Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry bill extends protection for servicemembers from home foreclosure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:30 AM
Original message
Kerry bill extends protection for servicemembers from home foreclosure

By Mr. KERRY:

S. 2658. A bill to amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to extend from 90 days to one year the period after release of a member from the Armed Forces from active duty during which the member is protected from mortgage foreclosure; to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

Mr. KERRY. Mr. President, in the Congress and in Washington these last years, there has been a tragic disconnect between the words spoken about keeping faith with those who wear the uniform of our country, and the actions actually taken to make those words count.

From the tragic conditions at Walter Reed to the backlog of claims at the Veterans Administration, there has been a long list of problems unaddressed--and of problems that arose because someone, somewhere didn't plan ahead to prevent problems for those who sacrifice for all of us.

Today we know from VA estimates that nearly 200,000 veterans are homeless on any given night and that nearly 400,000 veterans experience homelessness over the course of a year--a national disgrace to consider that in the richest country on the planet perhaps one out of every three homeless men sleeping in a doorway, alley or box once wore the uniform of our country.

We also know from the Bush administration's own U.S. Labor Department, that, for example, in 2006, the unemployment rate for young veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan was 15 percent, more than triple the national average back then. We know that too many unemployed veterans are National Guard or Reserve troops who were called to duty but found when they came home that their old jobs were gone, that they'd lost their place in line in the local economy, or that the small businesses they'd left behind to serve overseas were in dire straits when they came home.

We know these two challenges--the homeless rates for veterans and the unemployment numbers for veterans--demand big solutions, and we are working to provide them.

But we should also know by now that the least we can do is stop these problems from becoming worse. We have seen a wave of foreclosures send a ripple effect across the economy. By late 2007, 2.5 million mortgages were in default--a 40 percent increase from just 2 years earlier. Last month, foreclosures in Massachusetts alone were up 128 percent from the previous January. In fact, in 2007 alone 1.6 million Americans defaulted on their home loans, and as many as 3.5 million more are expected to do the same by mid-2010.

Every U.S. Senator would agree that the thought of our men and women in uniform being thrown out of their homes because of mortgage foreclosures is miles beyond unacceptable. The question is, in the middle of a national housing crisis and a subprime mortgage collapse, what can be done--done at a minimum--to ensure that Washington acts to shield veterans from becoming the faces of the foreclosure crisis, and from making today's Iraq and Afghanistan veterans the faces of tomorrows' homeless and jobless populations.

We know that the soaring and staggering foreclosure statistics are directly affecting Americans from all walks of life, and our military is not exempt from the pain. The least we can do today is make it clear that we will pay some small measure of respect to veterans by helping them avoid foreclosure. They need more time and greater flexibility as they return to civilian life. The Commission on the National Guard and Reserves has urged us to take preventative action. The Commission found that the transition from military to civilian life extends well beyond the current timelines which forces many service members to focus their attention on imminent foreclosure instead of first locating a competitive job or addressing any mental or physical health concerns that they may be facing.

That is why today I am introducing commonsense legislation that would protect servicemembers and veterans involved in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan by securing a longer grace period for payment. My bill would extend the time from 90 days to 1 year the time period that a servicemember is protected from foreclosure. By extending the deadline to 1 year, I hope we can take one small step to prevent future homelessness throughout the veteran's community.

If America's leaders truly support our troops, we owe them more than a polite thank you and best wishes. We owe them action. We cannot tolerate a pattern in Washington that has persisted for too long--provide lip service about supporting the troops but not the lifesaving body armor they need; talk a good game about veterans but cut funding for their healthcare. It is wrong, and it is time for it to end. We should act now to ensure that those saddled with the burden of the mortgage crisis are not those who have carried the greatest responsibility for America overseas in the fight for freedom. I urge my colleagues to support this legislation.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be printed in the RECORD.

There being no objection, the text of the bill was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows:

S. 2658

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE PROTECTION PERIOD FOR SERVICEMEMBERS.

(a) Extension of Protection Period.--Subsection (c) of section 303 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 533(c)) is amended by striking ``90 days'' and inserting ``one year''.

(b) Extension of Stay of Proceedings Period.--Subsection (b) of such section (50 U.S.C. App. 533(b)) is amended by striking ``90 days'' and inserting ``one year''.

(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to individuals performing a period of military service (as that term is defined in section 101(3) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 511(3))) that begins on or after October 7, 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Someone tell me why a store clerk in the same situation DOESN'T deserve the same protection. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. It takes more than a year just to adjust back to society after being in a warzone.
You would think that should be an easy conclusion even to the harshest critics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You don't have to have been in a war zone to be covered by that bill.
Also, while post-war PSTD is a very serious handicap, there are others, "civilian" ones that are just as serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. To a degree - still, why not do WHAT he can with the votes he KNOWS he can get on this?
I can't imagine anyone begrudging this protection.

Or anyone knocking Kerry for drafting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Wrong. I'm begrudging the LACK of similar protection for the OTHER people.
But you knew that already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You do what you can with the votes you KNOW you can get - and there is a separate bill
going through on foreclosures that looks like it will be debated. So...why NOT carry through on this one while the other one gets battled out?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Nothing wrong with pushing it. It's rather a symptom of a wrong hierarchy of values.
Now, what about that "generic" bill you speak of? Do you think it has the same chances of success?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Bet Kay "Speeding Bullet" Hutchinson votes a big NAY on this one
also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unbowed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. There have to be some additional benefits for our military members.
They are required to fight and die when asked to by their country. They do so in order that the rest of us can be clerks.

We need a military. They certainly don't get paid enough for what they do. And their benefits (including education and medical care) have been severely diminished by Republican administrations.

Remember, our military is currently all volunteer. There has been talk of re-instating the draft. Would you want that? I think more clerks would prefer to give our service members a little extra help than be drafted into service themselves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Well said. Thank you.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. He wasnt ordered to
Afghanistan for 15 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why should service members get special consideration? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Maybe he's still trying to prove he "supports the troops."
As an aside, I'll bet those psycho RWers (but I repeat myself) that made a site with the express purpose to watch this one will be jumping around, brandishing this thread and saying we are "anti-military" because we believe servicemember shit smells just as bad as anybody else's.

Yeah, lunatics, I am talking about you. I know you're reading this, one syllable every 2 seconds and vocalizing. See you. Assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Kerry doesn't have to PROVE anything. Idiots who can't read a book or a congressional record
can just steep in their own ignorance while others of us take seriously our duties as informed citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unbowed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Kerry doesn't have to prove he supports the troops. He was the troops.
And besides, the most furious RW assholes are the ones CUTTING the benefits of our troops. To them, troops are just grunts to be used and die and to use when it's "invoke fear" or "invoke patriotism" time (an election).

There are many progressive members of the military. Not all have been brainwashed by Limbaugh radio propaganda. Check out http://www.veteransforcommonsense.org/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. You mean as he has continually since 1970
He visited VA hospitals and advocated on those issue as soon as he returned to the US - before he could speak out on the war. Read the 1971 Senate testimony some time - Kerry was suppose to speak on the winter soldier event - which he crammed into a long paragraph. He then spoke about treating the veterans better, ending the war and changing the underlying foreign policy. Kerry and other people in VVA fought to get Agent Orange identified as harmful and advocated that PTSD be treated. This is something very real to him.

He also was working in the Finance committee with Smith to work on this issue for everyone. There provision was in the Senate plan that was not passed. http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1070479
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Thanks, karynnj.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unbowed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. They do the job that the rest of us don't want to do.
Without some special consideration for our military members who sacrifice so much for us, we might see the draft again. A few considerations for their service is a small price to pay for having a military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. Becha they didn't vote for him n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. It says something that you know that he would work just as hard on this
and other veteran rights and benefits even if he knew that none of them would.

The fact is that Kerry has substantial support from veterans, soldiers and their families. They are a group that definitely leans to the right, but he did better than many Democrats with them. There were many MA Vietnam veterans who went to Iowa to speak to Iowans in his favor.

I know there is a large segment who hate him, but I also was surprised when a Republican WWII veteran told me in early 2004 that he hoped Kerry won the Democratic nomination. He explained that he was not happy with Bush and didn't like most of the other Democratic possibilities - after liking Kerry in the debates, he found the full 1971 testimony and read it. His comment was that he saw where he was coming from, that he was a good man and, as he saw in the primary debates, very smart. He voted for Kerry in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Yeah, I'm waiting for the first Swift-BOT to recant, upon which I will proceed to....
Well, I'm sure I will be looked upon as mean spirited if I complete the thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. This is fantastic...
...news!

When people start questioning a candidate's patriotism...for not wearing a lapel pin, for example :) ...we can point out this as an example of what TRUE patriotism means. It's not wearing a pin, or how you salute the flag...TRUE patriotism is shown by the actions you take to benefit the country...and those that defend it.:patriot:


Thank you, Senator Kerry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Here's MORE recent action from Kerry to protect vets and their families.
With nod to ProSense.

02/15/2008

Kerry Veteran, Reservist Bill Signed Into Law

WASHINGTON – Yesterday, bipartisan legislation authored by Senator John Kerry to aid veteran and reservist entrepreneurs was signed into law. Kerry's bill, cosponsored by Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), will increase loans and business training resources to veterans and help reservists keep their businesses afloat during deployment.

“Massachusetts’ 477,000 veterans, including the more than 28,000 who fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, will now have access to real opportunities to start and grow their businesses,” said Senator Kerry. “Our veterans who put their lives on the line for our national security deserve economic opportunity when they come home, and this bipartisan achievement is one small way we can repay them for their hard work and sacrifice.”

Kerry has been a leader in the Senate working to expand economic opportunities for veterans and reservists and has spearheaded this legislation since last spring to pass it into law. Last year, Kerry held a hearing examining the challenges facing veteran and reservist small business owners. In Massachusetts, there are approximately 28,000 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.

Last Congress, Kerry introduced the Military Family Bill of Rights, a bill that provided comprehensive and direct assistance for military members and their families, including loans, grants and tax credits to help veterans and reservists. Additionally, Kerry led a field hearing in Massachusetts to discuss ways to ease the burden of lengthy deployments on National Guard and Reservists who own or work for small businesses.

Senators Kerry and Snowe introduced the Military Reservist and Veteran Small Business Reauthorization and Opportunity Act (S. 1784) last year. Specifically, the legislation signed by the President will:

* Increase the authorization of appropriations for the Small Business Administration’s Office of Veteran Business Development;
* Create an Interagency Taskforce on Veteran Small Business to focus on increasing veterans’ small business success, procurement and franchising opportunities, and access to capital;
* Make permanent the Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs;
* Allow the SBA Administrator to offer loans up to $50,000 without requiring collateral from a loan applicant;
* Improve the Military Reservist Economic Injury Disaster Loan program by providing a longer application deadline; creating a pre-deployment loan approval process; expanding outreach and technical assistance;
* Require a Government Accountability Office report on the needs of service-disabled veterans and a separate report on how to improve relations between employers and reservist employees;
* Create a loan participation program in which veterans can receive 7(a) loans while paying 50 percent of the fees;
* Require Veteran Business Outreach Centers to increase their participation in the Transition Assistance Program;
* Create a grant program to improve Small Business Development Centers’ outreach to the veteran community; and
* Require the Office of Veterans Business Development to create and disseminate information aimed at informing women veterans about the resources available to them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. Got to love the John Kerry.
::applause::
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC