Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

United Church of Christ being investigated by the IRS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ladym55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:45 PM
Original message
United Church of Christ being investigated by the IRS
I just received an email from the United Church of Christ that they are being investigated by the IRS and the denomination's tax-exempt status is being threatened BECAUSE CHURCH MEMBER BARACK OBAMA SPOKE AT THE DENOMINATION'S 50TH GENERAL SYNOD MEETING.

Now I realize that we are all hot and bothered by the primaries right now, but this ISN'T about Obama. It's about a progressive denomination being intimidated by the federal government.

The Internal Revenue Service has notified the United Church of Christ's national offices in Cleveland, Ohio, that the IRS has opened an investigation into U.S. Sen. Barack Obama's address at the UCC's 2007 General Synod as the church engaging in "political activities."

In the IRS letter dated Feb. 20, the IRS said it was initiating a church tax inquiry "because reasonable belief exists that the United Church of Christ has engaged in political activities that could jeopardize its tax-exempt status."


This is chilling. Today John Haggee endorses McCain, and James Dobson and Pat Robertson regularly insert themselves into the political process with any consequences. HOWEVER, if progressive denomination has a member speak (who is a political candidate), they are in danger of losing tax-exempt status. What about ALL the churches that have hosted Huckabee in his campaign? Are THEY being investigated?

Now the denomination is forced to start a defense fund.

To read more about it, check out this link from the UCC website:
www.ucc.org/news/obama-speech-in-2007-prompts-1.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. ladym55, can you post this in GD/Primaries also? Thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Which churches have hosted Huckabee?
I would be interested in reporting this if you have knowledge of it. He does make his living doing speaking engagements around the planet and has been for a long time but this is the first I have heard of him speaking in an actual church since his presidential bid. Can you list these?

Left of Cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Having someone speak at a synod meeting is *far* different
Than an individual member of the denomination allowing a politician to speak at the pulpit..

Weve seen politicans on both sides speak at churches but not at the national convention for that church..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. A Synod Meeting means nothing to IRS
The poster siinsinuated Huckabee was speaking at churches and this should be investigated. But I need a list.

Left of Cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. It shurly does
An annual national synod meeting is where churches at the national level set policy make theological decisions for the denomination, and set other massive priorities. Having someone running for president here threatens to poison both wells (church and state)...

For years on the left and right politicians have spoken at churches Bill Clinton often spoke at churches

And men of the cloth have been active in politics (Reverend Jessie Jackson, Pat Robertson, ...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Make a list then
of all the church like places where you know for sure that Huckabee has campaigned from the pulpit and not preached so I can turn him in to the organization I belong to. All I need is a list but I also need to know for sure that he was actually campaigning. Videos or links to videos would also be great as that is more proof.

Left of Cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. You did not read my post
Campaigning in a church is one thing (The Democrats and Republicans have been doing it for years)

A national convention of an entire denomination is completely different..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Okay which synod/religious convention
I would still need the name of the synod or was it the Southern Baptist Convention before I could turn him in for campaigning illegally.

Left of cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. The SBC national convention meets in June
By then I suspect Huck will be out by that meeting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladym55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. He is a 20-year member of the church
And he was asked to talk about his faith journey. My concern is that the right crosses the line regularly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Not at national conventions where
Theological lines are drawn, funding and mission lines are drawn, and many other aspects of church practice are set..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Actually, not many aspects of UCC practice are set at Synod.
Synod cannot set policy that is binding on judicatories or local congregations. No covenanted ministry of the UCC can tell another what to do about anything. Synod passes resolutions, but they are not binding on any other body. It's more like a big family reunion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Sorry but youre wrong
"ATLANTA — The United Church of Christ's rule-making body voted overwhelmingly yesterday to endorse same-sex marriage, making it the largest Christian denomination to do so.

The vote is not binding on individual churches, but could cause some congregations to leave the fold.

Roughly 80 percent of the representatives on the church's 884-member General Synod voted to approve the resolution yesterday, a day after a smaller committee recommended it."

When teh Synod meets big decisions about church doctrine are made..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. This is not church doctrine. It was a resolution of GS and nothing else.
Completely NOT binding on local congregations or judicatories. Indeed, your quote says "the vote is not binding on individual churches..." The article is mistaken in referring to GS as "the United Church of Christ's rule-making body". It simply isn't. Only local congregations set rules binding on local congregations.

I teach a UCC polity course. I know whereof I speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. Yes, not a "top-down" church at all
So no church-wide decisions would be taken.

Seems to me RW candidates regularly speak at meetings of RW Christians, and I haven't heard of them being targeted like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. But the Baptists get a free ride? Methodists, too?
In January of this year, both Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton spoke separately to the national gathering of the National Baptist Convention of America. In April 1996, when her husband, Bill Clinton, was seeking re-election, then-First Lady Hillary Clinton, who is United Methodist, spoke before her denomination's quadrennial General Conference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladym55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I don't have specifics on that
I do remember seeing him on one of the news shows in the last few months and it being reported that he was in the pulpit at a Southern Baptist church. I'll do some checking and see what I can find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Don't forget that he is a preacher
He need only report to IRS that his minister status has naught to do with campaigning. Legally, he has done nothing wrong as long as he is preaching from the pulpit and not campaigning.

Left of Cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladym55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Well, it got covered on the news
It was treated as part of Huckabee's campaign. I remember it because what he SAID during his sermon was political and kind of scary to me. Unfortunately, I'm old enough to have a menopausal memory so can't immediately grab the details for you here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Exactly. Thank you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladym55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
36. I've been touring the Huckabee website
I can't find church appearances in the media section. Rats. However, I found a LONG list of various conservative church leaders (including pastors) endorsing Huckabee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. And so it begins....only Republican religous organizations can
participate in the political process and all others are prosecuted.

Sounds like the person at the IRS that made the decision should be investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't forget Jerry Falwell. He was always hangin' around republicker presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. But
did any of them ever speak in his church? And that is the issue with IRS. eeeeeeeeek! Asswell is someone I do not miss!

Left of Cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. pat robertson ran for president for chrissakes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. He can run for president. So could I, if I wanted.
This is a function of a private citizen. But one cannot, in one's role as pastor representing a church, endorse a candidate or party. And churches can never do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. and the investigation into the Southern Baptist Convetion has also been started?
Opps- of course there was never such an investigation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. This is still ongoing I believe n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. I do think it was handled badly. His campaign workers were at GS,
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 10:13 PM by mycritters2
taking donations and volunteer contact info. It was clear that his campaign saw this as a campaign event. That should not have happened. He should've kept them FAR away from the site. The speech itself was pretty apolitical, except for his promising universal healthcare, but the campaign presence is troubling.

Yes, conservatives do similar things. They shouldn't. Neither should we.

I was troubled by it at the time, and I'm troubled now. Especially since local UCC churches have 501c3 status because they're part of the national church, and not as local congregations. If National screwed this up and costs local churches our status, there will be hell to pay. They should've handled this better.

You're also, right, though, that Hagee and Robertson should not be endorsing candidates. Indeed, it's illegal for them to do so. Their churches should come under investigation as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Can't they endorse a candidate
as long as it isn't done from the pulpit? IRS is a bit vague on this part.

Left of Cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. A church or other 501c3 as a corporate body cannot endorse a candidate or party.
This is really clear. The 501c3 corporation can't endorse a candidate or party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. That part is clear b
"The 501c3 corporation can't endorse a candidate or party." But the individual can which is how many of them get around the IRS.

Left of Cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. The individual can't do so in his or her capacity as clergy
or an officer of the corporation. I live in a parsonage and won't even put yard signs in my yard, for fear of violating this rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. I think some of the answers may be in the IRS letter
http://www.ucc.org/news/pdf/lettrirs.pdf


In the last two lines of page 1, and the first 3 paragraphs of page 2 (it's a PDF document so I can't copy and paste) it explains what the issue was. It appears that, essentially, the problems were that Obama was the only one asked to speak at the event (which implies support for him by the synod), and that there were 40 Obama volunteers outside the center promoting his campaign.




Other churches have had clashes with the IRS for issues with candidates. For example, last August Americans United called for a church in CA to be investigated because the pastor, Wiley Drake, had sent out a press release endorsing Mike Huckabee. The IRS later decided to do so. Most recently, Wiley was in the news because he asked his followers to engage in "Imprecatory Prayers" (IOW, he wanted them to pray for the deaths of) against members of Americans United because they'd had the audacity to ask the IRS to investigate him for his illegal activities.

Gotta love those fundies. :sarcasm:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. I think they can easily argue that he was the only candidate invited
because he's the only one who is UCC. But the campaign workers on site are hard to explain away. I do think that crossed a line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. You're right there
Even though the campaign workers were outside the building they were still close enough to leave people with the impression that they were connected with the event. Therefore it was crossing the line. As for Obama being the only one invited, AFAIK he is the only UCC candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #37
46. They were connected with the event.
I don't see how they can argue otherwise.

If my congregation loses its 501c3 over this, I am going to be pissed!

For what that's worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. Gotta' love the First Southern Baptistibans. Not.
Reactionary right back to the stone age. It was interesting to visit one of their church services which consisted mainly of denigrating other churches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Denigrating everybody
I think they hate everyone but themselves. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #39
56. Truth be told, I believe they secretly hate themselves, and don't know why
We cannot change anything unless we first accept it;
condemnation does not liberate, it oppresses. - Carl Jung

Interesting, My childhood reverend,in our humble little UCC church on the west coast, was a student of Carl Jung's work, and consequently, we learned a lot about Jung's philosophy in his weekly sermons. I wonder if First Southern Baptists ever even heard of Jung?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. Probably not
Jung isn't in the Bible. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
44. he's the only one running who's a member of the UCC
and let's not forget he was how many points down in the polls when he spoke?

it's interesting, for lack of a better word, that this is coming out now-a week before the March 2 primaries




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. He spoke in June. Were there polls in June? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #44
53. The time delay isn't surprising
I don't think it has anything to do with the primaries.

The IRS action on the Wiley/Huckabee issue I referenced in my previous post took 6 months from the date of the original action. (Wiley endorsed Huckabee in August, and the IRS action occurred in February of the next year).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
34. That's very frightening. I wonder where things stand with
All Saints in Pasadena, too? They were targeted last year because of a sermon that was anti-war. In church? Anti-war? Can you imagine?

This is one more example of the GOP and Bush administration's absolute willingness to use any means at their disposal to harm the opposition, regardless of its legality. Gov. Siegelman probably has something to say on that count, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
40. the IRS did this to a Pasadena church in 2004 (link inside)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
41. Why should this surprise you? An innocent Governor (dem) from Alabama sits
in the slammer for being a dem! Fight or cough up the taxes or stay home!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
42. I got the same alert.
This is absurd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Wow! There are more UCCs here than I realized!
:hi: Hi, UCC sibling!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. Hola!
I'm not one to make it to Church, but I love the action alerts and the "values" of the UCC. I wish they had a late service near by, I'd likely go more often. ;)

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. Hola!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #43
49. hi
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. Hi! Are you anywhere near San Luis Obispo?
A friend of mine took a call there about a year ago. He spent nine years in Iowa, but was homesick for California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Alameda is up the coast about 3 or 4 hrs
we're by Oakland and across the bay from San Francisco
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. Oh. I don't know California at all.
Only time I was ever there was when Synod was in Oakland. I was a delegate, so no time for sightseeing. I only saw my hotel room, the convention center, and the sidewalk in between. I have no feel for California at all.

My girlfriend did her BA at Berkeley and wants to retire to that area. I want to retire to Iowa. i foresee this being a problem. If the relationship lasts that long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. you can't afford to retire to this area
hateful expensive out here

but you all could settle on some places maybe in the northern part of the state-rural, but still close enough to the SF and Sacramento areas


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
55. Pastor Hagee has "endorsed" Mc Cain. But I don't think the IRS will investigate.
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 12:35 AM by Wizard777
Another politically motivated investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
59. I heard this on NPR last night...
He was invited before he announced his candidacy!

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC