Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Hampshire Rep To Initiate Impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:00 AM
Original message
New Hampshire Rep To Initiate Impeachment
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 12:02 AM by Hissyspit
http://www.mass-impeach.org/2008/02/17/new-hampshire-rep-to-initiate-impeachment

VIDEO HERE: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=385&topic_id=95063&mesg_id=95063

New Hampshire Rep to Initiate Impeachment
February 7, 2008

Feb. 19, 2008 Concord, NH State Rep. Betty Hall, will be holding a hearing for New Hampshire State H.Res.24 to Impeach Bush and Cheney. The Resolution, since it is a STATE resolution, if passed (which it has a good chance of passing) will set in motion Jefferson’s Rules, obligating Congress to act. State Rep. Betty Hall, a 14-term 86 year old state representative, has introduced the resolution.

The hearing will begin Tuesday, February 19, 2008 at 1:00pm at the Legislative Office Building, Rooms 305-307, in Concord, NH.

—————————————–
Speech to the NH House on Impeachment resolution by Representative Hall addressing the impeachment of George W. Bush and Richard Cheney.

Why now? Why NOW? That’s the question I have been asked constantly since I made the request for late introduction of a Resolution to Petition the U.S. House of Representatives to Commence Impeachment Procedures. I based this request to our Rules Committee on House Rules which specifically provide for late introduction after the deadline if approved by the House Rules Committee or a 2/3 vote of the House. The Rules Committee in its wisdom voted (and I understand their reasoning) not to allow the introduction and I am before you today asking this House in its wisdom to allow the introduction of this resolution. The resolution I will propose if this motion passes has been drafted by me and is based on the resolution introduced by Representative Perry at the Democratic State Convention in June of 2006. It passed overwhelmingly even though the Resolutions Committee of the Convention in their wisdom did NOT recommend it.

Impeachment Resolutions have been introduced in this House before. I was a member of this House when President Nixon was facing the impeachment and Franklin mayor and House colleague, Eugene Danielle introduced an impeachment resolution. It was one of the first to be introduced in the country and Danielle gave an impassioned speech. I wish I was the orator he was.

I have talked with at least three members of this House today who were members then and they remember that speech. It was a very rousing speech and at the end of the speech we had a standing vote. Some remember 11 courageous people stood up and voted for the resolution. I was very moved but I failed to stand up. At least one member today who was a member then stood up. I have always been ashamed that I did not stand. I believe we HAVE TO STAND UP FOR WHAT IS RIGHT, NOT WHAT IS WINNABLE. This is why I believe so strongly NOW is the time to stand up. At least ten other legislatures are reportedly considering the urgency of acting now. I believe there is a compelling need to start the ball rolling NOW. Waiting for the regular process which has been urged by many I respect will put the schedule behind by six months. The people are angry—they want action now. They are angry with Congress as well. The polls affirm this conclusion. They are angry because we are not moving fast enough to stop the Iraq war. Because the war puts our finest young soldiers in harms way, many of our grassroots people have concluded that Congress and the Military, and our Chief Executives have failed in all the arenas listed in the Resolution to Petition Congress. They are afraid that our Chief Executives are still leading us down the path of shock and awe, lies, and deadly assault. Our wonderful troops are being unfairly strained already. How can we sustain a broadening of the conflict to another country? Iran is an absolutely pressing concern, today, tomorrow, the next day. Can we really afford the same mistakes in Iran?

Everything I understand by reading the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution sets forth principles by which we the people must act when a situation develops such as we face at this momentous moment. We have a failure of leadership. I mean ALL leadership. Both parties and the three branches of government bear responsibility. Each citizen bears the responsibility also. If citizens fail to act we are just as doomed as the Germans were when Hitler was allowed to come to power. They let it happen. I know because I was there.

When all else fails, the Constitution provides for impeachment and removal from office. Republicans thought that point of failure happened and impeached President Clinton, and my party thought that happened and both parties forced the resignation of President Nixon when it become obvious he would be impeached. Frankly, I would prefer resignations rather than impeachments as a result of this resolution. No one wants to go through the gut wrenching of impeachment and trial. I want new leadership immediately. Resignations would be the fastest and best. Nobody thought Nixon would resign, but he did.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. My money's on 5.
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 12:33 AM by jazzjunkysue
It will get 5 votes for cloture in the congress and die. The senate won't even hear about it.

They can't take down the joker and two-face without taking themselves out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'll take your money
The senate doesn't vote on impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They ratify it, and you know what I mean. Does everything on here have to come with a 12 page
disclaimer?

Would that make this forum more fun to read?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Could Force A Vote: Up Or Down On Torture/War Crimes
No more heads in the sand -- comforting themselves with lame rationalizations.

Even more than a few GOPers may be hard-pressed to defend the criminal regime -- for the historical record, for their personal legacies, to their families/descendants.

This could easily upset the apple cart of willful ignorance.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It will get even less attention in the congress than this post did.
It's a non-starter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. But that was said about the Kucinich articles.
And that now sits before the Judiciary Committee. With support growing.

Having to literally put the atrocities in one's own name can have some surprising effects.

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. KnR for Betty Hall's efforts! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC