Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bushco Claims Telcos Are REFUSING To Cooperate With His Lawbreaking

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:42 AM
Original message
Bushco Claims Telcos Are REFUSING To Cooperate With His Lawbreaking
Now, the Bush admin is claiming the telcos are refusing to cooperate


Two top Bush administration officials said Friday that some telecommunications companies are resisting wiretapping orders for terrorists because a surveillance law expired nearly a week ago.

National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell and Attorney General Michael Mukasey made the assertion in a letter to Congress, the latest salvo in a rhetorical war between the White House and Capitol Hill over the law's expiration and the refusal of House Democrats to adopt a Senate-passed bill in its place.

................

They said some private companies have delayed or refused compliance with requests to initiate wiretaps against people covered by orders issued under the expired law. They said most companies are cooperating, but some have suggested they will stop if "the uncertainty persists."

Senior administration officials refused Friday to specify which companies, or how many, were not cooperating. They said the companies believe the law's expiration means no changes can be made in existing orders, which can last for as long as a year. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8V004601&show_article=1

..................

so, we've got to go to those telecoms and tell them, "look, we know we 'forced' you to break the law, and we know we told you we'd fix everything up for you, but we didn't expect that breaking the law was going to cause so much fuss, so just hang in there and keep on breaking the law, and we'll keep trying to change the law so that you won't have to break it any more, ok...?"

more at:
http://takeitpersonally.blogspot.com/2008/02/now-bush-admin-is-claiming-telcos-are.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. All Bush has to do is hand the Telecoms a Warrant and They will comply immediately
Just like always, but legally this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Bingo! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Pretty simple, isn't it?
The FISA court hands out warrants like candy. Always has.

Now, unless they're afraid that the FISA would DENY the warrant (e.g. ILLEGAL SPYING ON AMERICANS), I don't see a problem here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. The telecoms refusing to wiretap is the best news I've heard in a while.
The dem congress can have an effect if they're willing to make the effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bush is not above the law
No more bugging Dem phone lines W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. But but but.... that lack of standing ruling by SCOTUS says he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. And we still haven't been attacked?
Get on the ball, *.

Stage another one, the country needs to go shopping again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. so they respect law?? how dare them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. "Respect" is not exactly the word I would use. Possibly "Fear" would work better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Something tells me we are about to have another inside terrorist attack!
and the democrats will be artificially blamed. After all its election year...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC