Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My letter on the right to privacy- first draft

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 03:37 PM
Original message
My letter on the right to privacy- first draft
Being pro-life and pro Roe Vs Wade is not as odd as it seems. In these times of our paranoid government spying on us, the right to privacy is even more important. Years ago a "pro life" congressman admitted that the affirmation of a right to privacy was at the core of his opposition to Roe Vs Wade. Protecting the unborn was just a means to an end.

Why would our lawmakers be against Americans having a right to privacy? Remember, every Supreme court nominee of Reagan, Bush I and Bush II said there is no right to privacy in the Constitution. Sure it isn't explicit, but it is implied in the 3rd which protects your possessions against housing soldiers on your property, unreasonable searches are forbidden by the 4th. The 5th protects against self incrimination. The 9th says there are rights that go beyond what is spelled out in the Bill of Rights. Most of all, the 1st guarantees our right to believe what we want. Maybe they are like Justice Scalia in thinking we have no rights that are not explicitly spelled out in the Bill of Rights.

So yes, stand up for the unborn, but don't give the authoritarians a tool to erode our right to be left alone. Our right to "Life, Liberty, and pursuit of Happiness" is important. Don't discard our liberty to protect life, because our rights should not end when we draw that first breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good start
say more about how protecting the unborn has been used as a means to an end. Make it personal--should the government be allowed to look at medical records, for example?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I wanted to, but there's a 250 word limit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Well, you did a good job for 250 words n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Is that my daily affirmation? Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. we have no rights that are not explicitly spelled out in the Bill of Rights.
You may want to point out the fallacy of that argument since many believe that the Constitution and the BoR "grants" or "guarantees" rights. It does not.

Rights are something you have simply by virtue of being a living human being. Some of them are so important that the Founders thought it necessary to specifically prohibit the government from taking them away. Privacy should be one of those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drmeow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Excellent point
it is even made in the Declaration of Independence: "... they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good point. My goal is to undermine the politicians that are pushing a
pro life agenda. I want to show that protecting the sanctity of life is not their first priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Exactly
what I think the Constitution is, by framing it that way there should be NO question about a right to privacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thank you. Now the task of working with my "in house editor."
My wife is a writer, so it going to be tough to stand up to her red pen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC