But ACTUALLY, I think Ella is one of the NYT SOURCES...."she" is all over the web...she likes YOUTUBE, it seems
Here (unrelated to the story, making a benign comment about an ELO video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uE6RqGgmPZAand here, two weeks ago:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkcVXIhssCIEllaLohan (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam 0 Reply McCain loves Democrats - loves to be their stooge. He fights with Republicans - loves to antagonize them. He should run with Hillary on a fusion ticket, and leave the GOP once and for all...
She dropped the "Ask John McCain" remark here, too:
http://www.budads.net/video/EgbQviUqndgAnd, she's even been spamming McCain's ads up on YOUTUBE...only they take them down as soon as they see them. THese were up, and then, poof, they disappeared:
YouTube - Health Care AlertEllaLohan (20 hours ago) Show Hide Marked as spam. -3 Good comment Poor comment. Reply. Ask John McCain about his lobbyist "friend" Vicki Iseman. ...
youtobe.51ksp.com/watch?v=1OryNOITzHE - 110k - Cached - Similar pages
YouTube - Web Ad: Character in SpadesEllaLohan (7 hours ago) Show Hide Marked as spam. -1 Good comment Poor comment. Reply. John McCain plus lobbyist Vicki Iseman equals trouble for Republicans ...
2luo.com/watch?v=TuN57wD-EkM&feature=related - 125k - Cached - Similar pages
I think it might be a former McCainiac who drank the KoolAid and worked for Romney this time around--that's my sense. And Romney probably endorsed McCain to throw the suspicion off of him in case this whole thing went badly. I'm not the only one who feels that way, either:
First, the source of the Times article can only be detected by parsing, but it is clear that the details could have only come from -- and been confirmed by -- operatives in McCain's 2000 campaign, all of whom, let's assume, were Republicans. As to motive, how about sour grapes from a 2000 staffer who was not asked to work on the 2008 campaign? Or perhaps one of the 2000 operatives was an extreme-right Dittohead mole, who was working on a rival GOP campaign when the story was originally set to run in December.
Second, the timing: Whoever leaked the story to the Times appears to have synched it to the campaign schedule so that, with fact-checking and the other vetting, the story would be ready to go around December 20 -- immediately before public attention turned away from the campaigns and onto the holidays -- and two weeks before the Iowa caucuses on Feb. 3.
In late December, the Democratic campaigns were focused on each other, and weren't expending much, if any, energy on their Republican rivals. At that point, it was far from clear that McCain would become the frontrunner.
The source of the story was most likely one of McCain's rivals. Judging by their actions, almost all of them could be eliminated except for Mitt Romney, who, as has been noted here and elsewhere, made a big show of "suspending," not ending his campaign. (Campaigns are often technically "suspended" when they close in order to keep payroll and accounting functions open but the difference here is how Romney stressed the word "suspended" in his concession.)
The fact that Romney's mitts could have been all over this might also explain McCain's antipathy toward him, which was so palpable that even pundits and newsreaders -- all of whom have known about this story since before Christmas -- even mentioned it on air.
The Huckabee campaign has known about the story, too, which explains Huckabee's insistence on staying in, despite the dead-certain odds he'll never get the delegates to beat McCain at the convention. Huckabee has said he's sticking around in case McCain has a "macaca moment."
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/77434/#more