've been saying that for years. Make sure to have stress as
part of the suit too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. I would have thought the campaign against Bill Clinton would have answered this clearly.
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 01:19 PM by Tesha
A proper opposition campaign against Bush/Cheney would have
tied their asses up in civil courts years ago.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Uhuh.... lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think they may be immune to suits.....
Maybe someone steeped in federal law would know, but I think we would need to have a 'criminal' wrongdoing found first. Then they may be open to a civil suit. That's why Bushco and some of our 'loyal' Dem senators are trying to give the Telco companies immunity. Otherwise they will be found 'criminally negligent', and then are open to suits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. If There is a "Will" There will be a Way
All it takes in a massive movement for one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. The Republicans tore away some of this protection during the Clinton years.
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 01:21 PM by Tesha
I always figured it would come back to haunt them, and given
Bush's record of blatant criminality and bad dealing, it
should have except for the fact that our pantywaist op-
position won't actually do any opposing.

Tesha


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. In general, elected, and many appointed, officials are...
immune to ordinary civil suits concerning decisions they made as a part of their duties.

Lawyers who have actually been involved in this sort of thing will have much more to say about it, but you just don't go and sue the President because he sucks rocks.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Who is "we" and just what legal basis is there for...
civil suits?

As much as I loathe them, there seems to be little we can do without becoming them, and rather than search the bottoms of garbage cans for ways to punish them, I'd rather work on cleaning up the mess.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. You Can Clean Up "Their" Mess Just SO Someone Else Repeats the Same
no thanks.. not interested
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Well then, have fun finding some way...
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 01:38 PM by TreasonousBastard
to punish the malefactors and make sure nobody does it again.

When you find it, let us know. We'll be working on something hopefully a bit more productive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. We are Gonna Be Cleaning Up the Mess Anyways. We Always Do....
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 01:39 PM by fascisthunter
What you suggest as a productive solution is already gonna happen....:shrug:


very strange
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Ahh, "the high road". Yeah. that's been a real success so far. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Not the "high road." The realistic one avoiding masturbatory...
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 01:40 PM by TreasonousBastard
fantasies about punishment and revenge.

And the "low road" hasn't exactly been a great siucces, has it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Why So Nasty When Someone Suggests We Try to Hold Bushco Accountable?
You as well as MADem seem real pissed at the suggestion....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Because peple have been talking this way for seven years...
and nothing's been done. And nothing will ever be done at the rate it's going.

Few things would make me happier than to see that whole crew frogmarched off to some dungeon, but so far it's all been talk. Just talk.

If someone could actually come up with a realistic scheme to ream their sorry asses it would be nice, but so far it looks like they'll get away with it.

So, get used to it-- they got away with fucking the country over. Now we get to put it back together. Life sometimes really sucks.

Or, find something that sticks to them.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Go Ahead... nobody stopping you. Why Try to Stop Everyone Else?
That's what you're arguing for... to deter people from trying. Your point doesn't make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. Presidents are immune from civil suits from their actions in office.
Supreme Court ruled in 1982 in Nixon v. Fitzgerald that Presidents are absolutely immune from civil damages for his official acts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. not if their actions were Illegal at the time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Sorry you are wrong
But have fun in court if that is your belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. every injured vet, every Iraqi and American widow should sue criminal negligent homicide
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. I have wondered about that
for a very long time. A class action suit against *Dumbass et al filed by WE, THE PEOPLE. I think Jerry Spence would be a terrific man to try, and win, the case! Or, maybe Mr. Fitzgerald?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
33. Sue Them Then IMPRISON Them
Sue Bush and Cheney for everything they have and for everything they will EVER have.

Then indict and convict them.

Then throw them into jail.

A cell in Guantanamo would be quite suitable for both of them.

And let their guards be some of the people that have been waterboarded at Guantanamo!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
36. I think you may have mistakenly typed "suit" instead of "war".
But maybe not.
:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC