Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

JFK murder transcript most likely fake--Guardian Unlimited, UK

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Demagitator Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 02:46 PM
Original message
JFK murder transcript most likely fake--Guardian Unlimited, UK


The transcript of a conversation between Ruby and Oswald, less than two months before the assassination of President John F Kennedy, would be one of the most sensational revelations about an event that has fuelled conspiracy theories for more than 40 years.

But there is one problem with the document unearthed in a safe on the 12th floor of the Dallas courthouse: it is almost certainly a fake.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/feb/18/usa2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. The questions being: why made? why not used? why preserved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demagitator Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Good questions
I personally think it is a fake, but I wonder what the rules are -- to have personal paperwork in a public safe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gary Mack said it's a fake.
Director of the "Sixth Floor" museum in the Texas School Book Depository, a place with no pro-conspiracy books on its shelves, Gary Mack is no John Newman or Peter Dale Scott.

http://www.namebase.org/sources/XM.html

http://www.history-matters.com/pds/DP3_Overview.htm

They know their stuff about Oswald and Ruby and all the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not doubting him.
My interest is why it was made, who made it, why it wasn't used, and why it was preserved.

Being fake doesn't mean the item is without interest of its own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Please do. The guy's been quoted around the world: ''Likely fake.''
I don't know if it's fake or what, my Friend. And, like you, I want to know.

I do know Gary Mack only paints things as "Oswald did it." That attitude, I don't like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerLaw2010 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Discussing a shooting on a parade route that did not exist six months prior = fake.
This is what we call an anachronism.

There was a conspiracy theory centered around a woman claiming that Oswald promised to meet her in a hotel in Cancun after the assassination. Problem: Cancun was an empty sand bar in 1963.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. But who prepared the fake?
What did they plan to do with it? Who overruled it? And who decided not to light a match to it?

People think "fake" means the story's over. To me, that's just the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerLaw2010 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. That reads like bad noir. Really bad, as in send back for rewrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC