Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gitmo Trials Rigged From The Start For Political Reasons (The Nation)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:47 AM
Original message
Gitmo Trials Rigged From The Start For Political Reasons (The Nation)
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 09:50 AM by kpete
.....justice is meant to serve the party."

February 20, 2008
Gitmo Trials Rigged
Ross Tuttle

...........

As the murky, quasi-legal staging of the Bush Administration's military commissions unfolds, a key official has told The Nation that the trials are rigged from the start. According to Col. Morris Davis, former chief prosecutor for Guantánamo's military commissions, the process has been manipulated by Administration appointees in an attempt to foreclose the possibility of acquittal.

...........................

Then, in an interview with The Nation in February after the six Guantánamo detainees were charged, Davis offered the most damning evidence of the military commissions' bias--a revelation that speaks to fundamental flaws in the Bush Administration's conduct of statecraft: its contempt for the rule of law and its pursuit of political objectives above all else.

When asked if he thought the men at Guantánamo could receive a fair trial, Davis provided the following account of an August 2005 meeting he had with Pentagon general counsel William Haynes--the man who now oversees the tribunal process for the Defense Department. "(Haynes) said these trials will be the Nuremberg of our time," recalled Davis, referring to the Nazi tribunals in 1945, considered the model of procedural rights in the prosecution of war crimes. In response, Davis said he noted that at Nuremberg there had been some acquittals, something that had lent great credibility to the proceedings.

"I said to him that if we come up short and there are some acquittals in our cases, it will at least validate the process," Davis continued. "At which point, (Haynes's) eyes got wide and he said, 'Wait a minute, we can't have acquittals. If we've been holding these guys for so long, how can we explain letting them get off? We can't have acquittals, we've got to have convictions.'"

.........................

more at:
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080303/tuttle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. we caint have a lynch mob and then let somebody go just cuz theys innercent
That's like a girl flirting with a girl fur a whole date then not pulling the trigger on his derringer.

How's a republican supposed to git some release if he don't see a colored fella swinging at the end of a rope?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. But of course.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kangaroo courts are reminiscent of Stalin.
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 10:08 AM by Jim__
How far we've come under junior!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. We've got to have convictions
That says it all, doesn't it.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. News that all of us should be discussing while the punditry looks at meaningless poll numbers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Everything connected with the Bush Administration if rigged.
Why bother to even make any further specific allegations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. Padilla Redux. Mukasey was involved in admitting evidence obtained by TORTURE!
way back when.

So, don't look to DoJ for Justice now! The AG may be involved in the war crimes already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. He sure did.
Mukasey isn't just protecting Bush/Cheney... but his own rulings as a judge. (and what it says about him)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Very important: They are saying the 9/11 conspirators' trial will be rigged nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yes they were ...and the MCA of 2006 didn't change that at all
They are still bullshit "courts"

(not that I ever kidded myself about the MCA 2006)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. I posted this earlier and it received no attention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC