Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Timing and Sourcing Suggest the GOP, Not Dems, Behind McCain "Smear Campaign"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:58 AM
Original message
Timing and Sourcing Suggest the GOP, Not Dems, Behind McCain "Smear Campaign"
Timing and Sourcing Suggest the GOP, Not Dems, Behind McCain "Smear Campaign"

Posted by Jon Ponder, Pensito Review at 6:42 AM on February 21, 2008.

The fact that Romney’s mitts could have been all over this might also explain McCain’s palpable antipathy toward him.


The McCain campaign has had two months to prepare for the New York Times story about his cozy relationship eight years ago with a young blond woman who happened to be a lobbyist.

The campaign's rapid response team had a news release out last night that twice used the phrase "smear campaign" to describe the Times story:

"It is a shame that The New York Times has lowered its standards to engage in a hit-and-run smear campaign. John McCain has a 24-year record of serving our country with honor and integrity. He has never violated the public trust, never done favors for special interests or lobbyists, and he will not allow a smear campaign to distract from the issues at stake in this election.

"Americans are sick and tired of this kind of gutter politics, and there is nothing in this story to suggest that John McCain has ever violated the principles that have guided his career."


They have had this response in the can for two months, so it bears some scrutiny. The word "smear" is predictable but to use it twice in conjunction with "campaign" is interesting.

One news story is hardly a "campaign." It is obvious from even a casual reading of the Times article that the story has been lawyered to near death. But is there more? The McCain team's use of the word "campaign" suggests there could be.

It is equally likely that "campaign" is a bit of transference -- that McCain and his operatives know the source of the story was a rival campaign.

more...

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/77434/#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wouldn't be suprised if Mittens was behind this n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not surprising at all.
Edited on Thu Feb-21-08 10:10 AM by BrklynLiberal
Didn't Rove once bug his candidate's office just to be able to claim it was the opponent who did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ha, Mitt's endorsement was probably a way of saying "Noooo! Not meeeeeee!" AND, on edit
Edited on Thu Feb-21-08 10:03 AM by MADem
this is the funniest fucking photoshop I have seen in awhile...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. That is fucking hilarious..
you ought to post this in a separate thread. Lots of people are going to want that in their sig lines..:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. The timing of it KILLED Mitt Romney, when he could have won in NH--
so I doubt Romney had anything to do with the story, even if he knew about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. It is definitely from the wrongwing of the aisle. Drudge leaked a bit of this in December. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. I would say this an intra-Party squabble...
But why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. True conservatives loathe McCain. Could be a motive? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. McCain royally pissed off K Street..
especially the republican wing. It's blow-back time. The timing is very odd though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. I was thinking the same thing sis
we all know a RW talking point is to rail against "the liberal media" and the NY Times in particular, but this one smacks of a RW smear job-NOT from the left wing Times. Who is alleging these charges? Ex-McCain people who were fired last summer, and we all know the right wing of the GOP are none too happy that John McCain is going to be forced down their throats this November-they all wanted Rudy and when it looked like he wasn't gonna make it, Romney. Now the thing I'VE been thinking about since last night is how The Straight Talk Express is saying this is what's wrong with politics today and all but will this stop them from employing these very same tactics against the democratic nominee-yea I don't either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. re: "smear campaign"- veerrry interesting... Bennett was on TV this morning,
doing some lawyering. As you say, we could ask if there could be more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. Those were my thoughts as well..
the timing would be very odd for it to be coming from a Democratic source. This is fratricide all the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. What's KKKarl Rove doing nowadays?
Just askin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. What was he doing back then? Another 2000 dirty trick? Backfiring after 8 years?
There are still people who won't vote for John because he won't support his black love child. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. If they spent two months on that, they need to hire new consultants.
Because that "ain't gonna get er done."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. It makes sense from Romney's point o view only if the story was supposed to run in December
Maybe the Times got cold feet and decided it needed further vetting, hence the delay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC